Preview

MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)

Advanced search

Fiscal and monetary incentives for the development of companies in the technology sector of the economy

https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2026.17.2.324-338

Abstract

Purpose: to justify the need to coordinate fiscal and monetary policies in order to create a favourable environment for the development of companies in the technology sector.

Methods: the methodological basis of the study is a comprehensive interdisciplinary approach incorporating tools from behavioural economics, economic analysis, and event modeling. The computational part of the work is based on an analysis of technology companies' reactions to the Bank of Russia's key rate decisions using an abnormal return model. The empirical analysis utilized the returns of the Moscow Exchange MOEXIT index. The research objects include the shares of Ozon, YDEX (Yandex), HEAD (Headhunter), VKCO (VKontakte), POSI (the Positive Group), CNRU (Zian), ASTR (Astra Group), SOFL (Softline), DATA (the Arenadata Group).

Results: the results of the analysis show that despite increased budget support for the technology sector, budgetary funds are being utilized insignificantly, while private investor funds are declining. Furthermore, investor reactions to key rate changes are weak and statistically insignificant. This means that when fiscal and monetary impacts are multidirectional – when fiscal measures stimulate development and high interest rates simultaneously restrain it – an environment is formed in which the technology sector does not receive sufficient impulse for accelerated development.

Conclusions and Relevance: this paper substantiates the need to align fiscal and monetary policies as a key condition for effectively reorienting investment flows toward strategically important sectors that contribute to achieving technological leadership. The findings highlight the need to rethink the role of the stock market as a channel for transmitting macroeconomic incentives in the face of sanctions pressure, limited access to external financing, and the growing importance of private capital's behavioural sensitivity to state economic policy instruments.

About the Authors

S. V. Frumina
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Svetlana V. Frumina, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor; Associate Professor of the Department of Public Finance of the Faculty of Finance, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; Head of the Department of Global Financial Markets and Fintech of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Scopus ID: 57191577035

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there is no Conflict of Interest.



Saady W. Al
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation

Wesam Al Saady, Senior Lecturer, Department of Global Financial Markets and Fintech, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

Moscow


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there is no Conflict of Interest.



References

1. Bonam D., Lukkezen J. Fiscal and monetary policy coordination, macroeconomic stability, and sovereign risk premia. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 2019; 51(2-3):581–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12577 (In Eng.)

2. Salimi S., Kazinczy E., Tatay T., Amini M. Evaluating fiscal and monetary policy coordination using a Nash equilibrium: A case study of Hungary. Mathematics. 2025; 13(9):1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13091427 (In Eng.)

3. Song W., Zhao K. Navigating the innovation policy dilemma: How subnational governments balance expenditure competition pressures and long-term innovation goals. Heliyon. 2024; 10(15):e34787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34787 (In Eng.)

4. Burlachkov V.K. Coordination of budgetary and monetary policy. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2012; (10(52)):20–26. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/pevuof (In Russ.)

5. Khayrullin I.F. Proper transparency of monetary policy of central banks. Finances, Money, Investments. 2024; (4(92)):18–29. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/cezqcz. https://doi.org/10.36992/2222-0917_2024_4_18 (In Russ.)

6. Eldomiaty T., Saeed Y., Hammam R., AboulSoud S. The associations between stock prices, inflation rates, interest rates are still persistent: Empirical evidence from stock duration model. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science. 2020; 25(49):149–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-10-2018-0105 (In Eng.)

7. Wuhan, Suyuan L., Khurshid M. The effect of interest rate on investment; Empirical evidence of Jiangsu Province, China. Journal of International Studies. 2015. 8(1):81–90. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-1/7 (In Eng.)

8. Trunin P.V., Sinelnikova-Muryleva E.V., Bozhechkova A.V. Effect of high loan interest rates on the economic growth in the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 2016; 17(10):1213–1218. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/vzyxnx. https://doi.org/10.18334/rp.17.10.35293 (In Russ.)

