Landscape of scientific research on the problems of decarbonization and achieving carbon neutrality of national economies

Purpose: is to form a comprehensive understanding of the patterns of publication activity in the field of decarbonization that have developed in the global and Russian scientific space, in order to identify promising scientific areas on this basis that can define new research horizons in achieving carbon neutrality.
Methods: the research methods involved bibliographic and bibliometric analyses of scholarly publications, utilizing data from the Scopus and eLibrary databases. The study encompasses the timeframe from 2012 to 2022. The research methodology is structured to address three key objectives. Firstly, it aims to identify the quantitative dynamics of global publication activity in the realm of decarbonization. Secondly, the investigation seeks to analyze publication patterns at the levels of research organizations, countries, keywords, related topics, scientific publications, subject areas, and thematic groups, including clusters of thematic groups. Thirdly, the research involves semantic analysis of publications and the identification of points of research interest within the contexts of both global and Russian scientific landscapes.
Results: it has been established that bibliographic clustering of studies on decarbonization problems occurs not so much around technical and technological solutions, but in conceptually broader coordinates. It has been identified that the aspiration for carbon neutrality is predominantly observed in economies characterized by a high standard of living, where citizens exhibit a heightened sense of social responsibility and a greater commitment to enhancing the quality of life for future generations. It was revealed that if the global problems of decarbonization are the center of gravity of the most powerful researchers and scientific teams, but in Russia this topic is not yet characterized by a comparable positioning.
Conclusions and Relevance: systematization of decarbonization research, which is rapidly developing both in terms of volume indicators and in terms of increasing its interdisciplinarity and social relevance, is the most important condition for effective scientific orientation and research routing in a highly fragmented and contradictory development space on the problems of the global energy transition.

1. Bernstein S., Hofman M. The Politics of decarbonization: A framework and method. SSRN, 2015. 52 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2619322 (In Eng.)

2. Ahman M., Nilson J.L., Johansson B. Global climate policy and deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries. Climate Policy. 2017; 17(5):634–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1167009 (In Eng.)

3. Dernback J.C., Gerrard M.B. Federal Legislative and Administrative Framework. In: Sachs J. America's Zero Action Carbon Plan, Sustainable Development Solutions Network. New York, 2020. P. 105–121. URL: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2758 (accessed: 10.10.2023) (In Eng.)

4. Szulecki K. European energy governance and decarbonization policy: learning from the 2020 strategy. Climate Policy. 2016; 16(5):543–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1181599 (In Eng.)

5. Gheuens J. Putting on the brakes: the shortsightedness of EU car decarbonization policies. Climate Action. 2023; 2:3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-023-00038-5 (In Eng.)

6. Tikka K. Esau S. Securing Global Alignment in Regulations Related to Decarbonization. In: Maritime Decarbonization. Eds. Lind M., Lehmacher W., Ward R. Springer, Cham: 2023 P. 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39936-7_15 (In Eng.)

7. Dong J., Zeng J., Yang Y., Wang H. A review of law and policy on decarbonization of shipping. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2022; 9:1076352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1076352 (In Eng.)

8. Cavangh R. Energy efficiency and decarbonization: Priorities for regulated utilities. The Electricity Journal. 2021; 34(2):106908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2020.106908 (In Eng.)

9. Beccarello M., Di Foggia G. Review and perspectives of key decarbonization drivers to 2030. Energies. 2023; 16(3):1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031345 (In Eng.)

10. Li K., Tan X., Yan Y., Jiang D., Qi S. Directing energy transition toward decarbonization: The China story. Energy. 2022; 261(A):124934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124934 (In Eng.)

11. Sovacool B.K., Geels F.W., Iskandarova M. Industrial clusters for deep decarbonization. Science. 2022; 378(6620):601–604. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.add0402 (In Eng.)

12. Gerbaulet C., von Hirschhausen C., Kemfer C., Lorenz C., Oei P.-Y. European electricity sector decarbonization under different levels of foresight. Renewable energy. 2019; 141:983–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.099 (In Eng.)

