Modernization of the Russian Automobile Road Network on the Base of Innovative Technologies. Part 2

Purpose: the authors aim to show the reality of the decision of the actual task putted by the Russian President V.V. Putin to transport builders: two times increasing construction of automobile roads and to ground fundamental principles of the Russian automobile roads network technological modernization, allowing solving the modern requirements of automobile transport.
Methods: in the present study the following methods were used: systemic approach, methods of social diagnosis, comparative analysis, method of expert evaluations, and method of statistical processing of information.
Results: the short characteristic of modern development and technical level of the Russian automobile roads network as the important part of the automobile roads material-technical base is presented. Realization process of the actual task putted by Russian President V.V. Putin to transport builders: two times increasing construction of automobile roads is analyzed. The reality of decision this task due to modernization roads economy material-technical base on the base of innovative technologies and progressive world experience in the field of roads construction is scientifically proved.
Conclusions and Relevance: in spite of losing now in decision of the actual task putted by Russian President V.V. Putin to transport builders: two times increasing construction of automobile roads, nevertheless the real possibilities to reach the important aim still remain. It may be done only due to scientifically grounded modernization of the roads economy material-technical base on the base of innovative technologies and progressive world experience in the field of roads construction.

1. Nazarbaev N. Transportnaya_otrasl_dolzhna_stat_odnim iz draiverov rosta nashih URL: https://i-news.kz/news/2016/10/04/8390092- html (in Russ.)

2. Gorizonty transporta: Effektivnaja transpotnaja politika. Ekspertnyj sovet Komiteta SF po promyshlennoi politike. Chelaybinsk: Socium, 2008. URL: http://mybrary.ru/users/personal/read/gorizontyi-transporta-effektivnayatransportnaya-politika/ (in Russ.)

3. Prognoz razvitiay avtomobilnogo transporta I dorozhnogo hozayistva. NC КТP. М., 2009 (in Russ.)

4. Sostoaynie avtomobilnogo transporta I dorozhnogo hozayistva. GP Rosdornii. М., 2009 (in Russ.)

5. Kuzyk B.N., Yakovets Yu.V. Russia 2050: Strategy of Innovative Break-Through. Moscow, Izdatelstvo VES MIR, 2005. 562 p. URL: http://misk.inesnet.ru/2005/03/russia-2050-strategy-of-innova-tive-break-through/ (in Russ.)

6. Guzhov V.V. Strategic directions of perfection an innovative policy in transport branch. Transport business of Russia. 2013; 3:5–8. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20173204 (in Russ.)

7. Tursunov I. Developing Innovative Entrepreneurship on The Base of The Modernization of The Economics. European Journal of Business and Economics. 2011; 3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/ejbe.v3i0.108 (in Eng.)

8. Zemskov A., Kargina L. A new world economic processes and new economic trends. Transport business of Russia. 2017; 1:27–88 (in Eng.)

9. Podhalyuzina V., Dreytsen M. Scientific and methodological provisions for assessing competition in the motor transport market. Transport business of Russia. 2017; 1:57–58 (in Russ.)

10. Kapitsyn V.M., Gerasimenko O.A., Andronova L.N. Analysis of the status and trends of applications of advanced manufacturing technologies in Russia. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2017; 28(1):67–74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S107570071701004X (in Russ.)

11. Bottazzi L., Peri G. Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data. European Economic Review. 2003; 47(4):687–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(02)00307-0 (in Eng.)

12. Crescenzi R., Jaax A. Innovation in Russia: The territorial dimension. Economic Geography. 2016; 93(1):66–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1208532 (in Eng.)

13. Aganbegian A. G. New Model of Economic Growth of Russia. Administrative Consulting. 2016; 1(85):31–36 (in Russ.)

14. Kvint V. Strategy for the Global Market: Theory and practical applications. Routledge NY, London, Sydney, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709314 (in Eng.)

15. Kazantsev S.V. Models for Assessing the Indicators of Protection of the Country and Its Regions. Region: Economics and Sociology. 2017; 2(94):32–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20170202 (in Russ.)

16. Konvisarova E.V., Uksumenko A.A. The problems of road network funding in the context of Russia’s national security. National Security / nota bene. 2016; 2:276–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2073-8560.2016.2.18180 (in Russ.)

17. Kireenko A.P., Ivanov I.A. Kakim byt' transportnomu nalogu: otsenka variantov reformirovaniya i otmeny. Izvestiya IGEA. 2013; 6:53–60 (in Russ.)

18. McGee J.E., Peterson M., Mueller S.L., Sequeira J.M. Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy: Refining the Measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2009; 33(4):965–988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00304.x (in Eng.)

19. Hsu Dan K., Wiklund Johan and Cotton Richard D. Success, Failure, and Entrepreneurial Reentry: An Experimental Assessment of the Veracity of Self-Efficacy and Prospect Theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2015; 41(1):19–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12166 (in Eng.)

20. Konvisarova E., Samsonova I., Vorozhbit O. The nature and problems of tax administration in the Russian federation. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015; 6(5):78–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s3p78 (in Eng.)

21. Belousov A. Dorozhnaya arifmetika [Elektronnyy resurs]. Ekspert Ural. Elektron. zhurn. 2015; 17(643):11. URL: http://expert.ru/ural/2015/17/dorozhnaya-arifmetika/ (in Russ.)

22. Vorozhbit O., Pristup N. A Methodical Approach to the Assessment of Economic and Social Situation of the Regions of the Russian Federation. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015. 6(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s3p49 (in Eng.)