Regional Development and Interregional Migration Decisions in Jakarta
https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.4.450-466
Abstract
Purpose: this study aims to examine the community's decision to migrate between regions in the Jabodetabek area using the KRL Commuterline public transportation and analyse regional criteria based on regional development based on Oriented Development Transit, where these criteria become integration with community movements in migrating to an area.
Methods: secondary data is used to fnd the number of people in migrating obtained from pt. Kai Indonesia. While to complete and explain each variable to be studied using primary data with several questions through a questionnaire submitted to 398 people who migrate between regions using logistic regression analysis techniques in their measurements. While to analyze the criteria for regional development in each region using an assessment approach from the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. With qualitative analysis techniques and to assist in this research, a spatial approach is used which is used to display a picture of the distribution of migration.
Results: (1) Regional development in each part of the Jabodetabek area is in the silver standard category which indicates that the regional development project has almost met the performance targets that have been conceptualized by the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. (2) People in making decisions to migrate between regions will be affected by the variables of distance, travel costs, gender, travel time, migration destination and regional development, while age and transit distance cannot provide a large enough influence on people's movements in migrating.
Conclusions and Relevance: the results of the study prove that regional development in the Jabodetabek area tends to be a non-metropolitan area where people who move prefer areas that are integrated with public facilities that lead to the destination rather than towards the metropolitan area, this is evidenced by the standard silver criteria obtained in the area in Jabodetabek.
About the Authors
. Hamzah Nurdin
Sriwijaya University (UNSRI)
Indonesia
Indonesia
Nurdin hamzah, Postgraduate Student, Faculty of Economy
Ilir Barat 1, Palembang, South Sumatera, 30128
. Sukanto
Sriwijaya University (UNSRI)
Indonesia
Indonesia
Sukanto, Doctor (Economics), Lecturer at the Faculty of Economy
Ilir Barat 1, Palembang, South Sumatera, 30128
. Yunisvita
Sriwijaya University (UNSRI)
Indonesia
Indonesia
Yunisvita, Doctor (Economics), Lecturer at the Faculty of Economy
Ilir Barat 1, Palembang, South Sumatera, 30128
References
1. Jenk M., Burgess R. Achieving Sustainable Urban Form. Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries. URBAN DESIGN International. 2000; 6(3-4). Spon Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000039
2. Firdaus F., Purwantiasning A.W., Prayogi L. Revitalization of Jakarta's Old Town Area with Alternative TOD Concepts. PROTOTYPES Journal of Architecture. 2018; 2(1):35-44. https://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/purwarupa/article/view/2901
3. Dewi H.I., Mostofa C., Riyanto T. Mixed-Use Building Concept and Central Business District for City Sustainability. National Seminar on Science and Technology. 2016; 5(November):1-10
4. Stevens J.B. The Demand For Public Goods As A Factor In Tte Nonmetropolitan Migration Turn A Round. New Directions In Urban-Rural Migration: The Population Turnaround In Rural America, 1980. pp, 115-135. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/227609
5. Wajdi N., Mulder C.H., & Adioetomo S.M. Inter-Regional Migration In Indonesia: A Micro Approach. Journal of Population Research. 2017; 34(3):253-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-017-9191-6
6. Wajdi N., Van Wissen L., Mulder C.H. Interregional Migration flows In Indonesia. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia. 2015; 30(2):371-422. https://doi.org/10.1355/SJ30-2C
7. Mulder C.H. Migration Dynamics: A Life Course Approach. Amsterdam, Thesis. 1993. https://doi.org/10.2307/2546807
8. Clemente J., Larramona G., Olmos L. Interregional Migration And Thresholds: Evidence From Spain. Spatial Economic Analysis. 2016; 11(3): 276-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2016.1153706
9. Fukurai H. Japanese Migration In Contemporary Japan: Economic Segmentation And Interprefectural Migration. Social Biology. 1991; 38(1-2):28–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.1991.9988771
10. Pregi L., Novotny L. Selective Migration of Population In Functional Urban Regions of Slovakia. Journal of Maps. 2019; 15(1):94-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2019.1661880
