Preview

MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)

Advanced search

Digital Ecosystems as a Way to Achieve Competitive Advantages in the Financial Market: System Analysis of the Problem

https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2022.13.1.42-59

Abstract

Purpose: of this article is to study the expanding practice of applying the ecosystem approach in the business life of organizations and the degree of its impact on future transformations of the economic system. The research focuses on the segment of digital ecosystems of the banking sector related to non-financial areas of economic activity.

Methods: when preparing the article, a wide range of research methods were used – the method of systems analysis, methods of modeling and comparative historical analysis, as well as logical and inductive methods.

Results: the banking sector is actively developing the process of creating digital ecosystems used by large financial institutions as a means of achieving additional competitive advantages, as well as a tool to expand the bank's client base. Of particular interest is the expanding practice of building up these ecosystems through non-financial business areas. The results of the study also suggest the emergence of other negative consequences that hinder the effective development of the economic system. Among them: the oligopolization process on financial markets, the emergence of additional barriers to these markets, as well as the formation of oligopolistic relations in segments of economic activity that previously belonged to highly competitive sectors of the economy.

Conclusions and Relevance: digitalization is an objective trend in the development of economic relations at the present stage, however, the uncontrolled application of the digital ecosystem approach in the practice of banking institutions carries risks of further consolidation of non-competitive relations in the most important sector of the domestic economy. The banking sector is additionally due to the involvement of non-core banking assets in ecosystems, influences the establishment of such relations in sectors of the economy traditionally related to highly competitive spheres of economic activity.

About the Author

G. A. Shcherbakov
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Gennady A. Shcherbakov - Professor of the Department "System analysis in Economics", Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Economic Sciences.

49, Leningradsky  Prospekt, Moscow, 125993.


Competing Interests:

The Author declares that there is no conflicts of Interest.



References

1. Acs Z.J., Stam E., Audretsch D.B., O'Connor et alA. The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics. 2017; 1:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8 (In Eng.)

2. Sussan F., Acs Z.J. The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics. 2017; 49(5): 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9867-5 (In Eng.)

3. Burda Ye.D., Volkova I.O., Gavrikova E.V. Meaningful analysis of innovation, business and entrepreneurial ecosystem concepts. Rossijskij zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal. 2020; 18(1):73–102. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2020.104 (In Eng.)

4. Adner R. Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management. 2017; 43(1):39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451 (In Eng.)

5. Ramenskaya L.A. The concept of ecosystem in economic and management studies. Upravlenec = Manager. 2020; 11(4):16–28. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-2 (In Russ.)

6. Fadeikina N.V., Malina S.S. Development of theoretical views on the categories «ecosystem» and «innovative ecosystem». Sibirskaya finansovaya shkola = Siberian financial school. 2021; 2(142):103–111 (In Russ.)

7. Vysotskaya N.V. Ecosystem of data science as a factor in the digitalization of the transport and logistics ecosystem. In: Economics, business and logistics practice: Collection of articles based on the materials of the interuniversity scientific and practical conference. Moscow, Russian University of Transport, 2020. P. 19–24 (In Russ.)

8. Korchagina I.V., Korchagin R.L. Management of financial risks of technological entrepreneurship in the innovation ecosystem of the region. Novosibirsk, Ed. ANS «SibAK», 2019. 128 p. (in Russ.)

9. Korotkov A.V., Zobnina M.R. University Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Standards: Guidelines for Developing an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2019. 96 p. https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-1926-4 (In Russ.)

10. Gavrilov S.N., Volodina S.I. IT (digital) ecosystem of the advocacy in the context of Russian digital economy ecosystem. Aktual'nye problemy rossijskogo prava = Actual problems of Russian law. 2019; 6(103):156–166. https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.103.6.156-166 (In Russ.)

11. Moore J.F. Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review. 1993; 71(3):75–83 (In Eng.)

12. Moore J.F. The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York, HarperBusiness, 1996. 297 p. (In Eng.)

13. Kleiner G.B., Rybachuk M.A., Karpinskaya V.A. Development of ecosystems in the financial sector of Russia. Upravlenets = Manager. 2020; 11(4):2–15. https://doi:10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-1 (In Russ.)

