Preview

MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)

Advanced search

Modeling of the integrated system of state support for agricultural enterprises

https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2025.16.1.116-133

Abstract

Purpose: is to develop the model for comprehensive state support of enterprises in the agricultural sector, ensuring its rational structure and effective allocation of state budget resources, taking into account the rating of enterprises most in need of support, the priority of sub-sectors and allocated funds.

Methods: in the part of the study of quantitative indicators of state support for agricultural enterprises, statistical and comparative analysis was used, including a study of the structure and dynamics of the implemented measures. The model is based on the mathematical method, which involves several stages related to the evaluation of the effectiveness of the public financial support measures for agricultural enterprises by type of the measures, their usefulness in relation to specific subsectors of agriculture and individual enterprises that have received government support. To assess the extent of the impact of budget funding on the development of agricultural enterprises, statistical data of implemented programs of public financial support were used.

Results: the model of comprehensive system of state support for agricultural enterprises is proposed, which corresponds to priority areas of support and feasibility of investing in the specific enterprise. The idea of modelling is to approximate the cost structure for the implementation of support measures to the rational one. The model allows to evaluate the influence of the change in the relative weight of some parameter in the structure of state support on the general change of the parameter as a whole, thus ensuring an improvement of the efficiency of the entire agricultural sector.

Conclusions and Relevance: the recommended model is the theoretical basis for the formation of integrated state support to agricultural enterprises, allowing to define elements and depth of their necessary adjustment, leaving enough freedom for changing these values. To effectively implement the model in practice, it is advisable to provide its methodological tools that will make it possible to characterize the need for certain amounts of state support measures as for specific enterprises, and the individual regions. Such indicators will ensure the formation of ratings, which will allow to allocate funds under state support with the greatest efficiency.

About the Authors

K. A. Zakharova
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Kristina A. Zakharova, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor; Head of the Department of Economics and Finance; Leading Researcher at the Department of Economics and Finance

Researcher ID: B-8096-2016, Scopus ID: 57118103100

Tyumen 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there is no Conflict of Interest, including those related to the financial support of the Russian Scientific Foundation grant № 23-28-01690.



E. P. Kiselitsa
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Elena P. Kiselitsa, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor; Professor of the Department of Economics and Finance of the Financial and Economic Institute of Tyumen State University

Researcher ID: 007-2846378, Scopus ID: 57189302707 

Tyumen 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there is no Conflict of Interest, including those related to the financial support of the Russian Scientific Foundation grant № 23-28-01690.



N. V. Ivanova
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Nadezhda V. Ivanova, Senior Lecturer of the Department of «Economics and Finance»; Research Associate 

Researcher ID: GRO-1484-2022

Tyumen 


Competing Interests:

The authors declare that there is no Conflict of Interest, including those related to the financial support of the Russian Scientific Foundation grant № 23-28-01690.



References

1. Bayeva Sh.X. State support of small business and private entrepreneurship. Theoretical & Applied Science. 2018; (6(62)):225–229. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/usynhw. https://doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2018.06.62.39 (In Eng.)

2. Berger A.N., Udell G.F. The economics of small business finance: the roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking & Finance. 1998; 22(6–8):613–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00038-7 (In Eng.)

3. Kanter R., Boza S. Strengthening local food systems in times of concomitant global crises: reflections from Chile. American Journal of Public Health. 2020; 110(7): 971–973. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305711 (In Eng.)

4. Mosley P., Hudson J., Verschoor A. Aid, poverty reduction and the “New conditionality”. The Economic Journal. 2004; 114(496):F217–F243. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/foxzph. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00220.x (In Eng.)

5. Alston J.M., Chan-Kang C., Marra M.C., Pardey P.G., Wyatt T.J. A meta-analysis of rates of return to agricultural R&D: ex pede Herculem? International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), 2000. 148 p. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5056935_A_Meta-Analysis_of_Rates_of_Return_to_Agricultural_ RD (accessed: 04.05.2024) (In Eng.)

6. Baudron F., Liégeois F. Fixing our global agricultural system to prevent the next COVID-19. Outlook on Agriculture. 2020; 49(2):111–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727020931122 (In Eng.)

7. Béné C. Resilience of local food systems and links to food security – a review of some important concepts in the context of COVID-19 and other shocks. Food Security. 2020; 12:805–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01076-1 (In Eng.)

8. Stephens E.C., Martin G., van Wijk M., Timsina J., Snow V. Impacts of COVID-19 on agricultural and food systems worldwide and on progress to the sustainable development goals. Agricultural Systems. 2020; 183:102873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102873 (In Eng.)

9. Kiseleva T.Yu., Sanginova L.D. The model of state financial aid to business during the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia: a framework, tools, and practices. Financial analytics: science and experience. 2021; 14(2(356)):124– 140. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/bbtvit. https://doi.org/10.24891/fa.14.2.124 (In Russ.)

10. Charania I., Li X. Smart farming: agriculture's shift from a labor intensive to technology native industry. Internet of Things. 2020; 9:100142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.100142 (In Eng.)

