Aim and Scope

The purpose of the journal "MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)" is to discuss the results of scientific research and topical issues in the field of economics, entrepreneurship, theory and practice of management, development of education in the Russian Federation and abroad. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the processes taking place in the Russian economy.

The main task of the journal is to provide an opportunity for scientific and business community to publish results of their research whereby to attract the attention of important areas of economic science.

The mission of the journal is the promotion of results of research and innovative practical achievements in all spheres of Economy in the world.

The journal deals with the problems of socio-economic development of countries and regions, short-, medium- and long-term forecasts of national economy and its sectors, the issues of structural investment, social, financial and foreign policies, economic strategies, the processes of globalization and modernization in the sectors of economy.

Readers of the journal are researchers, analysts, practitioners within the field of Economics, and a wide circle of people interested in the socio-economic issues both in Russia and abroad.

Section Policies

MODERNIZATION -

The section publishes articles on the results of research in the field of promising and relevant areas of modernization in the sectors of the economy. The special attention is paid to the analysis of processes occurring in the Russian economy.

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

INNOVATION -

The section discusses the results of research and innovative practical achievements in all spheres of the domestic and world economy.

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

RESEARCH -

The section deals with the problems of socio-economic development of countries and regions, short-, medium- and long-term forecasts of national economy and its sectors, the issues of structural investment, social, financial and foreign policies, economic strategies.

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

HAVE AN OPINION -

The section presents private opinions of domestic scientists on various socio-economic issues (including scientific discussions, reviews of scientific publications, etc.). The section is formed by special invitations and decisions of Editorial Board.

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

EDITOR-IN-CHIEF'S WORD

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Publication Frequency

4 issues per year 

Open Access Policy

“MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” = “MIR (Modernizatcija. Innovatcii. Razvitie)” is an open access journal. All articles are made freely available to readers immediatly upon publication.

Our open access policy is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) definition - it means that articles have free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself.

For more information please read BOAI statement.

A free reproduction of material of the journal for personal use and a free usage of material of the journal for informational, scientific, educational or cultural purposes are permitted in accordance with Art. 1273–1274 of Ch. 70 of Part IV of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Other variants of usage are only possible after the signing of appropriate agreements with the copyright holders (the management of the journal and the authors of the articles of the journal).

Archiving

• Russian State Library (RSL)
• National Electronic-Information Consortium (NEICON)

Peer-Review

According to the Rules for Authors all the articles, submitted to the Bulletin Editorial Board, should be verified by the institute of reviewing.

The rules of the peer-review

An bilateral anonymous («blind») peer review method is mandatory for processing of all scientific manuscripts submitted to the editorial stuff of «MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)». This implies that neither the reviewer is aware of the authorship of the manuscript, nor the author maintains any contact with the reviewer.

1. Members of the editorial board and leading Russian and international experts in corresponding areas of life sciences, invited as independent readers, perform peer reviews. Editor-in-chief, deputy editor-in-chief or science editor choose readers for peer review. We aim to limit the review process to 2-4 weeks, though in some cases the schedule may be adjusted at the reviewer’s request.

2. Reviewer has an option to abnegate the assessment should any conflict of interests arise that may affect perception or interpretation of the manuscript. Upon the scrutiny, the reviewer is expected to present the editorial board with one of the following recommendations:

• to accept the paper in its present state;

• to invited the author to revise their manuscript to address specific concerns before final decision is reached;

• that final decision be reached following further reviewing by another specialist;

• to reject the manuscript outright.

3. If the reviewer has recommended any refinements, the editorial staff would suggest the author either to implement the corrections, or to dispute them reasonably. Authors are kindly required to limit their revision to 2 months and resubmit the adapted manuscript within this period for final evaluation.

4. We politely request that the editor to be notified verbally or in writing should the author decide to refuse from publishing the manuscript. In case the author fails to do so within 3 months since receiving a copy of the initial review, the editorial board takes the manuscript off the register and notifies the author accordingly.

5. If author and reviewers meet insoluble contradictions regarding revision of the manuscript, the editor-in-chief resolves the conflict by his own authority.

6. The editorial board reaches final decision to reject a manuscript on the hearing according to reviewers’ recommendations, and duly notifies the authors of their decision via e­mail. The board does not accept previously rejected manuscripts for re­evaluation.

7. Upon the decision to accept the manuscript for publishing, the editorial staff notifies the authors of the scheduled date of publication.

8. Kindly note that positive review does not guarantee the acceptance, as final decision in all cases lies with the editorial board. By his authority, editor-in-chief rules final solution of every conflict.

9. Original reviews of submitted manuscripts remain deposited for 5 years.

10. The editorial staff send copies of reviews in the Ministry of Education and Science for admission to the editor of the corresponding request.

