Transformation of the meso-level research landscape in economics: A systematic bibliometric review
https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2026.17.1.39-59
Abstract
Purpose: to update the methodological foundation of meso-level economics research through a systematic bibliometric analysis that identifies and structures its key thematic areas and theoretical and methodological approaches.
Methods: the paper employs a systematic bibliometric analysis using the VOSviewer tool to construct terminological maps, cluster data and analyse the dynamics of topics. The present study is grounded in a selection of publications from the Scopus database (2008–2025), which have been filtered by mention of the meso-level of economy. The methodology encompasses a retrospective analysis of the mesolevel concept evolution, the identification of central terms, and the application of а cluster analysis to terminological domains.
Results: the context of the development of meso-level economics research is defined. Eight thematic clusters reveal a paradigm shift: from static structures to dynamic transformations, and from theoretical to applied management tools. The sustainable development agenda – particularly its environmental dimension - emerges as central, enabled by digital transformation. Critical gaps include: (1) weak conceptualization of integration forms, and (2) insufficient attention to socio-demographic and geopolitical factors. Stakeholder approaches are essential for harmonizing interests in quasi-integrated structures. The meso-level is redefined as a dynamic space for harmonizing stakeholder interests and resources to enhance interorganizational efficiency.
Conclusions and Relevance: the meso-level confirms its role as a pivotal adaptation space for global crises and sustainability. Methodological pluralism and deeper theoretical integration are imperative. The future research should prioritize developing rigorous conceptual frameworks for business integration forms.
About the Author
L. A. Ramenskaya
Ural State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Lyudmila A. Ramenskaya, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Corporate Economics and Business Management
Scopus ID: 58754267400
Yekaterinburg
Competing Interests:
The author declares that there is no Conflict of Interest.
References
1. Polterovich V.M. Crisis of economics. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 1998; (1):46–66. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ijmvaj (In Russ.)
2. Davar E. Crisis of economic science: Causes and remedy. Terra Economicus. 2015; 13(2):73–83. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/udqukf (In Russ.)
3. Dopfer K., Foster J., Potts J. Micro – meso – macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2004; 14(3):263–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0193-0 (In Eng.)
4. Mesoeconomics of development. Ed. by G.B. Kleiner; Central Economics and Mathematics Institute RAS. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2011. 804 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/quxyjr (In Russ.)
5. Kleiner G.B. Ecosystem economy: step into the future. Economic Revival of Russia. 2019; (1(59)):40–45. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/yyiulj (In Russ.)
6. Taranukha Yu.V. Will mesoeconomics become a new direction in economic theory? St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies. 2022; 38(2):259–284. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/jjcozi. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2022.205 (In Russ.)
7. Maevsky V.I., Kirdina-Chandler S.G., Volynsky A.I., Kruglova M.S., Ménard C., Shastitko A.E., Koshovets O.B. et al. Mesoeconomics: Elements of a new paradigm. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2020. 392 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/rakjzp (In Russ.)
8. Klir G.J. Facets of systems science. New York: Springer, 2013. 740 р. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1331-5 (In Eng.)
9. Kirdina-Chandler S.G. Mesoeconomics and complexity economics: going beyond the limits of economic orthodoxy. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2018; 10(3):6–17. https://elibrary.ru/yawsbn. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2018.10.3.006-017 (In Russ.)
10. Stiglitz J.E. The great divide: unequal societies and what we can do about them. New York: WW Norton and Company, 2015. 464 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/greatdivideunequ0000stig_y7f7 (accessed: 01.03.2025) (In Eng.)
11. Porter M.E. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review. 1998; 76(6):77–90. URL: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=46852 (accessed: 02.03.2025) (In Eng.)
12. Srnicek N. Platform capitalism. Monograph. Moscow: National Research University "Higher School of Economics", 2019. 128 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/vrpyez (In Russ.)
13. Elsner W. Why meso? On "aggregation" and "emergence", and why and how the meso level is essential in social economics. Forum for Social Economics. 2007; 36(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12143-007-0001-3 (In Eng.)
