Strategic potential of a destination: Assessments for the Russian Far Eastr
https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2025.16.4.660-677
Abstract
Purpose: based on the authors’ methodology for assessing the strategic potential of a destination, to determine the priority types of tourism and recreational activities in the regions of the Russian Far East.
Methods: the study is based on the theory of strategy, which assumes a consistency of values and interests of all participants in the strategy development process and compliance with the hierarchy of strategy. The information background for identifying the values and interests of all actors in the tourism market in the region was provided by regulatory and legal documents of a strategic level coordinating the tourism complex of the Far Eastern Federal District. The Federal Tourism Interregional Scheme of Territorial and Spatial Planning of the Russian Federation was used to combine the priority types of tourism and recreational activities outlined in regional strategic documents into consolidated types. The strategic potential of a destination was assessed using the index method with a wide range of indicators.
Results: based on the analysis of domestic and foreign theoretical approaches to the concept of "tourist and recreational potential" of a territory and methods for its assessment, the authors introduced the concept of "strategic potential of a destination" and proposed a methodology for assessing it. The methodology has been tested on the materials of the Far Eastern Federal District based on the data of 2023. The obtained assessments of the strategic potential of the destination by types of tourism and recreational activities make it possible to substantiate the strategic directions of tourism development in the subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District and to identify the discrepancy between the declared goals and the available resources and competitive advantages of the regions. The authors propose recommendations for adjusting the promising tourism specializations of the regions outlined in the industry program documents.
Conclusions and Relevance: the assessment results obtained by the authors' methodology showed the insufficiency of economic incentives and financial resources to transforming the competitive advantages of the territory into strategic priorities for tourism development. It is advisable to concentrate resources on those subjects of the macroregion that have the maximum number of competitive advantages for developing the tourism complex. The assessment of the strategic potential of the destination made it possible to single out Primorsky, Kamchatka and Khabarovsk Krai, Sakhalin Oblast, and the Republic of Buryatia as such perspective ones.
Keywords
About the Authors
L. I. VlasyukRussian Federation
Lyudmila I. Vlasyuk, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Economic and Financial Strategy Department, Moscow School of Economics
Scopus ID: 55646727700
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there is no Conflict of Interest.
I. Z. Chkhotua
Russian Federation
Ilona Z. Chkhotua, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of Economic and Financial Strategy Department, Moscow School of Economics
Moscow
Competing Interests:
The authors declare that there is no Conflict of Interest.
References
1. Romanova G.M., Onishchenko E.V. Domestic tourindustry in the system of sustainable development of tourist and recreation regions of Russia: problems and contradictions in the conditions of digitalization. NaturalHumanitarian Studies. 2022; (39(1)):275–290. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/nxxscv. https://doi.org/10.24412/2309-4788-2022-1-39-275-290 (In Russ.)
2. Davyborets E.N., Radikov I.V. Prospects for the tourism development in the Russian Far East. Transbaikal State University Journal. 2023; 29(2):205–211. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/qrkpjw. https://doi.org/10.2109/2227-9245-2023-29-2-205-211 (In Russ.)
3. Kruzhalin V.I., Menshikova T.N., Kruzhalin K.V. Strategic planning as a basis for sustainable tourism development and the preservation of cultural heritage in the regions of the Russian Federation. Geographical bulletin. 2022; (1(60)):136–149. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/mmxgll. https://doi.org/10.17072/2079-7877-2022-1-136-149 (In Russ.)
4. Sun Zh., Liu L., Pan R., Wang Y., Zhang B. Tourism and economic growth: the role of institutional quality. International Review of Economics and Finance. 2025; 98:103913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103913 (In Eng.)
5. Ivanova Yu.O., Andreev N.V., Pozdnyakov K.K. The impact of the tourism and hospitality industry on economic growth: model design. Journal of economics, entrepreneurship and law. 2021; 11(12):2979–2992. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/tzwkky. https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.11.12.114054 (In Russ.)
6. Brida J.G., Cortes Jimenez I., Pulina M. Has the tourism led growth hypothesis been validated? A literature review. Current Issues in Tourism. 2016; 19(5):394–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2013.868414 (In Eng.)
7. Cárdenas-García P.Ju., Brida Ju.G., Segarra V. Modeling the link between tourism and economic development: evidence from homogeneous panels of countries. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2024; 11(1):308. https://elibrary.ru/cdtkrf. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02826-8 (In Eng.)