Manuscript of a review, if necessary, will be sent to Supreme Attestation Commission of Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.

Indexation

Articles in “MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” = “MIR (Modernizatcija. Innovatcii. Razvitie)” are indexed by several systems:

• Russian Scientific Citation Index (RSCI) – a database, accumulating information on papers by Russian scientists, published in native and foreign titles. The RSCI project is under development since 2005 by “Electronic Scientific Library” foundation (elibrary.ru).
• Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines. The Google Scholar index includes most peer-reviewed online journals of Europe and America's largest scholarly publishers, plus scholarly books and other non-peer reviewed journals.
• Dimensions
• DOAJ
• Cyberleninka
• WorldCat
• Library of Congress
• Base
• VINITI RAS

Journal Authors

The author's audience of the journal includes researchers, analysts and practitioners in the field of economics.

The journal accepts materials from graduate students, applicants, doctoral students, specialists and experts in this field.  Independent articles of students in the journal are not published.

The authors of the journal are people who were identified by the scientific group as the main participants of the presented work and who have agreed to take the responsibility for their work. In addition to the responsibility for his own part of the work, the author should be able to indicate which of his co-authors are responsible for other parts of the work, and should trust the authenticity of the contribution of his co-authors.

The journal “MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” accepts the following criteria for authorship:

• Significant contribution to the concept and design of the research, data collection or analysis and interpretation of data;
• Preparation of the article or its critical revision in terms of significant intellectual content;
• Final approval of the version of the article for publication.

One author may have maximum one article being published in one issue the journal. Members of the editorial board may publish no more than two issues of the journal per year.

The author's team of the article cannot be more than 5 people. After the acceptance of the manuscript by the editors, the composition of the authors of the article may not be changed (increased, reduced)!

The list of authors does not include people who are not the authors of the article. The names of people who are not authors, but have provided other support, indicate in the section "Acknowledgments".

Last updated: 14.10.2022.

Publishing Ethics

The Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement of the journal “MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” are based on the Declaration "Ethical principles of scientific publications" of the Association of Science Editors and Publishers (ASEP). The section are prepared according to the International Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Code of Conduct guidelines and to the materials of the Elsevier publisher (in accordance with international ethical rules of scientific publications).

1. Introduction

1.1. The publication in a peer reviewed learned journal, serves many purposes outside of simple communication. It is a building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. For all these reasons and more it is important to lay down standards of expected ethical behaviour by all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society for society-owned or sponsored journal: “MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” = “MIR (Modernizatcija. Innovatcii. Razvitie)”.

1.2. Publisher has a supporting, investing and nurturing role in the scholarly communication process but is also ultimately responsible for ensuring that best practice is followed in its publications.

1.3. Publisher takes its duties of guardianship over the scholarly record extremely seriously. Our journal programmes record «the minutes of science» and we recognise our responsibilities as the keeper of those «minutes» in all our policies not least the ethical guidelines that we have here adopted.

2. Duties of Editors

2.1. Publication decision – The Editor of a learned “MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” = “MIR (Modernizatcija. Innovatcii. Razvitie)” is solely and independently responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published, often working on conjunction with the relevant society (for society-owned or sponsored journals). The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always underwrite such decisions. The Editor may be guided by the policies of the “MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” = “MIR (Modernizatcija. Innovatcii. Razvitie)” journal’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers (or society officers) in making this decision.

2.2. Fair play – An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

2.3. Confidentiality – The editor and any editorial staff of “MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” = “MIR (Modernizatcija. Innovatcii. Razvitie)” must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

2.4. Disclosure and Conflicts of interest

2.4.1. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

2.4.2. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers.

2.5. Vigilance over published record – An editor presented with convincing evidence that the substance or conclusions of a published paper are erroneous should coordinate with the publisher (and/or society) to promote the prompt publication of a correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other note, as may be relevant.

2.6. Involvement and cooperation in investigations – An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher (or society). Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made, but may also include further communications to the relevant institutions and research bodies.

3.    Duties of Reviewers

3.1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions – Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication, and lies at the heart of the scientific method. Publisher shares the view of many that all scholars who wish to contribute to publications have an obligation to do a fair share of reviewing.

3.2. Promptness – Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor of “MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” = “MIR (Modernizatcija. Innovatcii. Razvitie)” and excuse himself from the review process.

3.3. Confidentiality – Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.

3.4. Standard and objectivity – Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

3.5. Acknowledgement of Sources – Reviewers  should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

3.6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

3.6.1. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

3.6.2. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

4. Duties of Authors

4.1. Reporting standards

4.1.1. Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

4.1.2. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial 'opinion’ works should be clearly identified as such.

