EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS ASPECTS TO ENHANCE INNOVATION ACTIVITY OF LOGISTIC OPERATORS ECONOMIC ENTITIES
https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2016.7.2.117.124
Abstract
This article aims to consideration of exogenous aspects that affect the innovation activity of logistic operators and determine the main directions of innovation in the logistics market. The presentation materials on the subject of the article allows to generate the following key findings obtained in the course of the work: the global logistics market is actively developed and is currently undergoing a phase of high-quality update that is associated with a change in the role of logistics operators in the provision of services to its customers (the transition from the hierarchical form of interaction to an affiliate); with the organizational and economic point of view, the global logistics market is formed by two key segments (b-2-b business-to-business and b-2-c business-to-customer), within which operate three key types of logistics operators; Innovation in the field of logistics is considered as a key factor in the creation of high value-added logistics services, and as a basis for the formation of these high-value services to customers; a set of innovations designed to improve the value-added logistics services and their value to the customer, must be considered both in terms of the organization managing the logistics fl ow and in terms of the physical organization of the movement of material values of goods in space.
About the Authors
Sergey Oganovich Kalendzhyan
The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration, (119571, Moscow, Vernadskogo av., 82), Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mihail N. Dudin
The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration, (119571, Moscow, Vernadskogo av., 82), Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolaj V. Lyasnikov
The Russian Presidential Academy Of National Economy And Public Administration, (119571, Moscow, Vernadskogo av., 82), Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Yeow J., Edler J. Innovation procurement as Projects // The Journal of Public Procurement. 2012. 12(4). pp. 472–504.
2. Бутрин А.Г., Морозова Л.Ш. Моделирование цепей поставок на промышленном предприятии // Экономика, управление и инвестиции. 2014. № 1 (3). С. 5.
3. Дыбская В.В., Зайцев Е.И., Сергеев В.И., Стерлигова А.Н. Логистика: полный курс МВА. М.: Эксмо, 2008. 940 с.
4. Гарнов А., Киреева Н. Стратегическое планирование и управление как основа увеличения многозвенными логистическими цепями стоимости бизнеса // Логистика. 2012. № 1. С. 20–23.
5. Bowersox D.J., Closs D.J., Helferish O.K. Logistical Management. McMillan Publishing. 1991. 3rd ed.
6. Панарина Д.В. Повышение эффективности управления товарными запасами коммерческого предприятия // Экономика и предпринимательство. 2016. № 1-1 (66-1). С. 1003–1007.
7. Schmitta A.J., Sunb S.A., Snyderc L.V., Shenb Zuo-Jun M. Centralization versus decentralization: Risk pooling, risk diversification, and supply chain disruptions // Omega. April 2015. Vol. 52, P. 201–212.
8. Андреев А.В. Основные тенденции формирования логистики снабжения и запасов в деятельности зарубежных компаний // Транспортное дело России. 2011. № 4. С. 115–117.
9. Apostol A.R. Pre-commercial procurement in support of innovation: regulatory effectiveness? // Public Procurement Law Review. 2012. 21(6). pp. 213–225.
10. Akintoye А., McIntosh G., Fitzgerald E. A survey of supply chain collaboration and management in the UK construction industry // European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management. December 2000. Vol. 6, Issues 3–4, P. 159–168.
11. Guana J.C., Yam Richard C.M., Mok C.K., Maa N. A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models // European Journal of Operational Research. 2006 (May). Vol. 170. Issue 3. P. 971–986.
12. Clark T., Osterwalder A., Pigneur Y. Business Model You: A One-Page Method For Reinventing Your Career Paperback. ohn Wiley and Sons, 2012. 264 p.
13. Bei J. Theory and Methodology of Measuring Enterprise Competitiveness // China Industrial Economy. 2003. № 03.
14. Conner K. R. A historical comparison of the resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? // Journal of Management. 1991. № 17(1). Р.121–154.
15. Gunasekarana A., Patel C., McGaughey R.E. A framework for supply chain performance measurement // International Journal of Production Economics. February 2004. Vol. 87, Iss. 3, 18, P. 333–347
16. Essig M., Arnold U. Electronic Procurement in Supply Chain Management: An Information Economics-Based Analysis of Electronic Markets // Journal of Supply Chain Management, September 2001.Vol. 37. Iss. 3. P. 43–49.
17. Junga H., Chen F.Frank, Jeong B. Decentralized supply chain planning framework for third party logistics partnership // Computers & Industrial Engineering. September 2008. Vol. 55, Issue 2, P. 348–364.
18. Hoek R.I. van. Measuring the unmeasurable – measuring and improving performance in the supply chain // Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 1998. Vol. 3. Iss. 4, P. 187–192.
19. Lin J-S, Ou Jerry J.R. A study on supply chain value-added logistics based // International Journal of Electronic Business Management. 2011. Vol.9, № 1, pp. 58–69.
20. Songa D-W., Parola F. Strategizing port logistics management and operations for value creation in global supply chains // International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications. 2015. Vol. 18, Iss 3.
Review
For citations:
Kalendzhyan S.O., Dudin M.N., Lyasnikov N.V. EFFECT OF EXOGENOUS ASPECTS TO ENHANCE INNOVATION ACTIVITY OF LOGISTIC OPERATORS ECONOMIC ENTITIES. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2016;7(2(26)):117-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2016.7.2.117.124
Views:
850
Email this article 