Global competitiveness of Russian regions: assessment research method in the face of strategic challenges

   Purpose: the study aims to present the author's method for assessing the global competitiveness of Russian regions, focusing on key criteria such as industrial specialization, transport infrastructure, and export potential.

   Methods: the article employs ranking methods, as well as calculations of specialization indices, the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, export intensity, economic openness, and the Uspensky coefficient.

   Results: the definition of the global competitiveness of the region is proposed. The method has been developed and tested that includes ranking and three-dimensional typology of regions according to the level of global competitiveness according to the complex criterion "production specialization – transport security - realization of export opportunities" and takes into account the shortage of statistical data after 2022. "Distortions" in the development of regions have been identified and directions for adapting strategies to strengthen competitiveness have been proposed.

   Conclusions and Relevance: the global competitiveness of regions is determined by three key factors: industrial specialization, transport infrastructure, and export potential realization. The most successful regions are those with diversified industries and developed infrastructure. The typology highlights significant disparities: only 25 % of Russian regions fully utilize their export potential, while 34 % have weak infrastructure, limiting their global competitiveness. Sanctions in 2022–2023 did not drastically alter Russia’s export structure but exacerbated data scarcity and geopolitical risks, particularly for western regions. Long-term global competitiveness requires investments in infrastructure, innovation, and production diversification. The proposed research method, featuring a two-stage analysis with specialized indices and coefficients, made it possible to overcome data limitations and update strategic planning.

1. Kvint V.L. The concept of strategizing. Monograph. Kemerovo: Kemerovo State University, 2022. 170 p. EDN: buzjfs. doi: 10.21603/978-5-8353-2562-7 (In Russ.)

2. Camagni R., Capello R. Regional competitiveness and territorial capital: a conceptual approach and empirical evidence from the European Union. Regional Studies. 2013; 47(9):1383–1402. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.681640 (In Eng.)

3. Nizamutdinov M., Penchuk A., Akhmetzyanova M. Approach to typologization of territories by the level of investment potential using methods of cluster analysis (on the example of the constituent entities of the Far Eastern macroregion). In: E3S Web of Conferences. XXVII International Scientific Conference on Advance in Civil Engineering “Construction the Formation of Living Environment” (FORM-2024). 2024; 533:04025. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202453304025 (In Eng.)

4. Suvorova A. Methodological aspect of the regions resource-based typology. In: Competitiveness and the Development of Socio-Economic Systems. Proceedings of the IV International Scientific Conference, dedicated to the memory of A. Tatarkin. Series: European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Chelyabinsk, 25-26.11.2020. Chelyabinsk: European Publisher, 2020. Vol. 105. P. 321–303. EDN: gmkklv. doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2021.04.35 (In Russ.)

5. Ukrainsky V.N. The regional competitiveness: methodological reflections. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018; (6):117–132. EDN: urbjxo. doi: 10.32609/0042-8736-2018-6-117-132 (In Russ.)

6. Wu C., Zhang N., Xu L. Travelers on the railway: an economic growth model of the effects of railway transportation infrastructure on consumption and sustainable economic growth. Sustainability. 2021; 13(12):6863. doi: 10.3390/su13126863 (In Eng.)

7. Aiginger K., Firgo M. Regional competitiveness under new perspectives. In: WWWforEurope Policy Paper. 2015. Iss. 26. 56 p. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2685585 (In Eng.)

8. Komasi H., Zolfani S.H., Nemati A. Evaluation of the social-cultural competitiveness of cities based on sustainable development approach. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering. 2023; 6(1):583–602. doi: 10.31181/dmame06012023k (In Eng.)

9. Kuznetsova O.V., Druzhinin A.G. On a spatial development strategy for Russia. Problems of Forecasting. 2024; (4(205)):36–45. EDN: vvxhsp. doi: 10.47711/0868-6351-205-36-45 (In Russ.)

10. Granberg A., Artobolevskaya S., Kovaleva G., Rossel E., Artobolevskiy S. Restructuring of old industrial regions: experience of Russia and the world. Regional Development and Cooperation. 1998; (1-2):4–23. EDN: tmkcht (In Russ.)

11. Golovikhin S.A. Competitiveness rating of Russia’s regions. Fundamental Research. 2013; (11(6)):1207–1211. EDN: ruddwj (In Russ.)

12. Porter ME. Competition in global industries. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 1986. 602 р. URL: https://archive.org/details/competitioninglo00terp/mode/2up (accessed: 12. 02. 2025) (In Eng.)

13. Golovikhin S.A. New concept of basic properties of competitiveness and the regional competitiveness ranking. Society and Power. 2013; (2(40)):74–80. EDN: qaeqet (In Russ.)

14. Golovikhin S.A., Nezhivenko E.A., Nezhivenko G.V. Competitiveness of the region in the global economy. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2019; (9(431)):57–64. etgmqq. doi: 10.24411/1994-2796-2019-10906 (In Russ.)

15. Kordalska A.K., Olczyk M. Global competitiveness and economic growth: a one-way or two-way relationship? Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy. 2016; 11(1):121–142. doi: 10.12775/EQUIL.2016.006 (In Eng.)

16. Polyakova A.G., Kuznetsov D.I. Russian regions typification according to the competitiveness level. Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series Economics and Management. 2012; (4):69–79. EDN: pdtrqj (In Russ.)

17. Lavrikova N.I., Doroshenko Yu.А., Tretyakova L.A. Theoretical and methodological aspects of substantiating the essence and methods of measuring regional competitiveness. Management Accounting. 2023; (9):317–324. EDN: vnendd. doi: 10.25806/uu92023317-324 (In Russ.)

18. Pechatkin V.V. Competitive sustainability of Russian regions: trends, problems and ways of solution. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2019; 9(4):803–820. EDN: qvqemy. doi: 10.18334/epp.9.4.41372 (In Russ.)

19. Abashkin V.L., Artemov S.V., Islankina E.A., Kutsenko E.S., Rudnik P.B. Strakhova A.V., Khafizov R.R. Cluster policy: reaching global competitiveness. Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2017. 324 p. EDN: zcabxx (In Russ.)

20. Chistyakova N.O., Antonova I.S., Tatarnikova V.V., Popova S.N. Differentiation of municipalities and the influence of flagship enterprises on the level of their socio-economic development. Vestnik Universiteta. 2020; (11):105–113. EDN: lxxiag. doi: 10.26425/1816-4277-2020-11-105-113 (In Russ.)

21. Abramyan G.A. Analysis of the Russian regions competitiveness if the context of the struggle for investment. Journal of International Economic Affairs. 2020; 10(3):879–898. EDN: pglcyv. doi: 10.18334/eo.10.3.110548 (In Russ.)

22. Kostrova A.A. Increasing competitiveness as a factor in economic development of regions. Bulletin Tver State University. Series: Economics and Management. 2019; (2):266–275. EDN: abeaom (In Russ.)

23. Audretsch D.B., Belitski M. Towards an entrepreneurial ecosystem typology for regional economic development: the role of creative class and entrepreneurship. Regional Studies. 2021; 55(4):735–756. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2020.1854711 (In Eng.)

24. Hu X., Wu Q., Xu W., Li Y. Specialty towns in China: towards a typological policy approach. Land Use Policy. 2022; 114:105933. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105933 (In Eng.)

25. Zhou Y., Shen Y., Yang X., Wang Z., Xu L. Where to revitalize, and how? A rural typology zoning for China. Land. 2021; 10(12):1336. doi: 10.3390/land10121336 (In Eng.)