11. De Haas H. The Internal Dynamics of Migration Processes: A Theoretical Inquiry. Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2010; 36(10):1587-1617. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2010.489361
12. Frey W.H. Migration And Depopulation Of The Metropolis: Regional Restructuring Or Rural Renaissance. American Sociological Review. 1987; 52(2):240-257. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095452
13. Lee E.S. A Theory of Migration. Demographics. 1996; 3(1):47-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060063
14. Cervero R., Murphy S., Ferrell C., Goguts N., Tsai Y.-H. TCRP Report 102 – Transit-Oriented Development In The United States: Experiences, Challenges, And Prospects (E. Robert, J. Skinner (eds.)). Library of Congress, he Federal Transit Administration in Cooperation with the Transit Development Corporation. 2004. https://doi.org/10.17226/23360
15. Cervero R., Kockelman K. Travel Demand And The 3Ds: Density, Diversity, And Design. Pergamon. 1997; 2(97):199-219
16. Cervero R. TCRP Report 102 – Transit-Oriented Development In The United States: Experiences, Challenges, And Prospects. In 102 (P. 1-534). Transportation Research Board. 2004. https:// doi.org/10.17226/23360
17. Grigg D.B. EG Ravenstein And The “Laws Of Migration.” Journal Of Historical Geography. 1997; 3(1):41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-7488(77)90143-8
18. Untermann R.K., Lewicki L. Accommodating The Pedestrian: Adapting Towns And Neighborhoods For Walking And Bicycling. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1984.
19. Calthorpe P. City of San Diego Transit-Oriented Development Design Guidelines. In: M.V. Rollinger, J. William Schempers (Eds.), Calthorpe Associates (1st ed.). Planning department office of the city architect, 1992. URL: https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/legacy/planning/community/profiles/southeasternsd/pdf/transitorienteddevelopmentdesignguidelines1992.pdf
20. John B. Urban Transport Planning Theory and Practice. London: Croom Helm Ltd, 1981. 248 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-6228(81)90017-5
21. Bourne L.S. Internal Structure Of The City: Readings On Urban Form, Growth, And Policy (2 ed.). Oxford University Press. 1982. URL:https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Internal-structure-of-the-city-%3A-readings-onurban-Bourne/89609d1584457db7f25eec31b06f5d5e5df3a561#paper-header
22. Ortuzar J. de D., Willumsen L.G. Modeling Transport. Oxford University Press. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119993308
23. Renaissance Planning. A Framework For Transit Oriented Development In Florida. 2011. (961,525/5631; Vol. 1)
24. Stillwell J.C.H. Monitoring Intercensal Migration In The United Kingdom. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 1994; 26(11):1711-1730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X9402601103
25. Fotheringham A.S., Lu B., Charlton M., Harris P. Geographically weighted Regression With A Non-Euclidean Distance Metric: A Case Study Using Hedonic House Price Data. International Journal Of Geographical Information Science. 2002; 28(4):660-681. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2013.865739
26. Sjaastad L.A. The Costs and Returns of Human Migration. Journal of Political Economy. 1962; 70(5):80-93. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1829105
27. Roseman C.C. Migration As A Spatial And Temporal Process. Annals Of The Association Of American Geographers. 1971; 61(3):589-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1971.tb00809.x
28. Alonso W. Location and Land Use. Location and Land Use. 2013; 6(1):16-18. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674730854
29. Martin P.L., Taylor J.E. The Anatomy Of A Migration Hump. In Development Strategy Employment And Migration: Insights From Models. OECD; 1996. URL: https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/BLCP%3ACN013903627
30. Ye R., De Vos J., Ma L. Analysing The Association Of Dissonance Between Actual And Ideal Commute Time And Commute Satisfaction. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2020; 132(May 2019):47-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.10.011
31. Taki H.M., Maatouk M.M.H. Promoting Transit Oriented Development Typology InThe Transportation Planning. Communications in Science and Technology. 2018; 3(2):64-70. https://doi.org/10.21924/cst.3.2.2018.103
32. Staricco L., Vitale Brovarone E. Promoting TOD Through Regional Planning. A Comparative Analysis Of Two European Approaches. Journal of Transport Geography. 2018; 66(May 2017):45-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.011
33. Zhang Y., Song R., van Nes R., He S., & Yin W. Identifying Urban Structure Based On Transit Oriented Development. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2019; 11(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11247241