4.2. Data Access and Retention – Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

4.3. Originality and Plagiarism

4.3.1. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

4.3.2. Plagiarism takes many forms, from ‘passing off’ another’s paper as the author’s own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another’s paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

4.4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

4.4.1. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal of primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

4.4.2. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.

4.4.3. Publication of some kinds of articles (eg, translations) in more than one journal is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. The authors and editors of the journals concerned must agree to the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. The primary reference must be cited in the secondary publication. 

4.5. Acknowledgement of Sources – Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

4.6. Authorship of the Paper

4.6.1. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

4.6.2. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

4.7. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

4.7.1. If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

4.7.2. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) have approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.

4.8. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

4.8.1. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

4.8.2. Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest possible stage.

4.9. Fundamental errors in published works – When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in a published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the editor of “MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” = “MIR (Modernizatcija. Innovatcii. Razvitie)” journal and cooperate with Publisher to retract or correct the paper, If the editor or the publisher learn from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper.

5. Duties of the Publisher (and if relevant, Society)

5.1. Publisher should adopt policies and procedures that support editors, reviewers and authors of “MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” = “MIR (Modernizatcija. Innovatcii. Razvitie)” in performing their ethical duties under these ethics guidelines. The publisher should ensure that the potential for advertising or reprint revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

5.2. The publisher should support “MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” = “MIR (Modernizatcija. Innovatcii. Razvitie)” journal editors in the review of complaints raised concerning ethical issues and help communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful to editors.

5.3. Publisher should develop codes of practice and inculcate industry standards for best practice on ethical matters, errors and retractions.

5.4. Publisher should provide specialised legal review and counsel if necessary.

The section is prepared according to the materials of the Declaration "Ethical principles of scientific publications" of ASEP, of the International Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and of the Elsevier publisher.

Founder

Lomonosov Moscow State University.

Publisher: School of Public Administration of Lomonosov Moscow State University.

Last updated: 23.04.2025.

Interaction between Journal and Authors

The Editorials maintains correspondence with the responsible (contact) author, but if the team of the authors wishes correspondence may be sent to all authors E-mails.

In the process of interaction with the editors, we kindly ask the authors to:

• always keep the history of correspondence;
• any corrections and changes in the text of the manuscript should be highlighted in color!

1. The process of submitting and reviewing articles

All articles submitted to the journal "MIR (Modernization. Innovations. Development)" go through three stages of editorial review:

Stage 1. Checking for compliance with the requirements of the journal

All articles submitted to the journal "MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)" are preliminary-verified for compliance with formal requirements.

Verification of compliance with the formal requirements of the journal is carried out from 15 days. At this stage, the article may be returned to the author(s) for revision along with a request to eliminate errors or add missing data, and may be rejected due to its non-compliance with objectives of the journal, lack of originality, low scientific value. The Editorial Board reserves the right to reject articles that do not conform to the journal’s publishing rules.

Following the results of preliminary verification the corresponding notification is sent to the author. In case of a positive decision, the author's materials are registered in the journal of the Publisher, with the assigning the manuscript an unique number, which is sent to the author to the specified contact e-mail address. This fact is the conclusion/agreement of the Copyright agreement of the publication of copyright materials within the journal by the Publisher.

Stage 2. Reviewing

The manuscript accepted for consideration is sent for review, in accordance with the provisions of the Rules for conducting review of the journal "MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)". The journal accepts no more than 3 rounds of review. The term of one round of review is 30 days (1 month). In some cases it can be extended.

In Case of a positive conclusion by the reviewers, the article is submitted to the editor to be prepared for publication.

In case of a decision of the required revision of the article, comments of reviewers are sent to the authors. The authors are given 30 days (1 month) to remove comments. If during this period the authors did not notify the Editorials of the planned actions, the article is removed from the publication queue.

In disputable cases, the editor may involve several specialists in the review process, as well as the editor-in-chief. When deciding to refuse publication of an article, the authors are notified of this Editorial decision.

Stage 3. Review by the Editorial Board

The final decision on publication is made by the editorial board. In conflict situations, the decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief.

For the decision concerningthe publication of an article  the criteria is its quality- originality, significance and validity of the results, clarity of text. If the author is a supporter of any socio-political movement or adherent of any religion and this fact is reflected in his / her article it has no effect on the publication or refusal of the article.

Upon the decision to accept the manuscript for publishing, the editorial staff notifies the authors of the scheduled date of publication.

A certificate of acceptance of the article for publication can be issued at the request of the author, only upon the fact of a positive decision of the editorial board on the acceptance of the article for publication!

A final version of the layout of the accepted for publication article is sent to the responsible (contact) author, which he is required to verify. A response from the authors is expected within 2 days. If there is no reaction from the author, the article is considered to be approved.

