THE PROCESS OF TRANSPLANTATION OF INSTITUTIONS AS THE FORMATION OF A NEW ECONOMIC SYSTEM

In the article the problems of "transplant" for post-socialist countries. Institutional framework of the transformation of society has its own characteristics. Its institutions can ensure the eff ectiveness of economic development, as a rule, in the short run. After performing their tasks, these institutions are transformed or disposed of as such, it has already completed its mission.

Purposes / tasks. The aim of this paper is to transplant institutions.

Article tasks: to explore and identify: The term "transplantation"; Factors that cause an ineffi cient choice of institutions; The main tasks of institutional transformation in market transformation of the economy.

Methodology. The methodological basis of the study is the dialectical method of scientifi c knowledge, a systematic and institutional approach to the study of transplantation of institutions as the formation of a new economic system.

Results. The result of the successful application of the transplanted institutions must be economic and social security, the formation of eff ective collective decision-making mechanisms, the growth of state budget revenues and other socio-economic indicators. The institutions should be assessed as a specifi c kind of public goods. Their characteristic is a public good is important to consider the probability of positive and negative impacts that are measured in terms of various social strata, as well as determine the eff ectiveness of the existence of diff erent variants of the institutions adopted to regulate certain processes.

Conclusions / importance. From the point of view of the determination of the economic security of its external and internal factors and risks, the main tasks of institutional transformation in market transformation of the economy are: the creation of favorable conditions for the implementation of tasks in the context of globalization and integration; maximum realization of competitive advantages of national priorities, economic security; overcoming corruption and shadow economy; formation of an eff ective competitive environment; the creation of modern legal and institutional mechanisms for the protection of intellectual property rights; innovation; reaching an agreement between the regional elites on the priorities and perspectives of regional and national development, the formation of public confi dence in the institutions of the state, government, business and civil society.

1. Veblen T. The Theory of the Leisure Class [Translated from English Sorokin]. Moscow: Progress, 1984. pp. 6. (In Eng.)

2. Coase R.H. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, no. 3, pp. 1–44. (In Eng.)

3. North D.C. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W.W. Norton, 1981. pp. 33. (In Eng.)

4. North D. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1991, no. 1, pp. 97–112. (In Eng.)

5. Williamson O.E. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stocks, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 2000, no. 3, pp. 595–613. (In Eng.)

6. Abalkin L.I. economic security of Russia: threats and their reflection. Questions of economy, 1994, no. 12, pp. 4–12. (In Eng.)

7. Arkhipov A., Gorodetsky A., Mikhailov B. Economic security: assessment of problems, methods of providing. Questions of economy, 1994, no. 12, pp. 36–44. (In Eng.)

8. Gorodetsky A. Security issues Russia. The Economist, 1995, no. 10, pp. 41–49. (In Eng.)

9. Oleynik A. N. Institutional Economics: Textbook. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2002. 290 p. (In Eng.)

10. Frib M. How to understand post-communism. K.: Political Thought, 1997. pp. 27. (In Ukrain.)

11. Polterovich V. Transplantation of Economic Institutions. Economic science of modern Russia, 2001, no. 3, pp. 45–50. (In Russ.)

12. Fleychuk M.I. Legalization of the economy and combating corruption in the system of economic security: the theoretical foundations and strategic priorities in the context of globalization. Lviv: Achilles, 2008. 660 p. pp. 8. (In Ukrain.)

13. Pivtorak A.I. The establishment of democratic institutions and the peculiarities of their functioning in terms of reforming transitional societies thesis candidate of political sciences: 23.00.02 / Alexander Ivanovich Pivtorak. Odessa National Academy of Law. Odessa, 2005. pp. 8. (In Ukrain.)

14. Burkaltseva D.D. Institutional economic security Ukraine [monograph]. K: Knowledge of Ukraine, 2012. 347 p. (In Ukrain.)

15. The economic security of Ukraine: problems and priorities in strengthening [monograph] / Z.S.Varnaliy, D.D. Burkaltseva, A.S. Saenko. K.: Knowledge of Ukraine, 2011. 299 p. (In Ukrain.)

16. Lyasnikov N.V., Dudin M.N., Lyasnikov Y. V., Economics and sociology of labor. M. KNORUS 2012. (In Russ.)

17. Dudin M.N., Lyasnikov N.V. Some methodological aspects of modeling of innovative transformation of social and economic systems. MIR (Modernizacija. Innovacii. Razvitie) = M.I.R. (Modernization. Innovation. Research), 2013, no. 15, pp. 59-63. (In Russ.)