Legal Guarantees of Economic Competition in the European Union Public Procurement Regulation
https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2017.8.2.215-226
Abstract
Purpose: the purpose of this publication is to assess legal guaranties of competition (free competition) between contractors in broadly perceived process of granting public procurement, which means not only entering into a contract subject to the specific legal regime, concluded by a public purchaser, or possible private purchaser subordinated to that legal regime, with a contractor (contractors) in order to satisfy its demand for certain goods or services, but also a due course of the whole process of granting public procurement, perceived as a sequence of factual and legal actions beginning with the moment of public announcement of a procurement, sending an invitation for submitting offers or sending invitation to negotiate for selection of an offer of a given contractor, up till final fulfilment of all obligations of the parties under the public procurement contract. Methods: the major research method is the dogmatic-legal method, namely an analysis of legal text of different laws. Moreover, there is a critical analysis of scholar literature. The most important in this context is to indicate mutual co-relations between competition and fair competition in area of public procurement system and to point other major principles of the public procurement process, such as non-discrimination rule, transparency, impartiality and objectiveness rule, legality rule, openness, rule of written form, primate of using tender mode (competitive mode, in another words it is a rule of extraordinary application of non-competitive modes or primate of granting public procurement in a tender mode). All of those rules constitute together components of the guarantee of genuine competition within the whole process of granting a public procurement. It must be stressed that the literature in the area of research in not really rich. This is accurate in terms of Polish literature and EU literature, too. Results. Conclusions and relevance: results of the research are such that new 2014 EU public procurement directives, viz. Directive 2014/23/ EU, Directive 2014/24/EU and Directive 2014/25/EU, are not really aimed at fostering the competition as the main goal. Nevertheless, a specific and deep analysis of regulation of mentioned directives leads to the conclusion that those directives provide for bigger and broader economic competition. This is achieved generally thanks to opening of the public procurement market for micro, small and medium enterprises (SMBs’ sector).
About the Author
E. KosińskiPoland
Professor dr hab., Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland, Faculty of Law and Administration, Public Economic Law Chair; Sw. Marcin 90, 61-809 Poznan, Poland; Visiting Professor, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, The International Graduate School of Management, Polytechnicheskaya St. 2, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 195251, Web of Science ID: D-5712-2017
References
1. Akman Pinar, The Concept of Abuse in EU Competition Law. Law and Economic Approaches, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, 2012.
2. Bishop Simon, Walker Mike, Economics of E.C. Competition Law: Concepts, Application and Measurment, London – Dublin – Hong Kong, 1999.
3. Bork Robert H., The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself, New York, 1978.
4. Bork Robert H., Ward S. Bowman, The Crisis in Antitrust, Columbia Law Review, vol. 65, no. 3, 1965.
5. Caro Leopold, Liberalizm i kapitalizm, Włocławek, 1937.
6. Clark John Maurice, Toward a Concept of Workable Competition, The American Economic Review 1940, vol. 30, no. 2.
7. Clark John Maurice, Competition as a Dynamic Process, Washington D.C., 1961.
8. Dabbah Maher M., International and Comparative Competition Law, Cambridge, 2010.
9. Drahos Michaela, Convergence of Competition Laws and Policie in the European Community. Germany, Austria and Netherlands, The Hague – London – Boston, 2001.
10. Fotis Panagiotis N., Competition Policy and firm’s damages (in:): Joseph E. Harrington Jr, Yannis Katsoulacos, Recent Advantages in the Analysis of Competition Policy and Regulation, Cheltenham, UK – Northampton, MA, USA, 2012.
11. Gormsen Liza Lovdahl, A Principled Approach to Abuse of Dominancie in European Competition Law, Cambridge, 2010.
12. Grupa Lizbońska (The Lisbon Group), Granice Konkurencji, Warszawa,1996.
13. Guziński Maciej, ed., Zamówienia publiczne jako przedmiot regulacji prawnej, Wrocław, 2012.
14. Hayek von Friedrich August, Individualism and Economic Order, The University of Chicago Press, Third Impression, Chicago, 1958.
15. Kosiński Eryk, Rodzaje i zakres sektorowych wyłączeń zastosowania ogolnych reguł ochrony konkurencji, Poznań, 2007.
16. Kosiński Eryk, Prawne gwarancje wolnej konkurencji w systemie zamówień publicznych w Polsce (in:) Marcin Smaga, Mateusz Winiarz, Dyscyplina finansów publicznych. Doktryna, orzecznictwo, praktyka, Warszawa, 2015.
17. Kozerska Ewa, Sadowski Piotr, Szymański Andrzej, ed., Wolność w ujęciu historycznym i prawnym. Wybrane zagadnienia, Toruń, 2010.
18. Motta Eduardo Pérez, Correa Heidi Claudia Sada, Competition Policy in Mexico (in:) David Lewis, ed., Building New Competition Law Regimes. Selected Essays, Cheltenham, UK – Northampton, MA, USA, 2013.
19. Noga Adam, Piąta fala konkurencji, Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych, Warszawa, 2003, no. 11.
20. Panasiuk Andrzej, System zamówień publicznych w Polsce, Warszawa, 2004.
21. Przeszło Ewa, Zasada konkurencji w ustawie – Prawo zamówień publicznych, (in:) Granice wolności gospodarczej w systemie społecznej gospodarki rynkowej. Księga jubileuszowa z okazji 40-lecia pracy naukowej prof. dr hab. Jana Grabowskiego, Katowice, 2004.
22. Słownik łacińsko-polski. Według slownika Hermana Mengego i Henryka Kopii, opracował Kazimierz Kumaniecki, Warszawa, 1986.
23. Sobczak Karol, Wolność gospodarcza a regulacje, Życie Gospodarcze, no. 29, 1997.
24. Szydło Marek, Prawna koncepcja zamówienia publicznego, Warszawa, 2014. 2
25. The Military Balance 2016. The annual assessment of global military capabilities and defence economics”, The International Institute for Strategic Studies, https://www.iiss.org/en/ publications/military%20balance/issues/the-military-balance- 2016-d6c9 (25.05.2016).
26. Wąchal Elżbieta Modzelewska, Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz, Warszawa, 2002.
27. Weishaar Stefan E., Cartels, Competition and Public Procurement, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA, 2013.
28. Wieloński Michał, Europejskie prawo zamówień publicznych jako narzędzie polityki społeczno-gospodarczej, Warszawa, 2013.
29. Zimmer Daniel, ed., The Goals of Competition Law, Cheltenham, UK – Northampton, MA, USA, 2012.
30. Eryk Kosiński, Legal guarantees of economic competition in the public procurement under international law regulations. The 1994 Government Procurement Agreement. Vestnik of Volzhsky University after V.N. Tatischev. 2016; 3:5 ff.
Review
For citations:
Kosiński E. Legal Guarantees of Economic Competition in the European Union Public Procurement Regulation. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2017;8(2(30)):215-226. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2017.8.2.215-226