Dynamic approach to finding solutions on in-demand professions. Part 2

Purpose: to develop a dynamics approach to substantiating management decisions for in-demand professions. The second part of the article substantiates a dynamics approach to finding solutions on in-demand professions and proposes to develop a ranking draft of All-Russian Register of in-demand professions of the economic and socio-humanitarian orientation.

Methods: when displaying the relationships of the mental schemas’ elements and processing empirical data on solutions for in-demand professions, methods of formalization, gamma distribution, modeling linear regressions, ranking and grouping were used to build a draft of the ranks register of economic and socio-humanitarian orientated in-demand professions.

Results: a loopy shaped regularity of the in-demand professions changes has been revealed. It has been disclosed that decision makers accept solutions of four types for in-demand professions based on the frequency approach of the vacancy’s ratio to job seekers. The logic and analytical tools of applying a dynamic approach to finding solutions for in-demand professions are set out.

Conclusions and Relevance: at the frequency approach, stochastic transitions of quantitative changes from in-demand professions to qualitative ones (such as ordinary, then ordinary to unclaimed professions and vice versa) follow a loopy shaped regularity. The dynamics of transitions is characterized by the "vacancies" indicator, identified with the concept of "demand" for labour. The decision makers based on "loopy shaped" curve intervals of the in-demand professions take into account four types of solutions based on the ratio of vacancies to job seekers: "outstripping growth" of vacancies; compensation for the outflow of labour by an increase in the supply of vacancies; "stabilization" of vacancies supply; "shortage" of vacancies supply. The emergence of online job search sites, the need for decision makers to improve the efficiency of labour resource management form the modernization prerequisites for the methodology and tools on finding solutions to in-demand professions, including the development of new registries for them.

1. Bilal A. Theories of job loss, job finding and vacancies in the cross-section of locations: a response to Kuhn et al. (2021). Harvard University, NBER and CEPR, 2022. 5 p. URL: https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~manovski/papers/AB/Bilal_Critique_of_KMQ_09_01_22.pdf (accessed: 22.08.2024) (In Eng.)

2. Evans D., Mason C., Chen H., Reeson A. An algorithm for predicting job vacancies using online job postings in Australia. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023; 10:102. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01562-9 (In Eng.)

3. Voloshina I.A., Kozlova L.V., Novikov P.N. The model of revealing the demand for professions: key parameters and some features. Social and labor research. 2019; (4(37)):106–119. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/doppgz. https://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2019-37-4-106-119 (In Russ.)

4. Voloshina I.A., Novikov P.N., Savina N.M., Tkhorzhevskaya A.R. Monitoring system of demanded professions in the subjects of the Russian Federation: theoretical foundations and practical implementation. Monograph. Moscow: “Pero” Publishing House, 2023. 232 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/fbckjb (In Russ.)

5. Voloshina I.A., Savina N.M., Mukhina I.I. Determination of professions in demand for certain categories of workers: methodology and results. Social and labor research. 2023. (3(52)):138–152. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/pgmjgw. https://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2023-52-3-138-152 (In Russ.)

6. Farm A. A theory of vacancies. In: Working paper Series. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI), 2005. Vol. 1. 27 p. URL: https://www.su.se/polopoly_fs/1.65046.1323949624!/WP05no1.pdf (accessed: 05.09.2024) (In Eng.)

7. Holt C.C., David M.H. The concept of job vacancies in a dynamic theory of the labor market. In: The Measurement and Interpretation of Job Vacancies. NBER Chapters. Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1966. P. 73–110. URL: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c1599/c1599.pdf (accessed: 05.09.2024) (In Eng.)

8. Acemoglu D., Autor D., Hazell J., Restrepo P. artificial intelligence and jobs: evidence from online vacancies. Journal of Labor Economics. 2022; 40(S1):S293–S340. https://doi.org/10.1086/718327 (In Eng.)

9. Kapeliushnikov R.I. The Beveridge curve: what does it tell us about the stance of the Russian labor market? Journal of the New Economic Association. 2024; (4(65)):246–258. END: https://elibrary.ru/gtywhs. https://doi.org/10.31737/22212264_2024_4_246-258 (In Russ.)

