Stages of managing the structural transformation of regional entities based on the mechanism of public-private partnership

Purpose: of the presented article is to formulate the main stages of solving the key tasks of managing the structural transformation of production and economic systems based on the specifics of modern conditions and trends in their changes.

Methods: within the framework of this study, the set of methods was used: factual, causal, structural analysis, generalization, comparison, logical method.

Results: based on the analysis of the specifics of modern environmental conditions, changes in the subjects of industrial and economic activity and the system of their interactions, three key tasks of managing their structural transformation were formulated. The proposed stages of the implementation of the structural transformation management process at the present stage, priority for each of these management tasks, are described. The implementation of the identified tasks in the conditions of the described specifics is proposed to be carried out on the basis of the mechanism of innovative public-private partnership.

Conclusions and Relevance: analysis of the specifics of modern industrial and economic entities, their communication systems and relationships, as well as trends in their changes has shown an increased need for targeted coordinated innovative development of domestic industrial production due to the sanctions restrictions. At the same time, the impossibility of expediting these structural transformations is justified without mobilizing the efforts of all participants in the regional production and economic system. The coordinating and guiding role of government agencies as active participants in these changes is highlighted. To ensure the implementation of innovation processes localized within the country, it is proposed to rely on the mechanism of innovative public-private partnership. Relying on the results of the intellectual activity of such a mechanism will contribute to the alignment of the system participants. This requires a transition from the one-time operational practice of creating innovative solutions to the organization of their creation, implementation and diffusion as a single cyclical flow.

1. Bulygina O.V., Kulyasov N.S., Yartsev D.D. Directions for modifying the artificial bee colony algorithm to optimize control parameters for complex systems. Journal of Applied Informatics. 2024; 19(1(109)):28–37. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/rnqogo. https://doi.org/10.37791/2687-0649-2024-19-1-28-37 (In Eng.)

2. Wang F., Stoianova O.V. Modeling the effect of e-service quality and knowledge culture on employee performance: a SEM approach based on survey data from Chinese real estate industry. Journal of Applied Informatics. 2023; 18(5(107)):5–19. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/yitknc. https://doi.org/10.37791/2687-0649-2023-18-5-5-19 (In Eng.)

3. Dli M.I., Zaenchkovski A.E., Kakatunova T.V. Prerequisites for the controlling using for industrial clusters management. Economic systems management: electronic scientific journal. 2019; (10(128)):14. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/urbnci (In Russ.)

4. Dli M.I., Kakatunova T.V. Three-level fuzzy cognitive model for analyzing the processes of innovative development of the region. Journal of Applied Informatics. 2013; (1(43)):5–10. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/pwciyd (In Russ.)

5. Zaenchkovsky A.E. Foundations of integration processes logistics in innovation-oriented structures. Scientific Review. 2012; (6):614–618. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/puaoaf (In Russ.)

6. Golova I.M. Coordination of regional innovation processes to ensure the technological competitiveness of Russia. Economy of Region. 2024; 20(1):63–75. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/urkvst. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-1-5 (In Russ.)

7. Kivimaa P. Transforming innovation policy in the context of global security. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 2022; 43:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.03.005

8. Shokirov R.S., Sangin I. Theoretical aspects of production placement in the regional economy. Bulletin of TSULBP. Series of Social Sciences. 2022; (1(90)):86–97. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/fpqikc. https://doi.org/10.24412/2411-1945-2022-1-86-97 (In Russ.)

9. Zaenchkovsky A.E. The possibilities of applying innovative territorial cluster initiatives for the development of the regions of the north. The North and the market: forming the economic order. 2017; (4(55)):80–90. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/qvuejb (In Russ.)

10. Kuzminov Ya.I., Simachev Yu.V., Kuzyk M.G., etc. Import substitution in the Russian economy: yesterday and tomorrow. Analytical report of the Higher School of Economics. Moscow: HSE, 2023. 272 p. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/gyjgxe . https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-2755-9(In Russ.)

11. Buklemishev O.V. “Structural transformation” of the Russian economy and economic policy. Problems of forecasting. 2023; (4(199)):42–53. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/tlaitd. https://doi.org/10.47711/0868-6351-199-42-53 (In Russ.)

12. Tyukavkin N.M., Anisimova V.Yu. Socio-technological types and models of implementation of import substitution policy by states and regions. Vestnik of Samara University. Economics and Management. 2023; 14(3):145–157. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/eksrrd. https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-0461-2023-14-3-145-157 (In Russ.)

13. Alexandrova A.V., Tsareva E.G. The role of intangible assets in creating the value of companies in an intellectual economy. In: Intellectual property as a basic condition for ensuring the technological sovereignty of the Russian Federation. Collection of reports on the results of the XXVI international scientific and practical conference of Rospatent. Moscow: Federal Institute of Industrial Property, 2022. P. 11–13. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/hxhjxa (In Russ.)

14. Shinkevich M.V. Approaches to assessing the economic efficiency of innovation clusters in industry. Bulletin of the Kazan Technological University. 2005; (1):85–89. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/huylkh (In Russ.)

15. Yang W., Wang X. The impact of patent protection on technological innovation: A global value chain division of labor perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2004; 203:123370. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/luccti. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123370 (In Eng.)

16. Shuysky V.P. Import of foreign technologies as a means of accelerating the transition to an innovative development path. Foreign Economic Bulletin. 2005; (9):32–40. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/jwhlxf (In Russ.)

17. Smorodinskaya N.V., Katukov D.D. Russia under sanctions: limits of adaptation. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2022; (6):52–67. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/ujycyg. https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2022_6_52_67 (In Russ.)

18. Teng Yu., Zheng J., Li Y., Wu D. Optimizing digital transformation paths for industrial clusters: Insights from a simulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2024; 200:123170. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/sghktg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123170 (In Eng.)

19. Kochetova O.O. Technological development of industry based on integration of science, business and state. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2024; 21(2(134)):55–64. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/tefihr. https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2024-2-55-64 (In Russ.)

20. Annesi N., Battaglia M., Sganzetta L. Mutual benefits of sustainability integration in the value chain: Responsible innovation by public utilities. Utilities Policy. 2023; 82:101564. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/hjtawi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101564 (In Eng.)

21. Qin Sh., Kong H., Zhao J.Zh. Spatial diffusion of public-private partnership (PPP) in China: A county-level analysis. Cities. 2024; 147:104817. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/jlexfj. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104817 (In Eng.)

22. Tahi S., Khlif W., Belghoul Kh., Casadella V. Public-private innovation networks in services: Revisiting PPPs with servitization. Technovation. 2022; 118:102336. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/moxcpu. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102336 (In Eng.)

23. Niazmandi M.M., Sedaeesoula R., Lari S., Moussavi P. An integrated risk and productivity assessment model for public–private partnership projects using fuzzy inference system. Decision Analytics Journal. 2024; 10:100376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100376 (In Eng.)

24. Andreeva E.S., Dyrdonova A.N., Fomin N.Yu. Tools of state-private partnership developing the infrastructure of the Russian regions (by the example of Tatarstan Republic). Actual Problems of Economics and Law. 2018; 12(3):453– 467. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/xyyyap. https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.12.2018.3.453-467 (In Russ.)

25. Kopanska A., Osinski R., Korbus B. Private entities motivations to participate in public-private partnerships. SocioEconomic Planning Sciences. 2024; 92:101841. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/ajzslm. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101841 (In Eng.)

26. Scupola A., Mergel I. Co-production in digital transformation of public administration and public value creation: The case of Denmark. Government Information Quarterly. 2022; 39(1):101650. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/ihdaki. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101650 (In Eng.)