National Experience in Scientific Production Organization and Opportunities of its Application from the Standpoint of Lean Manufacturing

Purpose: the article presents the results of a comparative study of the achievements of the leading Russian scientific schools, which stood at the origins of the scientific production organization. The main purpose of the study is to find out which theories of national scientific schools in the field of production organization appeared at the beginning of the 20th century have remained relevant until now and can be developed in our days. First of all, these theories were considered from the standpoint of the lean manufacturing concept usage, not only for material products, but for information products as well.

Methods: the analysis and synthesis, as well as the method of analogies were used as the main methods of this scientific research.

Results: the conducted research proved that almost in all researches of the production organization in 20–30 years of XX century, as a rule, the vector of influence of human resources on the manufacturing process was implicitly present. However, at that time, the dominant role was played by the production of material economic products with a small part of the intellectual component in their structure (compared to nowadays), while today the intellectual component became incomparably larger. The result of the study was also a modified version of the Japanese concept of «4M» on the role of materials, machine, man and method of labor management with the addition of the 5th «M» (mentality – a mental state), which allows to evaluate also the intellectual and creative (intangible) component of the production process. For the first time it is offered to consider and investigate possibilities of use in practice of human resources management the concept of "intellectual and creative attitudes" as the factor defining the degree of predisposition of the worker to use his intellectual potential through the required level of the creative abilities at production of information economy products.

Conclusions and Relevance: it was shown that the subject of the in-depth research is not material products, but the information economy products, in the production of which the logic of providing the necessary information becomes crucial, taking into consideration the formation of confiding relations between the management of enterprises and their employees.

1. Koritsky E.B. (Ed.) The origins of scientific management. Forgotten discussions and unrealized ideas. Leningrad, Publishing Leningrad state University, 1990. 336 p. (in Russ.)336 p. (in Russ.)

2. Gastev A.K. Working attitudes. 3rd edition. Gastev Y.A., Petrova E.V. (eds.) Moscow, Book house "LIBROKOM", 2011. 344 p. (in Russ.)

3. Kerzhentsev P.M. Time-scientific management-communism. Time. 1923; (1):4 (in Russ.)

4. Kerzhentsev P.M. The Struggle for time. M.: Economics, 1965 (in Russ.)

5. Ohno T. Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production, Productivity Press. 1988. 152 p. (in Eng.)

6. Gastev A.K. Our tasks. Labour organization. 1921; (1):27–30 (in Russ.)

7. Kerzhentsev P. M. Principles of the organization. M.: Economics, 1968. 464 p. (in Russ.)

8. Reznik Y.M. Social engineering: subject area and limits of application. Social engineering. 1994; (2):87–96 (in Russ.)

9. Classic Drucker: Wisdom from Peter Drucker from the Pages of Harvard Business Review, 2006. 240 p. (in Eng.)

10. The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer by Jeffrey K. Liker. McGraw-Hill Education, 2004. 352 р. (in Eng.)

11. Rokhlov M.N. Some aspects of interaction between higher education institution and industrial enterprises. Young scientist. 2009; 3: 83–84 (in Russ.)

12. Kerzhentsev P.M. Scientific management on the economic edge. Time. 1924; (4):4 (in Russ.)

13. Gastev A.K. How to work: The practical introduction to the science of labor organization. 3rd ed. / edited by Bakhrakh N.M. etc., M.: Book house "LIBROKOM", 2011. 480 p. (in Russ.)

14. Ermansky O.A. Scientific organization of labor and production and Taylor's system. 4th ed. M.: State publishing house, 1925. 399 p. (in Russ.) nality criteria. For rationalization. 1928; (2) (in Russ.)

15. Ermansky O.A. About the rationality criteria. For rationalization. 1928; (2) (in Russ.)

16. Burdensky I.M. Against the mechanistic rationalization. The fallacy and harmfulness of the rationalization "theory" of O. Ermansky. Problems of Economics. 1930; (3) (in Russ.)

17. Álvarez R. и др. Redesigning an assembly line through lean manufacturing tools. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2009; 43:949–958. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s0017000817722 (in Eng.)

18. Büyüközkan G., Kayakutlu G., Karakadılar I.S. Assessment of lean manufacturing effect on business performance using Bayesian Belief Networks. Expert Systems with Applications. 2015; 42:6539– 6551. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.016 (in Eng.)

19. Oleghe O., Salonitis K. Variation modeling of lean manufacturing performance using fuzzy logic based quantitative lean index. Procedia CIRP. 2016; 41:608–613. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.008 (in Eng.)

20. Behrouzi F., Wong K.Y. Lean performance evaluation of manufacturing systems: A dynamic and innovative approach. Procedia Computer Science. 2011; (3):388–395. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.065 (in Eng.)

21. Delgoshaei A., Gomes C. A multi layer perceptron for scheduling cellular manufacturing systems in the presence of unreliable machines and uncertain cost. Applied Soft Computing. 2016; 49:27–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.06.025 (in Eng.)

22. Alhuraish I., Robledo C., Kobi A. Assessment of Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma operation with Decision Making Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2016; 49(12):59–64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.550 (in Eng.)

23. Burdensky I.M. Rationalization and engineering. Bulletin of the Kazan Institute of scientific labor organization. 1929; (5):3 (in Russ.)

24. Ermansky O.A. Tasks of the scientific organization of labor and its state. Bulletin of socialist Academy. 1923; (3):173 (in Russ.)

25. Behrendt A., Müller N., Odenwälder P., Schmitz C. Industry 4.0 demystified – lean’s next level. McKinsey. 2017. 4 р. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/industry-4-0-demystified-leans-next-level (in Eng.)

26. Rozmirovich E.F. Scientific management, RKI and party. Moscow, 1926. 209 p. (in Russ.)

27. Rozmirovich E.F. General provisions on the rationalization of state management. Management techniques. 1926; (7):14 (in Russ.)

28. Scheel O., etc. Digital Lean: The Next Stage in the Operations Optimization. A. T. Kearney. 2015:7 (in Eng.)

29. Bollard A., etc. The next-generation operating model for the digital world. McKinsey. 2017:1–8 (in Eng.)

30. Alicke K., Rexhausen D., Seyfert A. Supply Chain Chain 4.0 in consumer goods. McKinsey. 2017:1–11 (in Eng.)

31. Yang T. Lean production system design for fishing net manufacturing using lean principles and simulation optimization. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2015; 34:66–73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.11.010 (in Eng.)

32. Sutari O. Process Improvement using Lean Principles on the Manufacturing of Wind Turbine Components – a Case Study. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2015:3429–3437. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.318 (in Eng.)

33. Kennedy I., Plunkett A., Heidi J. Implementation of lean Principles in a Food Manufacturing Company. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. 2013:1579–1590. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00557-7_127 (in Eng.)

34. Das B., Venkatadri U., Pandey P. Applying lean manufacturing system to improving productivity of airconditioning coil manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2014; 71:307–323. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5407-x (in Eng.)

35. De Felice F., Petrillo A., Monfreda S. Improving Operations Performance with World Class Manufacturing Technique: A Case in Automotive Industry. Operations Management. 2013. Available from: doi:10.5772/54450 (in Eng.)

36. Vitke N.A. Production organization and industrial development. Moscow, 1925. 72 p. (in Russ.)

37. Vitke N.A. Organizational issues of modern scientific management. Scientific organization of management techniques. 1924:22 (in Russ.)