2. Procedure for reviewing the decisions of editors / reviewers

If the authors do not agree with the conclusion of reviewers and / or editors, or with individual comments, they can challenge the decision. To do this, authors need:

• correct the manuscript of the article in accordance with comments of reviewers and editors that they agree with;
• clearly state their position on the issue under consideration.

The editors of the journal facilitate the re-submission of manuscripts that could potentially be accepted, but were rejected due to the need  of  making significant changes or collecting additional data. In addition, the editors are ready to comprehensively explain the necessary corrections  to the manuscript for its acceptance for publication.

3. Editorial actions in case of plagiarism, fabrication or falsification of data

In case of detection of authors’ unfair behavior, detection of plagiarism, fabrication or falsification of data, the editorial Board is guided by the rules of COPE.

Under unscrupulous behavior by the journal "MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)" understands any actions of the authors, including improper handling of objects of study or intentional manipulation of scientific information, in which it ceases to reflect the observed research, as well as such behavior of the authors, which does not meet accepted ethical and scientific standards.

The journal "MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)" does not consider as unscrupulous behavior the following: honest errors or particular differences in the design, conduct, interpretation or evaluation of research methods or results, or unfair behavior not related to the scientific process.

4. Correcting errors and Retraction of articles

In case of errors in the text of the article that affect its perception, but do not distort the results of the study, these  may be corrected by replacing the pdf-file of the article and indicating the error in the article’s file itself and on the article page on the journal website.

In case of detection of errors in the text of the article which do distort the results of the study, or in the case of plagiarism, detection of unfair behavior of the author(s), including those associated with the falsification and/or fabrication of data, the article can be withdrawn (retracted), in accordance with the provisions of the policy of Retracted Articles of the journal "MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)".

The initiator of the retraction of the article may be the Editorials, the author, the organization, the private person. Withdrawn article are marked as "Article retracted" and on the article’s page information about the cause of the retraction of the article is provided. Information about the review article goes into databases in which the journal is indexed.

Last updated: 23.04.2025.

Author fees

Publication in the journal "MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)" is completely free of charge for the authors.

The journal doesn't have any paper processing or publishing fee.
The journal doesn't have any paper submission fee.

Last updated: 20.02.2025.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.

Conflict of interests means the conditions under which people come into conflict or competing interests that may influence the adoption of the editorial decision. Conflicts of interest can be potential or conscious, as well as real. Objectivity may be affected by personal, political, financial, scientific or religious factors.

Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers.

Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Examples of potential conflicts of interest which should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest possible stage.

In case of detection of an undeclared conflict of interest, the Editorials reserve the right to refuse the Authors the approval of the manuscript and publication of the article, as well as the right to retract the already published article.

Plagiarism detection

“MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” = “MIR (Modernizatcija. Innovatcii. Razvitie)” use native russian-language plagiarism detection software Antiplagiat to screen the submissions. If plagiarism is identified, the COPE guidelines on plagiarism will be followed.

Preprint and postprint Policy

Prior to acceptance and publication in “MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” = “MIR (Modernizatcija. Innovatcii. Razvitie)”, authors may make their submissions available as preprints on personal or public websites.

As part of submission process, authors are required to confirm that the submission has not been previously published, nor has been submitted. After a manuscript has been published in “MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)” = “MIR (Modernizatcija. Innovatcii. Razvitie)” we suggest that the link to the article on journal's website is used when the article is shared on personal or public websites.

Glossary (by SHERPA)

Retracted Articles

When submitting the article the author accepts standards of publication ethics.

Authors are expected to adhere to the ethical guidelines; infractions ethical guidelines may result in the application of sanctions by the Editor(s), including but not limited to the suspension or revocation of publishing privileges.

In the case if the Editor(s) receives alert to plagiarism or duplicate publication, or if the publication contains unethical information, the Editor can consider the necessity of the paper’s retraction.

The Editor(s) act in accordance with the rules presented by the Association of Science Editors and Publishers (ASEP).

The process of retraction includes:

1)    An author, reader, reviewer, editor or publisher alerts the Editorial Team of the case of misconduct.

2)    The Editorial Board considers and checks this information and make a decision to retract the paper or not. If the paper is to be retracted, the Editor notices the author mentioning the reasons and basis for the retraction.

3)    Notices of retraction appear both in the print and electronic versions of the Journal.

4)    The paper is retracted from all bibliographic databases, where the Journal is indexed and abstracted.

RETRACTED ARTICLE

https://www.mir-nayka.com/jour/pages/view/retract

Templates and manuals

1. For the authors

• Article template (for download)
• Example of Scientific Article
• Description of the structure of the manuscript
• Example of Tables and Figures
• Reference Examples
• Application to Copyright agreement (filled out individually by each author)

2. For the reviewers

• Review form

Last updated: 23.04.2025.