The Concept of Sustainable Mobility in Modern Megacities
https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.3.288-305
Abstract
Purpose: to formulate the general conception of sustainable mobility management in modern cities based on an analysis of the main approaches to the management of the development of sustainable mobility.
Methods: the study is based on the application of systems analysis methods. The analysis is based on open sources information such as scientific articles, legal and regulatory acts, official strategic planning documents, analytical and methodical materials of Russian and international conferences. The article also includes the results of the author's empirical research conducted.
Results: an analysis of the development of sustainable transport mobility in large cities and current strategies for its further formation was carried out. It allowed identifying the main elements of the conceptual model of the development of transport mobility. The research defines the structure of an adaptive system for sustainable mobility management, which would form a basis for developing a sustainable mobility concept to effectively organize various stakeholders' cooperation.
Conclusions and Relevance: local solutions for transportation mobility may not be practical or can lead to a conflict of interests. That calls for the complex approach to forming sustainable mobility as a feature of a city transportation system to satisfy the demand for mobility to increase the quality of life in the cities. The conceptual basis for the development of sustainable mobility consists of goal setting, planning, collaboration, implementation, usage.
The effective management of sustainable mobility can be achieved by implementing digital analytical platforms, working as a single ecosystem. Developing such an ecosystem can be time-consuming and directly influenced by technological, infrastructural, legal, and economic factors. The most urgent is to redesign the existing mobility patterns to achieve the environmental goals, the higher quality of life of city residents, the engagement of different stakeholders in sustainable mobility development.
About the Author
D. V. Zavyalov
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Head of the Department of Entrepreneurship and Logistics, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Assistant Professor,
36, Stremyanny lane, Moscow, 117997
References
1. Black J.A., Paez A., Suthanaya P.A. Sustainable urban transportation: performance indicators and some analytical approaches. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 2002; 128(4):184–209. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2002)128:4(184) (In Eng.)
2. Johansson S. Conceptualizing and Measuring Quality of Life for National Policy. FIFF Working Paper Series. 2001; (171):1–16. URL: https://swopec.hhs.se/fiefwp/papers/WP171.pdf (In Eng.)
3. Salomon I., Feitelson E., Cohen G., Moeckel R., Spiekermann K., Wegener M. Sustainable Mobility in Cities: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis / Final Report to the German-Israeli Foundation for the Advancement of Science (G.I.F.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-610. URL: https://eldorado.tudortmund.de/handle/2003/26583 (In Eng.)
4. Zilbertal A.H. Problems of urban passenger transport. Moscow-Leningrad: Gostransizdat, 1937. 272 p. (In Russ.)
5. Sheleikhovsky G.V. Composition of the city plan as a problem of transport. Moscow: GIPROGOR, 1946. 129 p. (In Russ.)
6. Yakshin A.M. Planning of transport networks: Experience of urban planning research. Moscow: State Architectural Publishing House, 1946. 88 p. (In Russ.)
7. Polyakov A.A. Urban traffic and street layout. MoscowLeningrad: State Publishing House of Literature on Construction and Architecture, 1953. 252 p. (In Russ.)
8. Downs A. The law of peak-hour expressway congestion. Traffic Quarterly. 1962; 16(3):393– 409. URL: https://www.econbiz.de/Record/thelaw-of-peak-hour-expressway-congestion-downsanthony/10002085409 (In Eng.)
9. Jeon C.M., Amekudzi A. Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: definitions, indicators and metrics. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. 2005; 11(1):31–50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:1(31) (In Eng.)
10. Afimeimounga H., Solomon W., Ziedins I. The DownsThomson Paradox: Existence, Uniqueness and Stability of User Equilibria. Queueing Systems. 2005; 49(3):321–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11134-005-6970-0 (In Eng.)
11. Lee D. Transit cost and performance measurement. Transport Reviews. 1989; 9(2):147–170. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01441648908716717 (In Eng.)
12. Gutierrez P.J. Accessibility indicators for public transport in rural areas: proposing a methodology. Estudios Geograficos. 1991; 52(203):205–221. URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2- s2.0-0026270543&partnerID=40&md5=09455b9db20a7fabe0b0f065ac683cb6 (In Espan.)
13. Lejda K., Mądziel M., Siedlecka S., Zielińska E. The future of public transport in light of solutions for sustainable transport development. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport. 2017; (95):97–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2017.95.10 (In Eng.)
14. Rau H., Scheiner J. Sustainable Mobility: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Sustainability. 2020; 12(23):1–6. DOI: 10.3390/su12239995 (In Eng.)
15. Jacyna M., Wasiak M., Lewczuk K., Grzegorz K. Noise and environmental pollution from transport: decisive problems in developing ecologically efficient transport systems. Journal of Vibroengineering. 19(7):5639–5655. DOI: 10.21595/jve.2017.19371 (In Eng.)
16. Levy J.I., Buonocore J.J., Von Stackelberg K. Evaluation of the public health impacts of traffic congestion: a health risk assessment. Environmental Health. 2010; 9(65):65. DOI:10.1186/1476-069X-9-65 (In Eng.)
17. Khorasani Gh., Tatari A., Yadollahi A., Rahimi M. Evaluation of Intelligent Transport System in Road Safety. International Journal of Chemical, Environmental & Biological Sciences (IJCEBS). 2012; 1(1). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309189024_Evaluation_of_Intelligent_Transport_System_in_Road_Safety (In Eng.)
18. Kahloul L., Pierre Castagna Farhan Atallah Salem. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). In Conference: Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). IEEE ICALT’2020, Strasbourg, France. URL: https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/338825875_Intelligent_Transportation_Systems_ITS (In Eng.)
19. Gonzalez-Feliu J., Pronello C., Grau J.M.S. Multistakeholder collaboration in urban transport: state-of-the-artand research opportunities. Transport. 2018; 33(4):1079–1094. DOI: 10.3846/transport.2018.6810 (In Eng.)
20. Gil A., Calado H., Benz J. Public participation in municipal transport planning processes – the case of the sustainable mobility plan of Ponta Delgada, Azores, Portugal. Journal of Transport Geography. 2011; 19(6):1059–1628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.06.010 (In Eng.)
Review
For citations:
Zavyalov D.V. The Concept of Sustainable Mobility in Modern Megacities. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2021;12(3):288-305. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.3.288-305
Views:
646
Email this article 