14. Wittfogel K. A. Agrarian problems and the Moscow-peking axis. Slavic Review. 1962; 21(4):678-698. https://doi.org/10.2307/3000581 (In Eng.)
15. Cole A.H. Meso-economics: A contribution from entrepreneurial history. Explorations in Entrepreneurial History. 1968; 6(1):3–33. URL: https://www.proquest.com/openview/b03634264f5981f6c73013c9afadbd6a/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1819326 (accessed: 02.03.2025) (In Eng.)
16. Lambooy J.G. Meso-economics and organizational ecology. In: Infrastructure and the Space-Economy. Ed. by K. Peschel. Berlin: Springer, 1990. P. 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75571-2_15 (In Eng.)
17. Gareev T.R. Institutions and economic development at the sub-regional level. Social Sciences and Contemporary World. 2010; (5):45–58. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/muqzfb (In Russ.)
18. Ng Y.-K. Business confidence and depression prevention: A mesoeconomic perspective. The American Economic Review. 1992; 82(2):365–371. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117429 (accessed: 02.06.2025) (In Eng.)
19. Stewart F. Can adjustment programmes incorporate the interests of women? In: Women and Adjustment Policies in the Third World. Ed. by H. Afshar, C. Dennis. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1992. P. 13–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11961-5_2 (In Eng.)
20. Menard C. Meso-institutions: The variety of regulatory arrangements in the water sector. Utilities Policy. 2017; 49:6–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2017.05.001 (In Eng.)
21. Volynskii A.I., Gareev T.R., Dementiev V.E., Deryabina M.A., Kamko E.V., Kirdina-Chandler S.G. et al. Mesoeconomics: State and prospects. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2018. 314 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/yxgfit (In Russ.)
22. Volynskii A.I. Mesolevel in economic research: necessity or a future price for Ockham’s razor? Actual Problems of Economics and Law. 2020; 14(4):667–682. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/obeqbq. https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.14.2020.4.667-682 (In Russ.)
23. Mazzoni C. The Micro, meso, and macro relationships in economic thought and "Turning Points". In: Firms, Industries, Markets. Palgrave Macmillan, 2024. P. 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59823-4_3 (In Eng.)
24. Demyanenko A.N. Mesoeconomics... Is now about development (notes on the margins of the book "Mesoeconomics of development"). Spatial Economics. 2013; (1):144–170. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/sbppff (In Russ.)
25. Bartov O.B., Tretyakova E.A. Meso-level model of the effect of information and communication resources on the economic development of Russian regions. Economy of Regions. 2021; 17(2):402–417. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/femydr. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-2-4 (In Russ.)
26. Kruglova M.S. Mesoeconomic theory in english-scientific literature. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2017; 9(3):24–35. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/zhyvzh. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.3.024-035 (In Russ.)
27. Volynskii A.I., Kruglova M.S. Mesoeconomics: Russian and foreign view. In: Heterodoxy versus economic reductionism: micro-, meso-, macro. Moscow: Institute of Economics RAS, 2018. Р. 195–196. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/lzjnsx (In Russ.)
28. Dopfer K. The origins of meso economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2012; 22(1):133–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-011-0218-4 (In Eng.)
29. Elsner W., Heinrich T. A simple theory of "meso". On the co-evolution of institutions and platform size – With an application to varieties of capitalism and "medium-sized" countries. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2009; 38(5):843–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.05.001 (In Eng.)
30. Volynskii A.I. Mesolevel as object of research in the scientific economic literature of contemporary Russia. Journal of Institutional Studies. 2017; 9(3):36–49. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/zhyvzr. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2017.9.3.036-049 (In Russ.)
31. Elsner W. Complexity economics as heterodoxy: Theory and policy. Journal of Economic Issues. 2017; 51(4):939–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2017.1391570 (In Eng.)
32. Kleyner G.B. Mezoeconomical problems of Russian economics. Economic Herald of Rostov State University. 2003; 1(2):11–18. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/hspwen (In Russ.)
