PRIORITIES AND MAIN TOOLS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY OF RUSSIA
https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2018.9.2.192-199
Abstract
Purpose: the purpose of the article is to identify the main tools for the development of the digital economy of Russia. The article explores the priorities and the main tools for the development of Russia's digital economy, as well as problems that hamper the acceleration of these processes. Approaches to the definition of a digitization index, as well as regulatory and legal aspects of the regulation of the digital economy, are considered. The substantiation of the account of foreign experience in the decision of the revealed problems is given. "Digital privatization', "digital leap", "self-digitalization"and "digital reinvestment".
Methods: during the research, the main sources of the initial data were the data of consulting agencies, foreign static bureaus, fundamental and applied works of authoritative scientists in the field of digital economy. The research is based on theoretical methods of scientific knowledge, in particular, the use of methods of synthesis and deduction, as well as methods of empirical cognition, which have revealed many problems of the development of the digital economy and the tools that help to solve them.
Results: an analysis of the challenges of the economic and technological order in Russia has been carried out and the role of digitalization in these processes has been revealed. Based on a comparison of the indicators of the new technological revolution of Russia with the countries leaders in this field, it was revealed that the share of the digital economy in Russia today is about 4% in the country's GDP, and in the future up to 10% of GDP growth in Russia and for this it is necessary that the Government of the Russian Federation continued the development of digital services, co-financing of promising projects and increasing digital literacy of the population. Instruments for the development of Russia's digital economy, such as digital privatization, digital leap, self-digitalization, and digital reinvestment, were proposed.
Conclusions and Relevance: the tools proposed in this study for the development of the digital economy make it possible to intensify the processes of building up the economic potential for a technological breakthrough. Subsequently, they will be transformed into a set of recommendations for practice and government authorities and allow them to change some laws in the field of high technology and innovation support, as well as to adjust the directions of strategic development of economic institutions and forecast models of economic development.
About the Authors
M. Ya. VeselovskyRussian Federation
Mikhail Ya. Veselovsky, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor,
Scopus ID: 56087785600, Researcher ID: B-6487-2017
42, Gagarina street, Moscow region, Korolev, 141070
M. A. Izmailova
Russian Federation
Marina A. Izmailova, Professor, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Assistant Professor,
Scopus ID: 57189310428
49, Leningradsky avenue, Moscow, 125993
M. S. Abrashkin
Russian Federation
Mikhail S. Abrashkin, Candidate of Economic Sciences,
Scopus ID: 56439995600
42, Gagarina street, Moscow region, Korolev, 141070
References
1. Veselovsky M.Y., Vilisov V.Y., Bank et al. Sovershenstvovanie mehanizmov povyshenija innovacionnoj aktivnosti promyshlennyh predprijatij [Perfection of mechanisms of increase of innovative activity of industrial enterprises]. Moscow: Publishing House Scientific Adviser, 2017. 304 p. (in Russ.)
2. Grebenyuk A.Yu., Matich L.Yu., Popov V.O., Ravin N.V., and etc. Prognoz nauchno-tehnologicheskogo razvitija Rossii: 2030 [Forecast of scientific and technological development of Russia: 2030]. L.M. Gokhberg, M.P. Kirpichnikova (eds.). Moscow: Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, National Research University "Higher School of Economics", 2014. 48 p. (in Russ.)
3. Marsh P. The new industrial revolution: Consumers, globalization and the end of mass production. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press Publ., 2013. 320 p. (Russ. ed.: Marsh, P. Novaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya. Potrebiteli, globalizatsiya i konets massovogo proizvodstva. Moscow: Gaydar Inst. Publ., 2015. 424 p.)
4. Novaja tehnologicheskaja revoljucija: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti dlja Rossii: jekspertno-analiticheskij doklad [The New Technological Revolution: Challenges and Opportunities for Russia: An Expert-Analytical Report]. Centr strategicheskih razrabotok [Center for Strategic Research]. Available from: https://www.csr.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/novaya-tehnologicheskaya-revolutsiya-2017-10-13.pdf (Accessed 3th March 2018) (in Russ.)
5. Choudary Sangeet Paul, Parker Geoffrey G., Van Alstyne Marshall W. Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy And How to Make Them Work. W. W. Norton & Company; 1 edition (March 28, 2016), 352 p. (in Eng.)
6. Schwab K. The fourth industrial revolution. N.Y.: Crown Business Publ., 2016. 198 p. (Russ. ed.: Schwab, K. Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 2017. 208 p.)
7. Ansell C., & Gash A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008; 18(4):543-571, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032 (in Eng.)
8. Executive Office of the President, US National Science and Technology Council. A National Strategic Plan for Advanced Manufacturing. Available from: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sitesusa/wp-content/uploads/sites/802/2017/10/nstc_feb2012.pdf [Accessed 1st October 2016] (in Eng.)
9. European Commission. International Digital Economy and Society Index (I-DESI). Available from: http://unctad.org/meetings/fr/Presentati-on/dtl_eweek2016_AMateus_en.pdf [Accessed 1st October 2016] (in Eng.)
10. Hermann M., Pentek T., Otto B. Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios. Jan 2016 in 2016, 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2016. p. 3928-3937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2016.488 (in Eng.)
11. Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, ..., and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge Based Economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2012; 3(1):25-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4 (in Eng.)
12. McKinsey & Company. Beating the lowproductivity trap: How to transform construction operations. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projectsand-infrastructure/our-insights/beating-the-low-productivity-trap-how-to-transform-construction-operations [Accessed 1st July 2016] (in Eng.)
13. Moskowitz Sanford L. The Advanced Materials Revolution: Technology and Economic Growth in the Age of Globalization. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 2014. 250 p. (in Eng.)
14. Schuh G., Potente T., Wesch-Potente C., Weber A.R., Prote J.-P. Collaboration Mechanisms to increase Productivity in the Context of Industrie 4.0, Procedia CIRP. Vol. 19. 2014. p. 51-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.05.016 (in Eng.)
15. Koshkin Ruslan P. Digital economy is a new stage in the development of the information society in Russia. Strategicheskie prioritety = Strategic Priorities. 2017; (3(15)):4-15 (in Russ.)
16. Tsvetkov V.A., Stepnov I.M., Kovalchuk Yu. Implementation of the new industrialization strategy in the economy. The Bulletin of the Financial Academy = Finance: Theory and Practice. 2016; 20(6(96)):19-30 (in Russ.)
17. Ershov M.V., Tatuzov V.Yu., Tanasova A.S. Results of 2017: Some trends in the dynamics of the world and Russian financial indicators. Finansy: teoriya i praktika = Finance: Theory and Practice. 2018; 22(2):38-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2018-22-2-3853 (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Veselovsky M.Ya., Izmailova M.A., Abrashkin M.S. PRIORITIES AND MAIN TOOLS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY OF RUSSIA. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2018;9(2):192-199. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2018.9.2.192-199