Preview

MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)

Advanced search

Identify the degree of socio-psychological self-assessment team

Abstract

The article deals with theoretical aspects of the work and organizational psychology, organizational climate survey and analysis of the employees of the State Fire squad № 211 public institutions "Fire and rescue center". The purpose of this article – definition of psychological climate in the organization. To determine the psychological climate squad used a technique A. Nemov at identifying the degree of integration "SPSK" – social and psychological self-assessment team. This methodology is designed to study the level of social and psychological development of the team, which is a basic and necessary prerequisite for the formation of an optimal social and psychological climate. In April 2015 a survey was conducted, which was attended by 30 people (26% of the total population of employees in the unit at the position of "fire"). Random sampling. The methodology included 75 statements describing the behavior of the individual and collective relations (70 claims of workers and 5 – control). Working statement distributed on seven blocks of 10 claims in each band respectively characteristics such as responsibility, teamwork, unity, contact (personal relationships), openness (in relation to newcomers and representatives of other groups), organization and knowledge. The article presents the results of the analysis, which have been formulated conclusions and guidelines.

About the Authors

V. Avdeev
Moscow State Psychological and Pedagogical University
Russian Federation


A. Lebedev
Moscow State Psychological and Pedagogical University
Russian Federation


References

1. Немов Р.С. Психодиагностика. Введение в научное психологическое исследование с элементами математики: учебник для студентов высших педагогических учебных заведений, 4-е изд. М.: Владос, 2008. 631с.

2. Adams, J.S. & Rosenbaum, W.B. The relationship of worker productivity to cognitive dissonance about wage inequities // Journal of Applied Psychology, 1962, 46, 161–4.

3. Baltes, B.B. Psychological climate in the work-setting // In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes (Eds), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 18. New York: Elsevier/ Pergamon, 2001, pp. 12355–9.

4. Frieling, E./Sonntag, Kh. Lehrbuch Arbeitspsychologie // Bern: Hans Huber. 1999

5. Ivancevich, Konopaske, and Matteson. Organizational Behavior & Management, 8th Ed.

6. Lewin, K. Principles of topological psychology // New York: Johnson. 1936.

7. Parker, C.F., Baltes, B.B., Young, S., Huff, J., Altmann, R., Lacost, H. & Roberts, J.E. Relationships between climate perceptions and work outcomes: A meta-analytic review // Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2003, 24, 389–416.


Review

For citations:


Avdeev V., Lebedev A. Identify the degree of socio-psychological self-assessment team. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2015;6(4-2):391-393. (In Russ.)

Views: 1678


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-4665 (Print)
ISSN 2411-796X (Online)