10. Alekhin B.I. Beveridge curve on the labor market in Russia. Social and Labor Research. 2024; (1(54)):47–59. END: https://elibrary.ru/idzlum. https://doi.org/10.34022/2658-3712-2024-54-1-47-59 (In Rus.)

11. Leythienne J.F. Is euro area at full employment? – A diagnosis from the Beveridge curve. Economic Analysis and Policy. 2024; 81:322–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.10.003 (In Eng.)

12. Barlevy G., Faberman R.J., Hobijn B., Şahin A. The shifting reasons for Beveridge curve shifts. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2024; 38(2):83–106. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.38.2.83 (In Eng.)

13. Franz W., Smolny W. The measurement and interpretation of vacancy data and the dynamics of the Beveridge-curve: the German case. In: Working Paper. Konstanz: Diskussionspapier, 1993. Vol. 4. 30 p. https://doi.org/10419/92441 (In Eng.)

14. Kravchenko T.K., Perchikov Yu.A., Shcherbinin O.P. Features of using ordinal scales to set estimates of experts' preferences in the process of making economic decisions. Actual issues of modern science. 2011; (20):272–280. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/rdjzhn (In Russ.)

15. Mammadova M.G., Jabrayilova Z.G.K., Mammadzada F.R.O. Evaluation method of imbalance degree of supply and demand on the basis of the fuzzy mismatch scale. Educational Resources and Technologies. 2014; (4(7)):9–13. END: https://elibrary.ru/rjbsxw (In Russ.)

16. Ryabova T.V. Scale of assessment of the features of systemic decision-making. Education and self-development. 2010; (3(19)):145–150. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/pbabod (In Russ.)

17. Serenkov P.S., Romanchuk V.M., Gurevich V.L., Yanushkevich A.V. An integrated approach to identification and scaling of factor space. Methods of Quality Management. 2013; (6):30–37. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/qcsfhl (In Russ.)

18. Kikot V.Y., Gryadovoi D.I. The estimative technologies of the decision-making. Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2009; (11):13–16. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/lgkngd (In Russ.)

19. Boselli R., Cesarini M., Mercorio F., Mezzanzanica M. Classifying online job advertisements through machine learning. Future Generation Computer Systems. September. 2018; 86:319–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.03.035 (In Eng.)

20. Kurkoon P., Pimchangthong D., Boonjing V. Conceptual framework for employment paradox: attitudes of Thai business people. In: Multidisciplinary Trends in Academic Research (MTAR-2014). Bangkok: Global Illuminators, 2015. Vol. 1. P. 203–222. URL: https://globalilluminators.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/MTAR-14-211.pdf (accessed: 22.08.2024) (In Eng.)

21. Reid F.J. The paradox of unemployment and job vacancies: comment. Industrial Relations. 1977; 32(1):133–137. https://doi.org/10.7202/028769ar (In Eng.)

22. Rakhaev H.M., Toguzaev T.H., Gyatov A.V. Paradoxes and contradictions of the theory of decision-making. Administrative consulting. 2019; (8(128)):47–59. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/eivxmb. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-8-47-59 (In Russ.)

23. Kurdoglu R.S., Islam G. Eristic legitimation of controversial managerial decisions. Journal of Management Studies. 2024; 61(7):3260–3294. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13008 (In Eng.)

24. Golopuzov E.N., Shadrintsev A.I. Mathematical methods of ranking economic indicators. Economic analysis: theory and practice. 2006; (18(75)):42–53. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/huvurt (In Russ.)

25. Bassier I., Manning A., Petrongolo B. Vacancy duration and wages. In: IZA Discussion Paper Series. Bonn: Institute of Labor Economics, 2023. Vol. 16371. 47 p. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4538035 (In Eng.)

26. Sikevich Z.V. Method of semantic differential in sociological research (the experience of application). Vestnik of St. Petersburg State University. Sociology. 2016; (3):118–128. END: https://elibrary.ru/ynkqpb. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu12.2016.309 (In Russ.)