34. Han F., Xie R., Lai M. Traffic Density, Congestion Externalities, And Urbanization In China. Spatial Economic Analysis. 2018; 13(4):400-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2018.1459045
35. Beenstock M. Aggregate Supply In Spatial General Equilibrium Theory. Spatial Economic Analysis. 2020; 15(4):374-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2020.1742928
36. Credit K. Transitive Properties: A Spatial Econometric Analysis Of New Business Creation Around Transit. Spatial Economic Analysis. 2019; 14(1):26-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2019.1523548
37. Cazzuffi C., Modrego F. Place Of Origin And Internal Migration Decisions In Mexico. Spatial Economic Analysis. 2018; 13(1):80-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2017.1369148
38. Lima R.C. de A., Silveira Neto R. Patterns of Urban Land Use in a Developing Country: The Role of Transport Infrastructure and Natural Amenities in Brazil. Spatial Economic Analysis. 2020; 15(4):441-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2020.1749336
39. Cattaneo M., Malighetti P., Morlotti C., Paleari S. (2018). Students Mobility Attitudes And Sustainable Transport Mode Choice. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2018; 19(5):942-962. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-08-2017-0134
40. Brutus S., Javadian R., Panaccio A.J. Cycling, Car, or Public Transit: A Study of Stress and Mood Upon Arrival at Work. International Journal of Workplace Health Management. 2017; 10(1):13-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-10-2015-0059
41. Carlsson M., Reshid A.A., Rooth D.O. Neighborhood Signaling Effects, Commuting Time, and Employment: Evidence From a Field Experiment. International Journal of Manpower. 2018; 39(4):534-549. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2017-0234
42. Lomax N., Norman P., Darlington-Pollock F. Defining distance thresholds for migration research. Population, Space and Place. 2021; 27(4):1-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2440
43. Sen S., Charles M.B., Harrison J.L. Determinants of Commute Distance in South East Queensland, Australia: Implications for Usage-based Pricing in Lower-density Urban Settings. Urban Policy and Research. 2021; 39(3):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2021.1922376
44. Azhar S. Class Analysis of the Experience of Migration during the Partition of India. South Asia: Journal of South Asia Studies. 2020; 43(3):407-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2020.1738109
45. Poot J. Cross-border migration and travel: A virtuous relationship. IZA World of Labor, October. 2015. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.209
46. Zhao H., Liu N., Wang J. Effects of human capital difference on migration destination preference of rural floating population in China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy. 2019; 24(4):595-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860,2019.1641356
47. Marta J., Fauzi A., Juanda B., Rustiadi E. Understanding migration motives and its impact on household welfare: evidence from rural–urban migration in Indonesia. Regional Studies, Regional Science. 2020; 7(1):118-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2020.1746194
48. Davis B., Winters P. Gender, networks and Mexico-US migration. Journal of Development Studies. 2018; 38(2):1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380412331322251
49. Kambuata A.E., Masinambow V., Sumual J. Analysis of the Variables (Factors) That Affect the Demand for City Transportation Services in Malalayang District, Manado City. Scientific Journal of Efficiency. 2019; 19(01):10-19.
50. Rakhmatulloh A.R., Kusumo Dewi D.I. Development of Pedestrian Paths in the Tod Dukuh Atas area of Jakarta. Journal of Urban Development. 2020; 8(2):132-141. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.8.2.132-141
51. Regmi M., Paudel KP, Bhattarai K. Migration decisions and destination choices. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy. 2020; 25(2):197-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860,2019.1643195
52. Adwiluvito H. Determinants of Transportation Modes for Jabodetabek Commuter Workers Using Multinomial Multilevel Logistics Regression Model. Indonesian Journal of Statistics and Its Applications. 2019; 3(1):49-61. https://doi.org/10.29244/ijsa.v3i1.184
53. Todaro M.P., Smith S.C. Economic Development. The Addison-Wesley Series in Economics. 2015.
Review
For citations:
Hamzah Nurdin , Sukanto , Yunisvita Regional Development and Interregional Migration Decisions in Jakarta. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2021;12(4):450-466. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.4.450-466
Views:
488
Email this article 