Application of the methodology for selecting and implementing priorities of “smart” regional specialization: The case of the Tambov region

Purpose: to test the applicability of the methodology for selecting “smart” regional specialization proposed by the authors by identifying, with its help, promising areas of such specialization in the Tambov region within the field of FoodTech.

Methods: alongside general scientific methods of cognition, including analysis and synthesis, abstraction, comparison, and generalization, the study employs a systems approach, as well as methods of content analysis, bibliometrics, and network analysis. Expert interviews and strategic sessions were also conducted. The core research method, which is simultaneously undergoing empirical validation, is the authors’ matrix “Existing Capacities – Potential Impact” (on the region’s sustainable development).

Results: the authors propose a model for selecting priorities of “smart” specialization in the Tambov region, based on the identification of the region’s dominant competencies in the field of FoodTech. Particular attention is paid to assessing FoodTech market niches where the Tambov region is capable of demonstrating sustainable competitive advantages. The study develops a governance framework that ensures coordinated decision-making among public authorities, universities, research centers, and businesses.

Conclusions and Relevance: the application of the authors’ methodology for selecting “smart” specialization to identify and substantiate the development prospects of the Tambov region has demonstrated that the region possesses the potential to form a regional FoodTech hub based on agricultural, biotechnological, and digital competencies. The proposed method makes it possible to identify priority niches of territorial specialization, form a necessary project portfolio, and create a foundation for a systemic approach to managing the region’s innovative development and building an appropriate governance model. This enhances regional innovativeness, increases competitiveness, and contributes to ensuring national food security and technological sovereignty.

1. Wood A., Queiroz C., Deutsch L., González-Mon B., Jonell M., Pereira L., Sinare H., Svedin U., Wassénius E. Reframing the local–global food systems debate through a resilience lens. Nature Food. 2023; 4:22–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00662-0 (In Eng.)

2. Janin P., Nzossie E.-J., Racaud S. Governance challenges for sustainable food systems: the return of politics and territories. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2023; 65:101382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101382 (In Eng.)

3. Sparling T.M., Offner C., Deeney M., Denton P., Bash K., Jue R., Moore S., Kadiyala S. Intersections of climate change with food systems, nutrition, and health: An overview and evidence map. Advances on Nutrition. 2024; 15(9):100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100274 (In Eng.)

4. Finger R. Digital innovations for sustainable and resilient agricultural systems. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 2023: 50(4):1277–1309. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbad021 (In Eng.)

5. Laasonen V. Building dynamic capabilities in the transition toward a knowledge-based bioeconomy: A case study of three Finnish regions. Regional Studies. 2024; 58(6):1308–1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2249499 (In Eng.)

6. Wepner B., Neuberger S., Hörlesberger M., Moli E.M., Lampert J., Koch H. How can digitalisation support transformation towards sustainable agri-food systems? Scenario development in Lower Austria. Agricultural Systems. 2025; 224:104251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104251 (In Eng.)

7. Foray D., Eichler M., Keller M. Smart specialization strategies – insights gained from a unique European policy experiment on innovation and industrial policy design. Review of Evolutionary Political Economy. 2021; 2:83–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-020-00026-z (In Eng.)

8. Silva P., Pires S.M., Teles F., Polido A., Rodrigues C. Pre-conditions and barriers for territorial innovation through smart specialization strategies: The case of the lagging Centro region of Portugal. Urban Research and Practice. 2024; 17(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2022.2103447 (In Eng.)

9. Pylak K., Deegan J., Broekel T. Smart specialisation or smart following? A study of policy mimicry in priority domain selection. Regional Studies. 2025; 59(1):2429626. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2024.2429626 (In Eng.)

10. Schumpeter J.A. The Theory of economic development. In: The Entrepreneur: classic texts by Joseph A. Schumpeter. Ed. by Knudsen T., Becker M., Swedberg R. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2011. P. 43–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503627369-004 (In Eng.)

11. Lundvall B.-A. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers, 1992. 342 p. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109029308629360 (In Eng.)