33. Van Eck N.J., Waltman L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Measuring Scholarly Impact. Ed. by Ding Y., Rousseau R., Wolfram D. Springer, 2014. P. 285–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13 (In Eng.)
34. Bascur J.P. Verberne S., Van Eck N.J., Waltman L. Which topics are best represented by science maps? An analysis of clustering effectiveness for citation and text similarity networks. Scientometrics. 2025; 130:1181– 1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05218-6 (In Eng.)
35. Bukar U.A., Sayeed M.S., Razak S.F.A., Yogarayan S., Amodu О.A., Mahmood R.A.R. A method for analyzing text using VOSviewer. MethodsX. 2023; 11:102339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102339 (In Eng.)
36. Zupic I., Čater T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods. 2015; 18(3):429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629 (In Eng.)
37. Leydesdorff L. Rafols I., Chen C. Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal–journal citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 2013; 64(12):2573–2586. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22946 (In Eng.)
38. Glänzel W., Thijs B. Using hybrid methods and "core documents" for the representation of clusters and topics: the astronomy dataset. Scientometrics. 2017; 111:1071–1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2301-6 (In Eng.)
39. Lu W., Liu Z., Huang Y., Bu Y., Li X., Cheng Q. How do authors select keywords? A preliminary study of author keyword selection behavior. Journal of Informetrics. 2020; 14(4):101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101066 (In Eng.)
40. Morioka S.N., de Carvalho M.M. A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for integrating sustainability performance into business. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016; 136(А):134–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104 (In Eng.)
41. Waltman L., van Eck N.J., Noyons E.C.M. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics. 2010; 4(4):629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002 (In Eng.)
42. Melander L., Arvidsson A. Green innovation networks: A research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 357:131926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131926 (In Eng.)
43. Möller K., Nenonen S., Storbacka K. Networks, ecosystems, fields, market systems? Making sense of the business environment. Industrial Marketing Management. 2020; 90:380–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.013 (In Eng.)
44. Vellesalu A., Hjelmgren D., Lind F. Circular product development from a multi-level perspective: Adaptations in business networks. Industrial Marketing Management. 2025; 128:88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.03.011 (In Eng.)
45. Clemens V., Wilden R., Akaka M.A., Foege J.N., Nüesch S. Multi-level value creation in the sharing economy: A configurational co-creation approach to business model development. Industrial Marketing Management. 2025; 125:272–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.01.003 (In Eng.)
46. Zhu B., Nguyen M., Siri N.S., Malik A. Towards a transformative model of circular economy for SMEs. Journal of Business Research. 2022; 144:545–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.093 (In Eng.)
47. Yu B. The impact of the internet on industrial green productivity: Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022; 177:121527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121527 (In Eng.)
48. Tang C., Xue Y., Wu H., Irfan M., Hao Y. How does telecommunications infrastructure affect eco-efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Technology in Society. 2022; 69:101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101963 (In Eng.)
49. Kouhizadeh M., Zhu Q., Sarkis J. Chapter 4: Circular economy performance evaluation with blockchain technology. In: Environmentally responsible supply chains in an era of digital transformation. Research developments and future prospects. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024. P. 58–78. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803920207.00009 (In Eng.)
50. Anastasiadis F., Apostolidou I., Tsolakis N. Challenges and opportunities of supply chain traceability: insights from emergent agri-food sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2025; 30(1):106–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-05-2024-0322 (In Eng.)
51. Wang Y., Shi M., Liu J., Zhong M., Ran R. The impact of digital-real integration on energy productivity under a multi-governance framework: The mediating role of AI and embodied technological progress. Energy Economics. 2025; 142:108167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108167 (In Eng.)
Review
For citations:
Ramenskaya L.A. Transformation of the meso-level research landscape in economics: A systematic bibliometric review. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2026;17(1):39-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2026.17.1.39-59
Views:
203
JATS XML
Email this article 