13. Hamid I., Alam M.S., Kanwal A., Jena P.K., Murshed M., Alam R. Decarbonization pathways: the roles of foreign direct investments, governance, democracy, economic growth, and renewable energy transition. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022; 29:49816–49831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18935-3 (In Eng.)

14. Hamid I., Alam M.S., Murshed M., Jena P.K., Sha N., Alam M.N. The roles of foreign direct investments, economic growth, and capital investments in decarbonizing the economy of Oman. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022; 29:22122–22138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17246-3 (In Eng.)

15. Echeverri L. Investing for rapid decarbonization in cities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2018; 30:42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.010. (In Eng.)

16. Bataille C., Waisman H., Colombier M., Segafredo L., Williams J., Jotzo F. The need for national deep decarbonization pathways for effective climate policy. Climate Policy. 2016; 16(1):S7–S26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1173005 (In Eng.)

17. Vogele S., Josyabhatla V.T., Ball C., Rhoden I., Grajewski M., Rübbelke D., Kuckshinrichs W. Robust assessment of energy scenarios from stakeholders' perspectives. Energy. 2023; 282:128326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128326 (In Eng.)

18. Rosenbloom D., Rinscheid A. Deliberate decline: An emerging frontier for the study and practice of decarbonization. WIREs Climate Change. 2020; 11(6):e669. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.669 (In Eng.)

19. Wimbadi R.W., Djalante R. From decarbonization to low carbon development and transition: A systematic literature review of the conceptualization of moving toward net-zero carbon dioxide emission (1995–2019). Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020; 256:120307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120307 (In Eng.)

20. Papadis E., Tsatsaronis G. Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector. Energy. 2020; 205:118025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118025 (In Eng.)

21. Plazas-Niño F.A., Ortiz-Pimiento N.R., Montes-Páez E.G. National energy system optimization modelling for decarbonization pathways analysis: A systematic literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2022; 162:112406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112406 (In Eng.)

22. Mallouppas G., Yfantis E.A. Decarbonization in shipping industry: A review of research, technology development, and innovation proposals. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2021; 9(4):415. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9040415 (In Eng.)

23. Zier M., Stenzel P., Kotzur L., Stolten D. A review of decarbonization options for the glass industry. Energy Conversion and Management: X. 2021; 10:100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2021.100083 (In Eng.)

24. Lipu H., Ansari S, Miah S., Hasan K., Meraj S.T., Faisal M., Jamal T., Ali S.H.M., Hussain A., Muttaqi K., Hannan M.A. A review of controllers and optimizations based scheduling operation for battery energy storage system towards decarbonization in microgrid: Challenges and future directions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 360:132188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132188 (In Eng.)

25. Stampatori D., Raimondi P., Noussan M. Li-Ion batteries: A review of a key technology for transport decarbonization. Energies. 2020; 13(10):2638. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102638 (In Eng.)

26. Jiang L., Xue D., Wei Z., Chen Z., Mirzayev M., Chen Y., Chen S. Coal decarbonization: A state-of-the-art review of enhanced hydrogen production in underground coal gasification. Energy Reviews. 2022; 1(1):100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enrev.2022.100004 (In Eng.)

27. Maehara Y., Kuku A., Osabe Y. Macro analysis of decarbonization-related patent technologies by patent domainspecific BERT. World Patent Information. 2022; 69:102112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2022.102112. (In Eng.)

28. Hayashi D. Harnessing innovation policy for industrial decarbonization: Capabilities and manufacturing in the wind and solar power sectors of China and India. Energy Research & Social Science. 2020; 70:101644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101644 (In Eng.)

29. Yang D., Lee J., Song N.C., Lee S., Kim S., Lee S., Choi S., Patent analysis on green hydrogen technology for future promising technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2023; 48(83):32241–32260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.317 (In Eng.)

30. Das N., Hossain E., Bera P., Gangopadhyay P., Cifuentes-Faura J., Aneja R., Kamal M. Decarbonization through sustainable energy technologies: Asymmetric evidence from 20 most innovative nations across the globe. Energy & Environment. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231183921 (In Eng.)