TO A QUESTION ON ADVANTAGES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF VARIOUS TYPES OF EXCHANGE SIMULATORS-EXERCISE MACHINES
https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2016.7.4.103.107
Abstract
According to Walter Ron, business games are a tool of the future in the area of graduate education. They are very realistically simulating the professional activities of the administrative staff . In this connection, this article focuses on the use and improvement of the business, in particular, exchange, games.
The purpose of research - analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of diff erent types of exchange simulators – simulators. This goal has led to the need to solve the following tasks: to consider a variety of computer games and simulators exchange; assess their strengths and weaknesses; be compared on diff erent criteria used in the practice of stock simulators ("Game", "Network", "Broker" ("Teaching with ET") using virtual money, "Simulation"). The study is based on the method of comparative analysis in relation to the actual species of exchange stimulants, as well as compared to the exchange simulators with other active learning methods. The result of the study was to identify the most eff ective simulation applied to the most common problems facing them. Upon review of the article provides recommendations on improving the "exchange game", their functionality and architecture used in the training of investors – individuals. Particular attention is paid to the need to improve the educational industrial complex (CPC) "Stock Market Game", which authors use in educational activities when working with students. The paper formulated the conclusion that one of the main functional advantages is the ability to exchange simulators mining investment activities, testing of investment strategies in crisis situations without the risk of losing real funds. The economic basis for the use of stock simulators in training is the fact that they are significantly save the real capital, especially in the case of investment or operating errors trainees. In this connection, the use of stock simulators for teaching exchange business is a must, as their use has proved to be very eff ective in the main directions of modern education: business education, engineering, and medicine.
About the Authors
T. V. Nikitina
Saint Petersburg State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
21, Sadovaya st., Saint Petersburg, 191023
S. A. Motuz
Saint Petersburg State University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
21, Sadovaya st., Saint Petersburg, 191023
References
1. Daykin A.P., Bacon R.J. An epidural injection simulator. Anesthesia, Volume 1990, pp. 235–236. (In Eng.)
2. Schmidt Stephen J. Active and Cooperative Learning Using Web-Based Simulations. Journal of Economic Education, Spring 2003. (In Eng.)
3. Sands Eric C., Allison Shelton. Learning by Doing: A Simulation for Teaching How Congress Works. The Teacher, January 2010. (In Eng.)
4. Dozortsev V.M. Development of Computer-based Training Simulator for Industrial Operators: Main Participants, Their Roles and Communications. Automation and remote CONTROL. 2010, vol. 71, no. 7. (In Eng.)
5. Richard C. Ortioff, Training Approaclies for Using Simulators to Teacin Process Control Systems., Control engineering, December 2010. (In Eng.)
6. The AG School Implements HR Training Simulators., Major Boyce L. Edwards Jr. Army Sustainment, November–December 2011. (In Eng.)
7. Pilot Evaluation Study of a Virtual Paracentesis Simulator for Skill Training and Assessment: The Beneficial Effect of Haptic Display , Costas S. Tzafestas, Kostas Birbas, Yiannis Koumpouros, Dimitris Christopoulos. Presence, vol. 17, no. 2, April 2008. (In Eng.)
8. Effect of practice on standardized learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education. William C. Mc. Gaghie, S. Barry Issenberg, Emil R. Petrusa, Ross J. Scalese Medical Education 40, 2006. (In Eng.)
9. Recovery Training in Simulator Improves Performance and Psychophysiological State of Pilots During Simulated and Real Visual Flight Rules Flight. Ioana Koglbauer, K. Wolfgang Kallus, Reinhard Braunstingl, Wolfram Boucsein. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2010, 21(4). (In Eng.)
10. Mental Workload in Aircraft and Simulator During Basic Civil Aviation Training. Nicklas Dahlstrom, Staffan Nahlinder. The international journal of aviation psychology, 2009, 19(4), 309–325. (In Eng.)
11. Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Parachute Training Simulator: Assessing Learning in an Off-Course Augmented Feedback Training Schedule. Marcus A. Butavicius, Armando Vozzo, George Galanis. The international journal of aviation psychology, 2012, 22(3). (In Eng.)
12. Stress training and simulator complexity: why sometimes more is less. Tichon Jennifer G., Wallis Guy M., Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 29, no. 5, September–October 2010. (In Eng.)
13. Fix testing at Bear Sterns goes beyond the Message. John Sandman., Securities Industry News January 26, 2004. (In Eng.)
14. The Foreign Exchange Market Simulator. Steve Coronel, John Gosek, Jean – Pierre Varin, Montreal: Zero Base Software, Inc.,1989. (In Eng.)
15. Simulation of real exchange trading. K.V. Vorontsov IMMOD, 2003. (In Eng.)
Review
For citations:
Nikitina T.V., Motuz S.A. TO A QUESTION ON ADVANTAGES AND SHORTCOMINGS OF VARIOUS TYPES OF EXCHANGE SIMULATORS-EXERCISE MACHINES. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2016;7(4(28)):103-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2016.7.4.103.107
Views:
1006
Email this article 