Features of the Strategy of Integration Development of the Eurasian Economic Union

Purpose of the article is to consider the features of the integration development of the Eurasian economic Union and identify possible priority strategic directions.

Methods: the presented study is based on a systematic approach. Such universal methods of scientific knowledge as analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction are applied. The elements of comparative, strategic, functional and economic analysis are used. Analytical documents of the Eurasian economic Commission, EAEU statistics, profile and thematic reports were used as materials for the work.

Results: the study reveals the goals set by the participating countries of modern world integration associations. The motives that induce different states to form economic unions are considered. Negative trends in the development of modern integration processes in countries with developing economies are revealed. The reasons impeding the expected efficiency of their integration are highlighted. The existing models for the implementation of economic strategies that are used today in most integration communities are analyzed. These models make it possible to make the best use of existing competitive advantages and unlock the potential of the participating countries. Special attention is paid to the study of the features of the integration processes of the Eurasian economic Union, which directly affect the possibilities of its development. The approach of the governing body of the EAEU, the Eurasian Economic Commission, to the development of the development strategy of the association is considered. Priority directions on the basis of perspective industries are recommended. Their joint development will allow the most effective disclosure of the competitive potential of the Eurasian economic Union in the framework of the chosen strategy.

Conclusions and Relevance: for the successful development of the EAEU, it is necessary to refer to the experience of existing models for the implementation of integration potential. Today for the union it is advisable to use elements of practically all variants of strategies in various combinations and apply them to the selected list of priority industries. Currently, the main task of the leadership of the EAEU states is a joint compromise definition of strategic development directions. At the same time, it is important that all participating countries in the process of implementing the strategy contribute to the removal of barriers that impede the effective development of the identified strategic directions.

1. Viner J. The Customs Union Issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1950. Available from: https://openlibrary.org/books/OL18850383M/The_customs_union_issue (In Eng.)

2. Balassa B. The Theory of Economic Integration. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin. 1961. 304 р. Available from: https://archive.org/details/theoryofeconomic0000bala (In Eng.)

3. Lawrence R.Z. Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration. Cambridge: Brookings Institution Press, 1996. 192 р. Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/book/regionalism-multinationalism-and-deeper-integration/ (In Eng.)

4. Bergsten C.F. Open regionalism. The World Economy . 1997; 20(5):545–565. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/worlde/v20y1997i5p545-565.html (In Eng.)

5. Bergsten C.F. Open regionalism. Working paper . 1997. № 97-3. The Peterson Institute for International Economics. Available from: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/iiewpaper/wp97-3.htm (In Eng.)

6. Shishkov Yu.V. Integration and disintegration: correction of the concept. World economy and international relations . 1993; (10):50–68 (In Russ.)

7. Shishkov Yu.V. Integration processes on the threshold of the XXI century. Why are the CIS countries not integrating? Monograph. Moscow: NP “III Millennium”, 2001. 480 p. (In Russ.)

8. Shpolyanskaya A.A. Innovation development in integration union (by the example of EU). Kant . 2016. (2(19)):135–142 (In Russ.)

9. Shakhovskaya L.S., Matkovskaya Ya.S. Integration associations in contemporary global economy: Global trends and opportunities for using them for purposes of Russia's economic security. National interests: priorities and security . 2017; 13(4(349)):736–747. https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.13.4.736 (In Russ.)

10. Likhacheva A.B. Eurasian Economic Union and Integration Process in the Asia-Pacific. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law. 2019; 12(1):69–85. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-1-69-85 (In Russ.)

11. Feofanov K.A., Sologub V.I. The Eurasian Economic Union: the newest integration start. Social and humanitarian knowledge . 2017; (5):175–188 (In Russ.)

12. Osadchaya G.I. The Methodology for Monitoring the Integration Processes in the Eurasian Economic Union. Social Policy and Sociology . 2018; 17(4(129)):110–117. https://doi.org/10.17922/2071-3665-2018-17-4-110-117 (In Russ.)

13. Osadchaya G.I. Eurasian economic union: first results of integration processes. Sociological Almanac . 2017; (8):49–62 (In Russ.)

14. Elistratova V.V. Eurasian Economic Union: problems of integration development. Theory and Practice of the restoration of rights . 2018; (1(8)):11–16 (In Russ.)

15. Medvedeva A.E. Modern trends of development of the integration processes of the Eurasian Economic Union. Chronoeconomics . 2018; (3(11)):114–118 (In Russ.)

