Increasing the "Productivity" of the Academic Sector and Ensuring Cooperation with the Large Corporate Sector in Japan

Purpose: the main purpose of this article is to review the Japanese policy to promote cooperation between the academic and large corporate sectors in the field of science and technology, and to analyze its role in the formation of the innovation system in Japan.

Methods: this article is based on the analysis of scientific and analytical materials on the problem of research. The factual basis is the framework documents of the Cabinet of Japan.

Results: the article provides a brief retrospective review on the support policy for universities and large corporate sector cooperation, identifies the key factors for the establishment of intersectoral cooperation; identifies the problem areas of the implemented policy that hinder the achievement of the set goals. The relative failure of the applied measures in the sphere of venture business support, commercialization of technologies and other instruments was noted. The hypothesis is put forward about the insufficiency of government efforts to monitor and analyze the activities already implemented, the lack of practice of taking into account failures in the formation of new programs and projects. Also revealed contradictions between the support programs implemented through various government agencies, which also leads to the inefficiency of scientific and technological projects and the establishment of dialogue with the corporate sector, including the need to resolve bureaucratic disagreements. It is also necessary to emphasize, that Japanese experience in implementing of science and technology and innovation policy is very important for Russian economic development. In particular, special attention is paid to study foreign experience in creating an effective mechanism of academic and private sectors interaction, where the key-supporting role is played by government in case of Japan. No doubt, it is not justified to try to copy any foreign institutional system, but the analysis of the negative and positive effects of foreign economic system cases is very valuable for self-institutional mechanisms development.

Conclusions and Relevance: the analysis leads to the conclusion that Japan has not yet completed the transformation to a modern model of the national innovation system, the current problem is the weakness of relations between the academic and corporate sectors. At the same time, there is an excessive, "paternalistic" role of the state in the organization of intersectoral interactions, in the absence of attention to the optimization of conditions and incentives for this kind of dialogue. The Japanese government actively supports and tries to develop the practice of "open innovation" business model, but due to the obsolescence of existing institutional structures, as well as their unpreparedness to the development and perception of radically new business models, has not yet been able to achieve concrete sustainable results.

1. Tatsuno Sh. The technopolis strategy: Japan, high technology, and the control of the twenty-first century. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Publ., 1986. 320 p. (Russ. ed.: Tatsuno, Sh. Strategiya – tekhnopolisy. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1989. 344 p.).

2. Zaitsev V.K. Creative destruction in Japanese / Pacific Asia: The economic and political consequences of the global financial crisis. Moscow: IMEIMO RAS, 2010. pp. 42–57 (in Russ.)

3. Leontieva E.L. The Economic Policy of Shinzo Abe Cabinet under Globalization. Yearbook Japan. 2016; 45:79–105 (in Russ.)

4. Leontieva E.L. A New Change in Economic Policy of Shinzo Abe Cabinet. A Search of Way Out. Actual problems of modern Japan. 2015; (29):71–84 (in Russ.)

5. Chufrin G.I., Mikheev V.V., Amirov V.B., Andreeva N.V., Berger Ya.M., Borokh O.N., Gelbras V.G., Dvoryankin P.A., Kunadze G.F., Leonteva E.L., Lomanov A.V., Luzyanin S.G., Potapov M.A., Ramzes V.B., Ryabov A.V. China and Japan: Globalization of Economy, Politics and Security Interests. World economy and international relations. 2007; (8):83–93 (in Russ.)

6. Timonina I.L. Japanese Strategy of Innovative Development: Towards the Fourth Industrial Revolution. East. Afro-Asian societies: history and modernity. 2017; (4):128–142. DOI: 10.7868/S0869190817040136 (in Russ.)

7. Varnavskiy V.G. Partnership of state and private sector. Forms, projects, risks. Monograph. Moscow: Science. 2005. 315 p. (in Russ.)

8. Ito T., Kaneta T., Sundstrom S. Does university entrepreneurship work in Japan? A comparison of industry–university research funding and technology transfer activities between the UK and Japan. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2016; 5:8. Available from: doi:10.1186/s13731-016-0037-9 (in Eng.)

9. Dasher R., Harada N., Hoshi T., Kushida E., Okazaki T. Institutional Foundations for Innovation-Based Econo mic Growth. Report prepared for the National Institute for Research Advancement (NIRA), 2015. Available from: http://www.nira.or.jp/pdf/e_1503report.pdf (in Eng.)

10. Komiyama Hiroshi. “New Growth Strategy of Japan”: Goals and Objectives. Innovative Trends. 2010; (1):18 (in Russ.)

11. Kalyatin V., Naumov V., Nikiforova T. Europe, US and India Experience in innovation public support. Russian Juridical Journal. 2011; 1(76):171–183 (in Russ.)

12. Berkovitz J., Feldman M. Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2006; 31(1):175–188. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10961-005-5029-z (in Eng.)

13. Cuplan R. Open Innovation through Strategic Alliances. Approaches for Product, Technology, and Business Model Creation. NY, 2014. pp. 253–275. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137394507 (in Eng.)

14. Hajime E. Obstacles to emergence of high/new technology parks, ventures and clusters in Japan. 2005; 72(3):359–373. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.008 (in Eng.)

15. Kondo M. Policy Innovation in Science and Technology in Japan – from S&T Policy to Innovation Policy (in Japanese). Journal of Science Policy and Research Management. 19(3/4):132–140 (in Eng.)

16. Motohashi K. University–industry collaborations in Japan: the role of new technology-based firms in transforming the national innovation system. Research Policy. 2005; 34(5):583–594. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v34y2005i5p583-594.html (in Eng.)

17. Motohashi K., Muramatsu Sh. Examining the Univertsity Industry Collaboration Policy in Japan: Patent analisys. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.642.4827&rep=rep1&type=pdf (in Eng.)

18. Nakagawa K., Takata M., Kato K., Matsuyuki T., Matsuhashi T. A university–industry collaborative entrepreneurship education program as a trading zone: the case of Osaka university. Technology Innovation Management Review. 2017; 7(6):38–49. Available from: https://doaj.org/article/0cf4f95e49eb43efa851d4d766afe996 (in Eng.)

19. Abe H. Trends in University’s IP Strategy and a Vision for the Future. Keynote lecture, 2015. Available from: https://www.jst.go.jp/sicp/ws2015_most/presentation/keynotelecture1.pdf (in Eng.)

20. 21st Century Innovation Systems for Japan and the United States: Lessons from a Decade of Change: Report of a Symposium. National Research Council, 2009. Available from: http://www.nap.edu (in Eng.)

21. Abenomics’ ‘third arrow’ key to revitalising Japan’s economy. Press Release, OECD, 2015. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/newsroom/abenomicsthird-arrow-key-to-revitalising-japans-economy.htm (in Eng.)

22. Achievements in three years of Abenomics, 2016. Available from: http://www5.cao.go.jp/keizai1/2016/achievements.pdf (in Eng.)

23. Industry-Academia Collaborations for Open Innovation in Japan: OECD's latest survey as seen in cases from the United States and Europe. 2016. Available from: https://www.rieti.go.jp/en/events/bbl/16110101.html (in Eng.)

24. Riney J. Corporate venture capital is King in Japan, Techcrunch. 2015. Available from: https://techcrunch.com/2015/08/13/in-japan-corporateventure-capital-is-king/ (in Eng.)