RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF BENCHMARKING METHODS OF INNOVATION SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AIMS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIETY
https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2016.7.1.104.111
Abstract
In this work, we introduce results of comparative analysis of international ratings indexes of innovation systems for their compliance with purposes of sustainable development. Purpose of this research is defining requirements to benchmarking methods of assessing national or regional innovation systems and compare them basing on assumption, that innovation system is aligned with sustainable development concept. Analysis of goal sets and concepts, which underlie observed international composite innovation indexes, comparison of their metrics and calculation techniques, allowed us to reveal opportunities and limitations of using these methods in frames of sustainable development concept. We formulated targets of innovation development on the base of innovation priorities of sustainable socio-economic development. Using comparative analysis of indexes with these targets, we revealed two methods of assessing innovation systems, maximally connected with goals of sustainable development. Nevertheless, today no any benchmarking method, which meets need of innovation systems assessing in compliance with sustainable development concept to a sufficient extent. We suggested practical directions of developing methods, assessing innovation systems in compliance with goals of societal sustainable development.
About the Author
A. Vylegzhanina
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation
10, Semakova street, Tyumen, 625003
Russian Federation
10, Semakova street, Tyumen, 625003
References
1. Edquist, C. Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges, in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Nelson, R.R. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. 2006. Norfolk, Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0007
2. Doloreux, D., Parto S. Regional innovation systems: a critical review, MERIT Working Paper. 2004 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://www.ulb.ac.be/soco/asrdlf/documents/RIS_Doloreux-Parto.pdf
3. Regional Innovation Scoreboard // European Commision, Belgium. 2014. P. 84 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://ec.europa. eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ris/ris-2014_en.pdf
4. Давыдов А.А. Инновационный потенциал России: настоящее и будущее // ФГБОУ ВПО «Институт социологии Российской академии наук» [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://http://www.isras.ru/blog_modern_3.html
5. Диденко Н.И., Скрипнюк Д.Ф. Моделирование устойчивого социально-экономического развития регионов арктического пространства РФ с использованием системы эконометрических уравнений // Стратегические приоритеты развития российской Арктики. Сборник научных трудов. ФГАОУ ВО «Санкт-петербургский государственный политехнический университет». М., 2014. С. 63–77.
6. United Nations Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals, July 2014 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/owg13.html
7. 2005 World Summit on Social Development [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://www.who.int/hiv/universalaccess2010/worldsummit.pdf.
8. Taylor A., DeRocco E.S., Andrew P.J. The Innovation Imperative in Manufacturing. How the United States Can Restore Its Edge. March 2009. The Boston Consulting Group. P. 32[Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://www.themanufacturinginstitute.org/~/media/6731673D21A64259B081AC8E083AE091.ashx
9. The Global Innovation Index 2013: The Local Dynamics of Innovation, Geneva, Ithaca, and Fontainebleau. 2013. Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO. ISSN 2263 3693.
10. The Global Innovation Index 2014: The Human Factor In innovation, Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva. 2014. Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO. ISSN 2263-3693
11. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013. 2014. OECD Publishing [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2013-en
12. Third European Report on Science & Technology Indicators 2003. Towards a knowledge-based economy. 2003. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, EC: Brussels. 2003. P. 462. ISBN 92-894-1795-1.
13. López-Claros A., Mata Y.A. Policies and Institutions underpinning country innovation: results from the Innovation Capacity Index [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://www.innovationfordevelopmentreport.org/ici.html
14. Innovation Union Scoreboard 2014. Towards a knowledge-based economy. 2014. EU, Belgium. P. 100 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation.
15. Hollanders H., Tarantola S. Innovation Union Scoreboard 2010 – Methodology report // European Commission. Janiary 2011. P. 57 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation.
16. The Global Competitiveness Report : Full Data Edition 2014–2015. World Economic Forum. Switzerland. P. 565 ISBN-13: 978-92-95044-98-2.
17. Porter M.E., Stern S. The new challenge to America’s prosperity: findings from the Innovation index. March 1999. USA. Council on Competitiveness Publications Office. P. 96. ISBN 1-889866-21-0.
18. Porter M.E., Stern S. National Innovative Capacity [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа https://www.academia.edu/2917930/National_innovative_capacity.
19. TECHBARO 2014. Academic Engineers and Architects in Finland TEK. 2015. Esa Print Oy, Lahti. P. 62. ISBN: 978-952-5633-96-2.
20. Human development report 2001. Making new technologies work for human development. New York Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001. P. 274. ISBN 0-19-521835-3.
21. Calculating the Innovation Index [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://www.statsamerica.org/innovation/innovation_index/weights.html
22. 2014 State Tech and Science Index. Enduring Lessons for the Intangible Economy. 2014 Milken Institute. P. 82 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://www.ginovus.com/the-milkeninstitutes-state-technology-and-science-index
23. 2011 NYCEDC Innovation Index. New York City Economic Development Corporation. January 1, 2011 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2591924
24. The Global Innovation Policy Index. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation and the Kauffman Foundation. March 2012. P. 136. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа http://www.itif.org
25. Innovation Indicator 2014 //Deutsche Telekom Stiftung. P. 60. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа www.innovationsindikator.de/unitedstates
26. Innovation Indicator Methodology Report. October 2011 // Deutsche Telekom Stiftung. P. 41. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа www.innovationsindikator.de/unitedstates
27. Raimund Bleischwitz, Bettina Bahn-Walkowiak, Wolfgang Irrek, Phillip Schepelmann, Friedrich Schmidt-Bleek, Stefan Giljum, Stephan Lutter, Lisa Bohunovski, Friedrich Hinterberger, Elizabeth Hawkins, Michael Kuhndt, Nadine Pratt, Arnold Black, Geert van der Veen, Birgit Eggl. Ecoinnovation: putting the EU on the path to a resource and energy efficient. Report for the the European Parliament's committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE). 2009. Forseo.
28. Hines F. and Marin O. Editorial building innovations for sustainability: 11th international conference of the greening of industry network // Business Strategy and Development. 2014. Vol. 13. Iss. 4. P. 201–208. DOI: 10.1002/bse.412
Review
For citations:
Vylegzhanina A. RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF BENCHMARKING METHODS OF INNOVATION SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AIMS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIETY. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2016;7(1(25)):104-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2016.7.1.104.111
Views:
909
Email this article 