Preview

MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)

Advanced search

DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF SUBSIDIARY LIABILITY AS A TOOL TO INCREASE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INSTITUTION OF BANKRUPTCY AND ENSURE THE ECONOMIC SECURITY OF THE COUNTRY

https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2018.9.3.460-474

Abstract

Purpose: the main purpose of the article is to investigate modern problems of the institution of bankruptcy and the impact of its results on the system of economic security of the state, to develop recommendations for improving the institution of bankruptcy and the concept of subsidiary liability. To achieve the goal, the following problems are solved in the article: the definition of theoretical and practical aspects, the generalization of processes for the formation and development of the concept of subsidiary liability of an unscrupulous controlling the debtor’s persons; the analysis of practical problems of realization of the concept of subsidiary responsibility of an unscrupulous controlling the debtor’s persons; a study of the Russian and foreign practice of implementing the institution of bankruptcy and subsidiary liability unscrupulous controlling the debtor’s persons; the formation of proposals on the development of the concept of subsidiary liability of an unscrupulous debtor controlling the debtor as a tool to increase the eficiency of the institution of bankruptcy and ensure economic security.

Methods: methods the article is based on a systematic approach to the definition and formation of the concept of subsidiary responsibility, theoretical, economic and functional analysis of the complex interaction of the main participants of the institution of bankruptcy and the impact of their activities on the economic security of the country.

Results: the increase in the number of illegal actions in bankruptcy cases led to the need in the last decade to strengthen the economic (subsidiary) responsibility of the debtor controlling the debtor. The author summarizes the theoretical and practical aspects of regulating the subsidiary responsibility of an unscrupulous controlling debtor for improper actions in the bankruptcy of the debtor in the concept of subsidiary liability. The study showed that the formed concept of subsidiary liability and the new rules adopted in 2017 for the subsidiary liability of the debtor controlling persons significantly increased the risk of bringing to account those who use the scheme to terminate the company without going through a formal bankruptcy procedure. However, the effectiveness of these measures remains insuficient, there are gaps in the implementation of the concept. In the work on the basis of practical experience of the application of the concept of subsidiary responsibility in Russia and foreign experience, proposals have been made to improve the concept, their implementation along with other proposals for the modernization of the institution of bankruptcy will increase the eficiency of the institution of bankruptcy and prevent emerging crisis phenomena in the economy, stabilize the financial situation of business entities and ensure the economic security of the country.

Conclusions and relevance: the conducted research shows the importance of the concept of subsidiary liability in ensuring the effectiveness of the institution of bankruptcy and economic security of the country. The conducted analysis of foreign practice confirms the need to regulate the institution of bankruptcy of economic and legal responsibility of the controlling debtor for bringing the debtor to bankruptcy and wrongful actions in bankruptcy. The proposed directions for improving the concept of subsidiary liability provide an opportunity for its development, in terms of increasing the responsibility of persons involved in the bankruptcy case, for improper acts in bankruptcy.

About the Authors

V. N. Alferov
Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation.
Russian Federation

Valery N.Alferov,Associate Professoro f the Department of Management, Candidate of Economic Sciences.

49, Leningradsky avenue, Moscow, 125993.



M. M. Korigova
IT-company “GreenData”.
Russian Federation

Maryam M. Korigova, analyst. 

31, Belinsky str., Perm, 614002. 



References

1. Bogdanov E.V. Features of challenging transactions of legal entities by an arbitration manager in a bankruptcy case and an arbitration manager of a legal entity. Advocate = Lawyer. 2015; (10):8–13 (in Russ.)

2. Dorokhina Ye.G. Control and Supervision Function of Public Administration in Bankruptcy of Organizations. Jurist. 2012; (11):7–9 (in Russ.)

3. Kantser Yu.A. Involvement of vicarious liability of controlling persons of debtor in bankruptcy case. Society: politics, economics, law. 2011; (4):128–134 (in Russ.)

4. Kochetkov E.P. Improving the efficiency of rehabilitation potential bankruptcy procedures in Russia. Business Strategies. 2017; (2(34)):25–29 (in Russ.)