9. Killingsworth M.A., Kahneman D., Mellers B. Income and emotional well-being: A conflict resolved. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences. 2023; 120(10):e2208661120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208661120 (In Eng.)

10. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979; 47(2):263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 (In Eng.)

11. Wei Y. The prospect theory and the stock market. Highlights in Business Economics and Management. 2023; 11:217–221. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v11i.8101 (In Eng.)

12. Chen R., Lepori G.M., Tai C-C., Sung M-C. Explaining cryptocurrency returns: A prospect theory perspective. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 2022; 79:101599. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTFIN.2022.101599 (In Eng.)

13. Ghazanvi A.I., Akram M.U. Impact of interest rate on stock market returns: A study of the Karachi stock exchange. International Journal of Business and Management. 2025; 20(2):94–104. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v20n2p94 (In Eng.)

14. Alam M.M., Gazi M. Relationship between interest rate and stock price: Empirical evidence from developed and developing countries. International Journal of Business and Management. 2006; 4(3):43–51. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v4n3p43 (In Eng.)

15. Erdogan S., Gedikli A., Çevik E.I. Volatility spillover effects between Islamic stock markets and exchange rates: Evidence from three emerging countries. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2020; 20(4):322–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.04.003 (In Eng.)

16. Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R., Balz J.P. Choice architecture. In: The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy. Ed. by E. Shafir. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013. P. 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400845347-029 (In Eng.)

17. Vedev A.L., Kovaleva M.A., Stavtseva A.A. Analysis of the impact of the processes of financial sector privatization on the development of financial markets. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3711405 (In Russ.)

18. Koziuk V.V. Coordination of fiscal and monetary policies under the conditions of globalization: integration of old and new ideas. Economic theory. 2007; 4(4):59–70. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/vpnrgr (In Russ.)

19. Khuazheva A.Sh., Kurazova D.A. Fiscal and monetary policy instruments in maintaining sustainable economic development. Scientific Review. Series 1: Economics and Law. 2024; (6):190–198. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/beihbg. https://doi.org/10.26653/2076-4650-2024-06-18 (In Russ.)

20. Ablaev E.Yu. Approaches to determining the interaction modes of budgetary – tax and monetary policy. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2025; 36(3):406–415. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/anpiwg. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700725700133 (In Eng.)

21. Ferrari M., Kearns J., Schrimpf A. Monetary policy’s rising FX impact in the era of ultra-low rates. Journal of Banking and Finance. 2021; 129:106142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106142 (In Eng.)

22. Kaya E. Accruals, cash flows and stock returns: Evidence from BIST 100. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies. 2023; 16:137–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17520843.2021.1983702 (In Eng.)

23. Vasyunina M.L. Government subsidies and stimulation of technological development. RISK: Resources, information, supply, competition. 2025; (3):27–31. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ovysms. https://doi.org/10.56584/1560-8816-2025-3-27-31 (In Russ.)

24. Vasyunina M.L. On the issue of budget subsidies for scientific and technological development. Finance. 2025; (9):11–18. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/fskjjc (In Russ.)

25. Demidova S.E. Analysis of strategic factors for ensuring technological sovereignty through an assessment of the effectiveness of innovation and the effectiveness of R&D expenditures. Review of economy, the Law and Sociology. 2025; (2):33–39. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/bjvdnv. https://doi.org/10.24412/1998-5533-2025-2-33-39 (In Russ.)

26. Lev M.Yu. Integrated inflation targeting in the context of economic security: issues of ensuring price and financial stability. Banking services. 2025; (2):9–12. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/wpkksl. https://doi.org/10.36992/2075-1915_2025_2_9 (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Frumina S.V., Al S.W. Fiscal and monetary incentives for the development of companies in the technology sector of the economy. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2026;17(2):324-338. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2026.17.2.324-338

Views: 88

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-4665 (Print)
ISSN 2411-796X (Online)