8. Demyanenko A.N. Cross-border regions of the Far East: general and specific. Ojkumena. Regional Researches. 2024; (4(71)):26–37. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xkmzwz. https://doi.org/10.29039/1998-6785/2024-4/26-37 (In Russ.)
9. Minakir P.A. "Open Model" of development of the Far East. Regionalistics. 2024; 11(6):130–135. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/flcuxm. http://doi.org/10.14530/reg.2024.6.130 (In Russ.)
10. Izotov D.A. Impact of integration and geopolitical factors on trade of the Russian Far East. Spatial Economics. 2024; 20(2):40–70. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/akcore. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2024.2.040-070 (In Russ.)
11. Aganbegyan A.G. Development of the Far East: a national program in the context of national projects. Spatial Economics. 2019; 15(3):165–181. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/hlqfdq. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.3.165-187 (In Russ.)
12. Boniface B., Cooper R., Cooper Ch. Worldwide destinations: the geography of travel and tourism. New York: Routledge, 2021. 818 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003406853 (In Eng.)
13. Sarancha M.A. Tourist potential of a territory: the problematics of defining the essence and the structure. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Biology. Earth Sciences. 2015; 25(1):134–140. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/tncwdf (In Russ.)
14. Safaryan A.A. Approaches to the estimation of the tourism potential of the territory. Geographical Bulletin. 2015; (1(32)):89–102. https://elibrary.ru/tsgtst (In Russ.)
15. Konyshev E.A., Safarian A.A. The evaluation of development efficiency for the tourism and recreation complex in the regions of Russia with DEA method. Geographical bulletin. 2023; (4(67)):147–159. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/fvwqoe. https://doi.org/10.17072/2079-7877-2023-4-147-159 (In Eng.)
16. Tsoi M.E., Shchekoldin V.Yu., Ushakova E.O. Sustainable development of tourism in the region: approaches to assessing the tourist potential of territories. In: Current Eurasia. St. Petersburg: University at the IPA EurAsEC, 2023. Vol. 1. P. 223–277. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/exkyxh (In Russ.)
17. Al Mamun A., Mitra S. A methodology for assessing tourism potential: case study Murshidabad District, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2012; 9(2). URL: https://www.ijsrp. org/research-paper-0912/ijsrp-p0982.pdf (accessed: 25.12.2024) (In Eng.)
18. Yan L., Gao B.W., Zhang M. A mathematical model for tourism potential assessment. Tourism Management. 2017; 63:355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.07.003 (In Eng.)
19. Kvint V.L., Bodrunov S.D. Strategizing societal transformation. Knowledge, technologies, and noonomy: monograph. Palm Bay, Burlington, Abingdon: Apple Academic Press, 2023. 228 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/abcyyj (In Eng.)
20. Kvint V.L. Strategy for the global market: theory and practical applications. New York: Routledge, 2015. 548 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xvevor. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709314 (In Eng.)
21. Phelps E. The golden rule of accumulation: a fable for growthmen. The American Economic Review. 1961; 4(51):638–643. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1812790 (accessed: 09.09.2024) (In Eng.)
22. Porter M.E. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press, 1990. 855 p. URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01000529228 (accessed: 09.09.2024) (In Eng.)
23. Gamidullaeva L., Vasin S., Tolstykh T., Zinchenko S. Approach to regional tourism potential assessment in view of cross-sectoral ecosystem development. Sustainability. 2022; 14(22):15476. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/kfrwnz. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215476 (In Eng.)
24. Mamraeva D.G., Tashenova L.V. Methodological tools for assessing the region’s tourist and recreation potential. Economy of regions. 2020; 16(1):127–140. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/wjtkru. https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-1-10 (In Russ.)
25. Isaev A.G. Transport Infrastructure and economic growth: spatial effects. Spatial Economics. 2015; (3):57– 73. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/vchkaj. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2015.3.057-073 (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Vlasyuk L.I., Chkhotua I.Z. Strategic potential of a destination: Assessments for the Russian Far Eastr. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2025;16(4):660-677. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2025.16.4.660-677










