14. Holmes C. Seeking alpha or creating beta? Charting the rise of hedge fund-based financial ecosystems. New Political Economy. 2009; 14(4):431–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460903287231 (In Eng.)

15. Berman A., Cano-Kollmann M., Mudambi R. Innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems: fintech in the financial services industry. Review of Managerial Science. 2022; 16(4):45–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00435-8 (In Eng.)

16. Svensson C., Udesen J., Webb J. Alliances in financial ecosystems: A source of organizational legitimacy for fintech startups and incumbents. Technology Innovation Management Review. 2019; 9(1):20–32. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1209 (In Eng.)

17. Palmié M., Wincent J., Parida V., Caglar U. The evolution of the financial technology ecosystem: An introduction and agenda for future research on disruptive innovations in ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020; 151(4):119779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119779 (In Eng.)

18. Brusoni S., Prencipe A. The Organization of Innovation in Ecosystems: Problem Framing, Problem Solving, and Patterns of Coupling. Advances in Strategic Management. 2013; 30:167–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-3322(2013)0000030009 (In Eng.)

19. Kraus S., Palmer C., Kailer N., Kallinger F.L., Spitzer J. Digital entrepreneurship: A research agenda on new business models for the twenty-first century. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2019; 25(2):353–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2018-0425 (In Eng.)

20. Strumeyer G., Swammy S. The capital markets: evolution of the financial ecosystem. New York, Wiley, 2017. 646 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119220589 (In Eng.)

21. Kalayda S.A. Model of creating an economic ecosystem in the framework of economic convergence under the influence of digitalization. Prikladnaya informatika = Journal of Applied Informatics. 2021; 16(6(96)):28–42. https://doi.org/10.37791/2687-0649-2021-16-6-28-42 (In Russ.)

22. Lansiti M., Levien R. The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston, Harvard Business School Press, 2004. 272 p. (in Eng.)

23. Pierce L. Big Losses in Ecosystem Niches: How Core Firm Decisions Drive Complementary Product Shakeouts. Strategic Management Journal. 2008; 30(3):323–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.736 (In Eng.)

24. Alvedalen J., Boschma R. A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European planning studies. 2017; 25(6): 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694 (In Eng.)

25. Brown R., Mason C. Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics. 2017; 49(3):11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7 (In Eng.)

26. Haldane A.G., May R.M. Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature. 2011; 469(7330):351–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09659 (In Eng.)

27. Pilyugina A.V., Yerkovich E.A. On approaches to ecosystem design digital financial services. Managing the development of large-scale systems. Materials of the 11th International Conference. Moscow, V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of management problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2018. P. 422–424 (In Russ.)

28. Koroleva E.V., Solgan L.A. Ecosystem within an ecosystem: the development of financial technologies in Russia. Finansy i kredit = Finance and credit. 2021; 27(5(809)):1116–1131. https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.27.5.1116 (In Russ.)

29. Mishchenko O.A., Privalov V.I. Bank ecosystem as a mechanism to reduce the credit risk for project financing. Ekonomika ustoychivogo razvitiya = Economics of sustainable development. 2019; 1(37):52–56 (In Russ.)

30. Zokirov M.A. Banking ecosystem: the need to build in conditions of increased competition in the retail business. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovations and investments. 2019; (9):194–197 (In Russ.)

31. Trushina K.V., Smagin A.V. The Trend for the development of the largest banks in the paradigm of ecosystem (on the concept of «ecosystems»). Bankovskie uslugi = Banking services. 2019; (12):7–11. https://doi.org/10.36992/2075-1915_2019_12_7 (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Shcherbakov G.A. Digital Ecosystems as a Way to Achieve Competitive Advantages in the Financial Market: System Analysis of the Problem. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2022;13(1):42-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2022.13.1.42-59

Views: 786


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-4665 (Print)
ISSN 2411-796X (Online)