5. Kolesnikova E.N. On the subsidiary responsibility of the persons controlling the debtor organization. Financial Bulletin: Finance, Taxes, Insurance, Accounting. 2017; (12):20–25 (in Russ.)

6. Kravchenko A.A. On the responsibility for dishonesty in insolvency (bankruptcy) relations. Entrepreneurship. 2015; (2)10–17 (in Russ.)

7. Kovan S.E. Problems of development of the rehabilitation potential of the institution of bankruptcy. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2014; (2(83)):64–75 (in Russ.)

8. Soldatenkov V.Yu. Deliberate bankruptcy of the debtor: what should creditors do? Tax policy and practice. 2011; (9):14–17 (in Russ.)

9. Tarasyuk I.M. Subsidiary responsibility of persons supervising the debtor in the bankruptcy case. Arbitration disputes. 2016; (4):15–25 (in Russ.)

10. Pustylnick I. Use of Z-Score in Detection of Revenue Manipulations (March 12, 2015). 21st International Conference on Economics and Management. Brno, Czech Republic (2016). Available from: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2577473 or doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2577473 (in Eng.)

11. Rachappa Shette, Sudershan Kuntluru, Sunder Ram Korivi. Opportunistic earnings management during initial public offerings: evidence from India. Review of Accounting and Finance. 2016; 15(3):352–371. Available from: doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-03-2015-0048 (in Eng.)

12. Tarjo N.H. Application of Beneish M-Score models and data mining to detect financial fraud. Paper presented at the 2nd Global Conference on Business and Social Sciences (GCBSS-2015) on “ ultidisciplinary

13. Scott D. Dyreng, Michelle Hanlon and Edward L. Maydew. The Effects of Executives on Corporate Tax Avoidance. The Accounting Review: July 2010; 85(4):1163–1189. Available from: doi:https://doi. org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1163 (in Eng.)

14. Fich, Eliezer M. and Shivdasani, Anil. Financial Fraud, Director Reputation, and Shareholder Wealth (April 17, 2006). AFA 2006 Boston Meetings Paper. Available from: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=687412 or doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.687412 (in Eng.)

15. Dyreng, Scott and Hanlon, Michelle and Maydew, Edward L. The Effects of Executives on Corporate Tax Avoidance (September 9, 2009). Available from: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1158060 or doi:http:// dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1158060 (in Eng.)

16. Franceschetti B.M., Koschtial C. Do bankrupt companies manipulate earnings more than the non-bankrupt ones? Journal of Finance and Accountancy. 2013. 12 (in Eng.)

17. Kurbatov A.Ya. Subsidiary responsibility of the organization's participants in its bankruptcy. Economic Law. 2015; (3):34–39(in Russ.)

18. Ryakhovskaya A., Kovan S. Anti-crisis management: a modern concept and the main instrumentarium. Management Science. 2015; 5(3):45–55. Available from: doi:https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-20 15--3-45-55 (in Russ.)

19. Shevchenko I.M., Tarasyuk I.M. Subsidiary responsibility of persons supervising the debtor in the case of bankruptcy for the absence of accounting and reporting documents, the presence of incomplete or distorted information in them. Arbitration disputes. 2015; (3)5–20 (in Russ.)

20. Vandekerckhove K. Piercing the Corporate Veil. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2007. 788 с. (in Eng.)

21. Budylin S.L., Ivanets Yu.L. Tearing the veils. The doctrine of lifting the corporate veil in foreign countries and in Russia. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii = Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federatio . 2013; (7):80–125 (in Russ.)

22. Grechnev A.V. The problem of "piercing the corporate veil" in the Russian and French law: a comparative analysis. Voprosy rossiiskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava = Matters of Russian and International Law. 2016; (1):69–83 (in Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Alferov V.N., Korigova M.M. DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPT OF SUBSIDIARY LIABILITY AS A TOOL TO INCREASE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE INSTITUTION OF BANKRUPTCY AND ENSURE THE ECONOMIC SECURITY OF THE COUNTRY. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2018;9(3):460-474. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2018.9.3.460-474

Views: 1368


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-4665 (Print)
ISSN 2411-796X (Online)