Partnership of key stakeholders in the use of generative artificial intelligence

Purpose: is to substantiate the need to improve the partnership between the state, business, universities and civil society in the field of generative artificial intelligence.

Methods: the research is based on the application of theoretical and empirical analysis methods, including: logical, retrospective, generalization, modeling, comparison, statistical, observation, data visualization.

Results: the article provides arguments confirming the relevance of generative artificial intelligence by its key stakeholders. The necessity of developing models of institutional interactions for building the new format of stakeholder interaction based on the principle of partial intersection of their institutional spheres of influence, coupled with the urgent demands of civil society, is substantiated. The analysis of the reasons for the interest of the state and business in using solutions based on artificial intelligence in their activities is carried out. Special attention is paid to the attitude of universities to the responsible introduction of generative artificial intelligence into the scientific and educational environment and its use in the solving educational and professional tasks. The improved model of partnership between the state, business, universities and civil society in the field of generative artificial intelligence is proposed.

Conclusions and Relevance: partnership in the field of scientific and technological progress allows us to take into account the interests and needs of its key stakeholders, as well as emerging opportunities for them to develop a new role status in the development and use of generative artificial intelligence. The recommended partnership model of key stakeholders allows for the aggregation of financial and production resources of business, competencies and scientific potential of universities in joint projects to develop solutions in the field of development and use of generative artificial intelligence, which can give a significant synergistic effect if this collaboration is complemented by state participation. Inclusion in the model of civil society will ensure that its requests for the preservation of universal values are combined in decisions on the use of generative artificial intelligence and will give a human-centered character to scientific and technological progress in the context of digitalization of society.

1. Gomez C., Unberath M., Huang C.-M. Mitigating knowledge imbalance in AI-advised decisionmaking through collaborative user involvement. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2023; 172:102977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102977 (In Eng.)

2. Sok S., Heng K. ChatGPT for education and research: a review of benefits and risks. Cambodian Journal of Educational Research. 2023; 3(1):110–121. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/vjlzuf. https://doi.org/10.62037/cjer.2023.03.01.06 (In Eng.)

3. Melekh N.V., Averyanov A.O., Gurtov V.A. Comparative analysis of the topics of scientific publications in the field of artificial intelligence in international and Russian journals. Economics and Management. 2023; 29(9):1128–1140. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ieisxi. https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2023-9-1128-1140 (In Russ.)

4. Lukichyov P.M., Chekmarev O.P. Artificial intelligence in higher education. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 2023; 13(1):485–502. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/qbtlxd. https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.13.1.117223 (In Russ.)

5. Konstantinova L.V., Vorozhikhin V.V., Petrov A.M., Titova E.S., Shtykhno D.A. Generative artificial intelligence in education: discussions and forecasts. Open Education. 2023; 27(2):36–48. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/vpmizk. https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2023-2-36-48 (In Russ.)

6. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The triple helix – university-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review. 1995; 14(1):14–19. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2480085 (In Eng.)

7. Litvinenko I.L. State support for innovation: Russian and foreign experience. International Research Journal. 2013; (8-3(15)):40–41. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/rbpprj (In Russ.)

8. Smorodinskaya N.V. The global paradigm shift and the emanation of a network economy. Journal of Economic Sociology. 2012; 13(4):95–115. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/pfarwf. https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2012-4-95-115 (In Russ.)

9. Terpugov A.E. Business incubators as a prerequisite of entrepreneurship development it universities. Bulletin of the Moscow city pedagogical University. Series: Economics. 2021; (2(28)):41–50. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/qgotmf. https://doi.org/10.25688/2312-6647.2021.28.2.3 (In Russ.)

10. Kashtanova Ye.V., Lobacheva A.S. Modern trends in the field of corporate personnel training. Management of the personnel and intellectual resources in Russia. 2022; 11(2):50–56. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/hgtkyj. https://doi.org/10.12737/2305-7807-2022-11-2-50-56 (In Russ.)

11. Lavrinenko Ya.B., Tinyakova V.I., Shishkina L.A. An empirical study of research grant support in Russian universities. Russian Journal of Innovative Economics. 2023; 13(1):471–484. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/gpgpkc. https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.13.1.117296 (In Russ.)

12. Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F.J. «Mode 3» and «Quadruple Helix»: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International journal of technology management. 2009; 46(3-4):201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374 (In Eng.)

13. Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F.J. Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: A proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD). 2010; 1(1):41–69. http://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105 (In Eng.)

14. Loskutova M.A. Artificial intelligence in higher education – breakthrough or degradation. Scientific Journal Economic Sciences. 2024; (3(232)):242–247. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/reveht. https://doi.org/10.14451/1.232.242 (In Russ.)

15. Filimonova I.V. The ethical side of using artificial intelligence in education. The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2024; 16(S1):64. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/bkkvxo (In Russ.)

16. Crompton H., Song D. The potential of artificial intelligence in higher education. Revista Virtual Universidad Católica Del Norte. 2021; 62:1–4. https://doi.org/10.35575/rvuen.n62a1 (In Eng.)

17. Kulagina N.A., Chepikova E.M. Grafov Yu.G., Goncharov A.Yu. The idea of digital business transformation: models, changes and new challenges. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economy. Sociology. Management. 2023; 13(6):44–53. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/okgshn. https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2023-13-6-44-53 (In Russ.)

18. Bamburov V.A. The application of artificial intelligence technology in corporate governance. Public Administration. 2018; 20(3(113)):23–28. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xuapbb. https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2018-20-3-23-28 (In Russ.)

19. Young M.M., Bullock J.B., Lecy J.D. Artificial discretion as a tool of governance: a framework for understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on public administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance. 2019; 2(4):301–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz014 (In Eng.)

20. Katanandov S.L., Kovalev A.A. Technological development of modern states: artificial intelligence in public administration. State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2023; (1):174–182. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/nastdx. https://doi.org/10.22394/2079-1690-2023-1-1-174-182 (In Russ.)

21. Enholm I., Papagiannidis E., Mikalef P., Krogstie J. Artificial intelligence and business value: a literature review. Information Systems Frontiers. 2021; 24:1709–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10186-w (In Eng.)

22. Deng J., Lin Y. The benefits and challenges of ChatGPT: an overview. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems. 2023; 2(2):81–83. https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis.v2i2.4465 (In Eng.)

23. Malyshev I.O. Overview of modern generative neural networks: domestic and foreign practice. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2024; (1-2(88)):168–171. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/yvclic. https://doi.org/10.24412/2500-1000-2024-1-2-168-171 (In Russ.)

24. Nam B.H., Bai Q. ChatGPT and its ethical implications for STEM research and higher education: a media discourse analysis. International Journal of STEM Education. 2023; 10:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00452-5 (In Eng.)

25. Zawacki-Richter O., Marín V.I., Bond M., Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019; 16:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239–019–0171–0 (In Eng.)

26. Haenlein M., Kaplan A. A brief history of artificial intelligence: on the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California management review. 2019; 61(4):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925 (In Eng.)

27. Dignum V. The role and challenges of education for responsible AI. London Review of Education. 2021; 19(1):1– 11. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.19.1.01 (In Eng.)