12. Etzkowitz H. The Triple Helix: University–industry–government innovation in action. New York and London: Routledge, 2008. 176 p. URL: https://mguntur.id/files/ebook/ebook_1605608206_cf742d707b4e0bf22bf3.pdf (accessed: 03.04.2026) (In Eng.)

13. Cooke Ph., Uranga M.G., Etxebarria G. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy. 1997; 26(4-5):475–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5 (In Eng.)

14. Cooke Ph. The virtues of variety in regional innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2016; 2(3):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-016-0036-x (In Eng.)

15. Alam A., Ghatak A., Bhowmick B. Success components of university entrepreneurial ecosystem: A multimethod exploration. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2023; 71:6406–6419. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3247970 (In Eng.)

16. Ancona A., Ceci G. Fostering regional entrepreneurial ecosystem development: the role of science and technology park networks. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-025-10308-5 (In Eng.)

17. Audretsch D.B., Belitski M., Guerrero M. Sustainable orientation management and institutional quality: Looking into European entrepreneurial innovation ecosystems. Technovation. 2023; 124:102742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102742 (In Eng.)

18. Brown R., Mawson S., Rocha A. Places are not like people: The perils of anthropomorphism within entrepreneurial ecosystems research. Regional Studies. 2023; 57(2):384–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2135698 (In Eng.)

19. Krishnan R.T., Krishna V.V. Introduction: Start-ups and innovation ecosystems. Science Technology and Society. 2024; 29(1):7–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218241226499 (In Eng.)

20. Corvello V., Cimino A., Felicetti A.M. Building start-up acceleration capability: A dynamic capability framework for collaboration with start-ups. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2023; 9(3):100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100104 (In Eng.)

21. Cozzolino A., Geiger S. Ecosystem disruption and regulatory positioning: Entry strategies of digital health startup orchestrators and complementors. Research Policy. 2024; 53(2):104913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104913 (In Eng.)

22. Ferreira J.J.M., Grigoroudis E., Carayannis E.G., Dooley L. The role of entrepreneurial ecosystems in technological and social challenges. R&D Management. 2023; 53(4):563–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12634 (In Eng.)

23. Filho P.C.S., Siluk J.C.M., de Freitas Micheli C., Rigo P.D., Neuenfeldt Júnior A.L., Rosa C.B., da Silva W.V. A measurement tool for the competitiveness of startups’ innovation ecosystem. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2024; 15:8262–8289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01170-7 (In Eng.)

24. Trippl M., Zukauskaite E., Healy A. Shaping smart specialization: The role of place-specific factors in advanced, intermediate and less-developed European regions. Regional Studies. 2020; 54(10):1328–1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1582763 (In Eng.)

25. Kutsenko E., Islankina E., Kindras A. Can One Be Smart Alone? Exploring Innovation Strategies of Russian Regions in the Context of Smart Specialization. Foresight and STI governance. 2018; 12(1):25–45. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ytpmip. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2018.1.25.45 (In Russ.)

26. Gamidullaeva L.A., Vornovskaia A.A. An approach to determining “smart specialization” of regions using big data technology. π-Economy. 2024; 17(2):67–85. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/pfywft. https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.17204 (In Russ.)

27. Adamov E.V. Analysis of the structure of agricultural producers in the Tambov region. Economics of agriculture of Russia. 2023; (5):69–74. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/zkoibs. https://doi.org/10.32651/235-69 (In Russ.)

28. Kogteva A.N., Gerasimova N.A., Kulik A.M., Lyshchikova Iu.V. Prospects for the "smart specialization" of the agro-industrial complex Central Chernozem macroregion. Economics of agriculture of Russia. 2025; (1):24–30. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/gbzxgq. https://doi.org/10.32651/251-24 (In Russ.)

29. Sagina O.A., Kuzmina A.О. The current state of the agricultural-industrial complex in the Russian Federation. Vestnik NGIEI. 2024; (9(160)):80–91. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/esdutp. https://doi.org/10.24412/2227/9407-2024-9-80-91 (In Russ.)