WAYS AND FACTORS THAT ENSURE THE TRANSITION OF THE ECONOMY OF THE MACRO-REGION TO A NEW TECHNOLOGICAL STRUCTURE
https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2018.9.2.200-212
Abstract
Purpose: the purpose of the article is to study the state of technological structures of the subjects of the macroregion, to determine the factors influencing its formation and development, to justify the ways of modernization of technological development.
Methods: the methodological base of the research is based on the use of a systematic approach and General scientific methods: scientific abstraction, analysis and synthesis, generalization, system-structural analysis.
Results: the analysis of the state of technological structures of the studied macroregion is carried out, the dominant structures are identified, the factors, among which are investments, commissioning of fixed assets and the level of education, which influence the formation and development of the technological structure, are considered. The direct correlation of the increasing level of technological structure with the increase of the educational level of the employed in the economy is revealed. The possible ways of technological development modernization for the macroregion are determined on the basis of the selection of the catching-up and advanced development strategy.
Conclusions and Relevance: the main result of the research is the conclusion that the knowledge of the state of the technological structure of the region will allow to outline the strategy of its development, that the high educational level of the employed in the economy and social sphere will allow the region to move more rapidly to a higher technological structure. The implementation of the catch-up and advanced development strategy is designed to implement technological innovations that should lead to increased productivity, renewal of fixed capital and competitiveness, which will change the structure of the economy, to determine the most important areas of its modernization.
About the Author
G. H. BatovRussian Federation
Gumar H. Batov, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Institute of Informatics and problems of regional management
37A, I. Armand street, Nalchik, Kabardino-Balkaria Republic, 360004
References
1. Rifkin J. The third industrial revolution: How lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. N.Y.: St. Martin's Griffin Publ., 2013. 304 p. (Russ. ed.: Rifkin, J. Tret'ya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya. Kak gorizontal'nye vzaimodeystviya menyayut energetiku, ekonomiku i mir v tselom. Moscow: Alpina Publ., 2017. 410 p.)
2. Belyakov S.A., Shpak A.S. Assessment of researches and technological development of the regions of the Siberian Federal district. Fundamental research. 2014; (6-2):293-297 (in Russ.)
3. Kondratyev N.D. Large cycles of conjuncture and the theory of foresight: selected works. Moscow: Economy; 2002. 767 p. (in Russ.)
4. Lvov D.S. The management of technical development. Moscow: Economy; 1990. 255 p. (in Russ.)
5. Glazyev S.Y. Strategy of priority development of Russia in conditions of global crisis. Moscow: Economy; 2010. 255 p. (in Russ.)
6. Moskvina O.S. Determination of the level of technological structure in the economy of the region. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk state University. Economy. 2010; (2(23)):52-58 (in Russ.)
7. Prudnikova L.V. Assesment of the innovation processes and structure of technological set-up in the industry. Bulletin of Vitebsk state technological University. 2012; (22):151-162 (in Russ.)
8. Zdorova L.P. Sixth technological order: the last Kondratiev cycle. In: innovations in science: collected articles on the mater. Proceedings of LV International Scientific.-Prakt. Conf. № 3 (52). Part II. Novosibirsk: Sibak; 2016. p. 140-148 (in Russ.)
9. Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. By Carlota Perez. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar; 2002. p. xix, 198 (in Eng.)
10. Freeman C. The National System of Innovation in Historical Perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 1995; (19):5—24. Available from: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:cambj e:v:19:y:1995:i:1:p:5-24 (in Eng.)
11. Rodrik D. Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Prognosis. 2007; (3):211 —261 (in Russ.)
12. Komkov N.I. Scientific and technological development: Limitations and opportunities. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2017; 28(5):472-479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700717050094 (in Eng.)
13. Tatarkin A., Romanova O., Akberdina V. Technological and spatial possibilities of the new industrialization of industrial regions. Federalism. 2014; (3(75):45-56 (in Russ.)
14. 14 Knyaginin V.N., Movily V.V., Fadeev V.Yu. Prospects of scientific and technological development of regions of the Russian Federation. Science, innovations. Education. 2008; (5):201 — 218 (in Russ.)
15. Sirotin V.D. The Development of Methodological Approach to Change in Technological Shape of Basic Branch of Industrial Region. Journal of economic theory. 2016; (2):173—177 (in Russ.)
16. Ioda Yu.V., Suleymanova L.R-K. I nfluence of technological ways on innovative development of territories. Socio-economic phenomena and processes. 2015; 10(6):44-50 (in Russ.)
17. Greenberg R.S. Economy of modern Russia: state, issues, prospects. Bulletin of the Institute of Economics RAS. 2015; (1):10—29 (in Russ.)
18. Gubanov S.S. Sovereign breakthrough. Neoindustrialization of Russia and its vertical integration ("Superpower"Series). Moscow: Book World; 2012. 224 p. (in Russ.)
19. Leonard C. Spatial development and innovations in Russia. Foresight and STI Governance. 2016; 10(3):30-33. DOI: 10.17323/1995-459X.2016.3.30.33 (in Russ.)
20. Tulchinskaya Y.I., Kurochkin D.S. Method of evaluation of the level of technological way of the country. Science and education: economy; enterprise; law and management. 2013; 5(36):2027 (in Russ.)
21. Schwab K. The Fourth industrial revolution. Moscow: EXMO, 2016. 208 p. (in Russ.)
22. Nazarova E.A. The Mixed economy and technical and innovative potential of economic development of Russia. Problems of modern economy. 2007; 3(23):69-72 (in Russ.)
23. Zeynalov R.A. The impact of the development of the industrial base in the industrial potential of the region. Modern problems of science and education. 2014; (5):340 (in Russ.)
24. Krylova I.A. The role of science in the modernization of the Russian economy. Philosophical Sciences. 2011; (10):21-33 (in Russ.)
25. Komkov N.I. Complex forecast of scientific and technological development: Experience and lessons learned. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2014; 25(2):111-121. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1134/S1075700714020051 (in Eng.)
26. Reinert E.S. How rich countries got rich... And Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/afco.235.0152 (in Eng.)
27. Solovieva Yu. Formation and Development of Technology Transfer System in Russia and Abroad. Questions of economy. 2015; (4):131 —141 (in Russ.)
28. Evstigneeva L.P., Evstigneev R.N. Catching up development: modern interpretation. Moscow: Institute of Economics RAS, 2012. 45 p. (In Russ.)
29. Daron Acemoglu, James A. Robinson. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. London: Profile Books, 2012. xi, 529 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859013000023
Review
For citations:
Batov G.H. WAYS AND FACTORS THAT ENSURE THE TRANSITION OF THE ECONOMY OF THE MACRO-REGION TO A NEW TECHNOLOGICAL STRUCTURE. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2018;9(2):200-212. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2018.9.2.200-212