16. Valovaya M.D. The Prospects of the Eurasian Economic Union in the Framework of the Global integration megatrends. International Trade and Trade Policy . 2017; (3(11)):43–55 (In Russ.)

17. Valovaya M.D., Rozhanskaya E.A., Kolchina E.A. The main development trends of the Eurasian Economic Union in the context of the integration development megaprojects. Plekhanov Scientific Bulletin. 2017; (1(11)):35–42 (In Russ.)

18. Kalmykov S.P., Plotnikov V.S. The Eurasian Economic Union as a manifestation of regional integration processes. Innovations and Investments. 2018; (3):57–60 (In Russ.)

19. Ushkalova D.I. Integration models of the Eurasian economic union and the free trade zone of the cis in the context of international experience. The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences . 2017; (6):100–111 (In Russ.)

20. Abramov V.L. Integration effects of mutual and foreign trade of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union: state and growth factors. Eurasian Union: issues of international relations . 2018; (3(25)):64–73 (In Russ.)

21. Butorina O.V., Zakharov A.V. Scientific basis of the Eurasian Economic Union. Eurasian Economic Integration . 2015; 2(27):52–68 (In Russ.)

22. Khapilin S.A. Priorities of cooperation of the Eurasian Economic Union member states in the context of common economic space formation. Finance and Credit . 2016; (40(712)):33–41 (In Russ.)

23. Bondarenko T.G., Kulov A.R. Objective conditions and directions of formation of development of STP of agriculture in member states of the Eurasian Economic Union. Scientific result. Economic research. 2017; 3(3):21–30. https://doi.org/10.18413/2409-1634-2017-3-3-21-30 (In Russ.)

24. Siptits S.O., Romanenko I.A., Evdokimova N.E. Scenario Forecasts for The Impact of Integration Processes on Food Markets of The Eurasian Economic Union. Problems of forecasting. 2019; (1(172)):142–153 (In Russ.)

25. Glittova Y., Toropygin A.V. Perspectives of Co-Operation between the Baltic Countries and the Eurasian Economic Union Member States in the Context of Eurasian Integration Process. Management Consulting. 2019; (1(121)):40–53. https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-1-40-53 (In Russ.)

26. Krasavina L.N., Lukyanovich N.V. Integration Interaction of the States Parties of the Eurasian Economic Union as a Factor in Ensuring their National Economic Security. World of the New Economy. 2017; (4):55–62 (In Russ.)

27. Volovik N. Revitalization of the Eurasian Economic Union Integration Cooperation with Third Countries. Economic Development of Russia . 2017; (24):7–12 (In Russ.)

28. Markusenka M.V. Financial integration mechanisms of interaction between countries of the Eurasian Economic Union. Actual scientific researches in the modern world . 2017; (3-4(23)):115–119 (In Russ.)

29. Ovsepyan M.L. Political and economic development of the Republic of Armenia before integration into the Customs Union and the Eurasian economic Union. Humanities. Bulletin of the Financial University . 2018; 8(3(33)):70–73. https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-3-70-73 (In Russ.)

30. Baktybekov M.B. Modern integration questions of the Eurasian Economic Union and Kazakhstan. Altai Bulletin of State and Municipal Service. 2019; (17)17)):45–47 (In Russ.)

31. Xianju W. Russia's Attitude toward Integration, Strategies for the construction of the Eurasian Economic Union and the Economic Belt of the Silk Road. Bulletin of the East Siberian Open Academy . 2018; (28(28)):3 (In Russ.)

32. Bereznyakov D.V., Kozlov S.V. Projecting the Development Strategy of the Eurasian Economic Union through the Prism of the International Relations'' Alliance Theory. Tomsk State University Bulletin. History. 2017; (50):58–63. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/50/8 (In Russ.)

33. Basenko А.M., Ishanov I.V. Strategy for the integration of development and functioning of the customs Union within the EURASEC. Bulletin of the Rostov State Economic University (RINH). 2015; 3(51):57–63 (In Russ.)

34. Shelegeda B.G., Kornev M.N., Sharnopolskaya O.N. Optimization model of multi-vector integration strategy of economic development. Economic and humanitarian Sciences. 2016; 3(290):73–84 (In Russ.)

35. Kurennaya V.V. Integration processes as a tool for implementing the development strategy of the oilseed subcomplex. Bulletin of SevKavGTI. 2017; (1(28)):25–31 (In Russ.)