Systemic-Functional Approach to Utilities Supplys

Purpose: the purpose of the article consists in statement of management approach to development of utilities supply processes based on conflict situations decision – making search. It had appeared in the period of the transition from the planned and directive management to market development. Methods: the research methodology is based on the system analysis of full life cycle processes functioning, forecasting of complex systems development, mathematical modeling of processes of services supply and innovative and investment projects modeling as well as development of supplying services processes. Results: the results of the work are concentrated in the presentation of systemic-functional approach to managing the development of processes of municipal services, able to resolve conflict situations in this sphere. Conclusions and Relevance: the traditional management approach on the basis of elimination of "bottlenecks" and emergencies prevailing within planned and directive system at its transformation in the market conditions has led to accumulation of conflict situations and unsolvable problems. The offered systemic-functional approach based on forecasting of full life cycle of the modernized processes and the services providing systems allows to consider costs of modernization, prime cost and quality of the rendered services.

1. Restoration of Economic Growth in Russia. Scientific Report of ECFOR RAS / Ivanter V.V., etc. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2016; 5(158):3–17 (in Russ.)

2. Metodicheskie i organizacionnye osnovy upravleniya razvitiem kompanij [Methodological and organizational basis for development management of companies] / N.I. Komkov, N.N. Bondareva, V.S. Romantsov M.: Izdatel'skij dom "Nauka" [Publishing house «Science»], 2015. 520 p. (in Russ.)

3. Innovative public-private partnerships to address environmental and energy problems in terms of integration into the world economy / Usmanova T.H., Hasanova A.I., Khairullina, L.I. Rossijskij ehkonomicheskij internet-zhurnal = Russian economic Internet magazine. 2017; 1:38. (in Russ.)

4. Kameneva E., Dolgov D. Matrix of investment appeal management of the housing-municipal complex. Management and Business Administration. 2015; 1:170–180 (in Russ.)

5. Salygin V.I., Guliyev I.A., Mustafinov R.K. Sustainable development and current state of electric power industry of the EU member states. Risk Management. 2017; 1(81):42–50 (in Russ.)

6. Trachuk A.V., Linder N.V., Zubakin V.A., Zolotova I.Yu., Volodin Yu.V. Perekrestnoe subsidirovanie v elektroenergetike: problemy i puti resheniya [Cross Subsidizing in Energy Industry: Problems and Solutions]. St. Petersburg, 2017. 121 p. (in Russ.)

7. Aganbegyan A. How to Improve Russian Budget? Ekonomicheskaya Politika. 2015; 10(4):7–19 (in Russ.)

8. Yershov M., Tanasova A., Tatuzov V. Changes in the federal budget for the 2015–2017 biennium. Economist. 2015; 6:37–47 (in Russ.)

9. Leksin V.N., Porfiryev B.N. Organizational issues of expert review and evaluation of macroregional development projects in Russia. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2016; 27(6):621–628. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1134/S1075700716060095 (in Eng.)

10. Leksin V.N., Porfiryev B.N. Evaluation of the effectiveness of government programs of socioeconomic development of regions of Russia. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2016; 27(4):418–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/ S1075700716040109 (in Eng.)

11. Savelyeva Yu.V., Savelyeva M.Yu. Concept of programme budgeting: implementation problems and perspectives. Management of economic systems. Scientific electronic journal. 2014; 11(71):33–46 (in Russ.)

12. Senchagov V.K. National structural policies - the way to economic security. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences. 2015; 5:64–70 (in Russ.)

13. Mirkin Y. (ed.). Financial strategy of modernization of economy: World practice. Moscow: Master, 2014 (in Russ.)

14. Shirov A.A. Role of instrumental methods of analysis and forecasting for substantiating economic policy. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2017; 28(2):121–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/ S1075700717020095 (in Eng.)

15. Yuzhakov V., Dobrolyubova E., Alexandrov O. How to Evaluate Public Programs Effectiveness: Issues of Methodology. Economic Policy. 2015; 10(6):79–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2015-6-04 (in Russ.)

16. Podinovsky V.V., Gavrilov V.M. Optimizatsiya po posledovatel'no primenyaemym kriteriyam [Optimization by Consistently Applied Criteria]. M.: Sovetskoe radio [Soviet radio], 1975. 192 p.

17. Becker S., Schober D., Wassermann S. How to approach consumers’ nonmonetary evaluation of electricity supply security? The case of Germany from a multidisciplinary perspective. Utilities Policy. Oct 2016; 42:74–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jup.2016.06.012 (in Eng.)

18. Kosar Darivandi Shoushtari. Redesigning a Large Supply Chain Management System to Reduce the Government Administration: A Socio-Functional Systems Approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research. 2012; 26(2):195–216. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/s11213-012-9244-x (in Eng.)