11. Shik O.V., Ianbykh R.G. Assessment of the level of state support for the agro-industrial complex and proposals to increase its efficiency. AIC: Economics, management. 2023; (4):3–16. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/gygupw. https://doi.org/10.33305/234-3 (In Russ.)

12. Velikanova I.V. Financial and economic mechanism for stimulating the introduction of innovative technologies in flax industry. Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals. 2022; (11(226)):80–93. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/tpmzcr. https://doi.org/10.32417/1997-4868-2022-226-11-80-93 (In Russ.)

13. Prodan T.S. The main instruments of state support for the development of the agro-industrial complex. Russian Journal of Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2022; 9(2):1. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/noczqy. https://doi.org/10.15862/01ECOR222 (In Russ.)

14. Zyukin D.A., Svyatova O.V., Skripkina E.V., Latysheva Z.I., Lisitsyna Yu.V. Agribusiness development management based on state support tools. Bulletin of the Kursk State Agricultural Academy. 2022; (5):207–213. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/jdkhls (In Russ.)

15. Semin A.N., Loginov A.L., Maltsev N.V. Reserves for improving the efficiency of state support for agroindustrial based on the analysis of the cost of agricultural business. Economics of Agriculture of Russia. 2021; (9):53–58. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/dsrrss. https://doi.org/10.32651/219-53 (In Russ.)

16. Arzhantsev S.A., Pisareva L.V., Kalyazina E.V. Improving state support innovative development of agriculture. Economy, labor, management in agriculture. 2023; (2(96)):170–184. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/fqkikb. https://doi.org/10.33938/232-170

17. Khayrullina O.I. Analysis of current government support for agricultural producers. Food policy and security. 2023; 10(4):629–644. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/nreric. https://doi.org/10.18334/ppib.10.4.119511 (In Russ.)

18. Ovsyanko L.A., Chepeleva K.V., Borodina T.A., Pyzhikova N.I. Taxation system efficiency as assessed by local government authorities and AIC entities. International Agricultural Journal. 2023; 2(392):147–153. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/rwgjaa. https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2023_66_2_147 (In Russ.)

19. Aleshchenko V.V., Aleshchenko O.A., Karpov V.V., Korableva A.A., Lagzdin A.Yu., Mozzherina N.T., Khairov B.G. Improvement of the mechanism for state support of small and medium enterprises subjects: Monograph. Omsk: Publ. Center «Omsk scientific Bulletin», 2015. 188 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/tlrjcl (In Russ.)

20. Bagratuni K.Y. Aspects of state financial support for small and medium-sized businesses. Journal of Economy and entrepreneurship. 2023; (3(152)):802–808. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/tcober. https://doi.org/10.34925/EIP.2023.152.3.157 (In Russ.)

21. Kakaulina M.O., Sysoev V.D. The system of state financial support as a tool for the development of small and medium-sized businesses in the Russian Federation. Samoupravlenie. 2022; (1(129)):46–50. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ldbrgb (In Russ.)

22. Cherepanova D.M., Nikulina Yu.N., Yanbykh R.G. Assessment of the level of state support for the agrarian sector in Russia and the European Union. Agricultural science Euro-North-East. 2022; 23(5):740–750. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/izhamn. https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2022.23.5.740-750 (In Russ.)

23. Zubarev I.S. Analysis of state support for agrarian formations as an element of achieving financial independence. Agro-food economics. 2017; (5):55–60. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/yoqxdj (In Russ.)

24. Trubilin A.I. Improvement of the organizational and economic mechanism of development of the agrarian economy of the region. Monograph. Krasnodar: Kuban State Agrarian University, 2022. 204 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/cncgby (In Russ.)

25. Samarina V.P. Comprehensive overview of methods of state support of the agro-industrial complex and growth prospects of agricultural production in the conditions of a new crisis. Vestnik of Voronezh State Agrarian University. 2021; 14(2(69)):81–102. EDN https://elibrary.ru/llfkqz. https://doi.org/10.53914/issn2071-2243_2021_2_81 (In Russ.)

26. Burdelova T.N. Improvement of the mechanism of collecting windfall taxes and fees in the era of international sanctions and the growth of public spending (2023–2024). Finance: theory and practice. 2023; 27(3):115–125. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/dzhqkp. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-3-115-125 (In Russ.)

27. Petukhova Zh.G. Modeling of state support for small and medium-sized businesses. Economics: yesterday, today and tomorrow. 2016; 6(10A):289–300. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xvlwbb (In Russ.)

28. Kara-Murza S.G. The Lost Mind. Moscow: Eksmo, 2005. 735 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/qodryp (In Russ.)

29. Kuznetsov O.P. Bounded rationality and decision making. Artificial intelligence and decision making. 2019; (1):3–15. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/zawylb. https://doi.org/10.14357/20718594190101 (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Zakharova K.A., Kiselitsa E.P., Ivanova N.V. Modeling of the integrated system of state support for agricultural enterprises. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2025;16(1):116-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2025.16.1.116-133

Views: 343


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-4665 (Print)
ISSN 2411-796X (Online)