Stress testing of the development of Russian regions in the context of external economic restrictions
https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2023.14.3.398-415
EDN: bsfrhu
Abstract
Purpose: is to develop the model for stress testing of the impact of external constraints of Russian regions in the context of foreign economic constraints 2022–2023.
Methods: the research is based on the theory of economic dynamics, regional economy and spatial development, the concept of the BANI world; the methodological basis of the study is a scenario approach to the formation of the stress testing model and the algorithm for determining the expected impact based on the machine learning method – the artificial neural network.
Results: the study of scientific publications on the research topic, analysis of shock events, post-shock consequences (2006–2022) made it possible to substantiate feasibility of testing and differentiating the response of Russian regions to external constraints, applying the criteria of “shock-resistant” development, classifying economic space and identifying the territory with “shock-resistant” and “non-shockresistant”reactions. The model of regions stress testing has been developed, industrial and sectoral (67.6% importance) and spatial (32.4%) stabilization factors have been identified, areas of vulnerability to the restrictions of 2022-2023 and industrial regions with the potential for “non-shock-resistant” type of reaction have been identified.
Conclusions and Relevance: the reaction of regions to external economic shocks (the duration of the decline period and the intensity of recovery growth) is determined by the totality of the production and spatial characteristics of the regions. The results of the study are important for the development of the theory of regional economy; they can be used byfederal and regional executive authorities of the Russian Federation.
Keywords
About the Authors
I. V. DanilovaRussian Federation
Irina V. Danilova, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor; Professor of the Department of Economic Theory, Regional Economics, State and Municipal Management
Scopus ID: 55970505600
Chelyabinsk
A. V. Rezepin
Russian Federation
Aleksandr V. Rezepin, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor; Associate Professor of the Department of Economic Theory, Regional Economics, State and Municipal Management
Scopus ID 57190415900
Chelyabinsk
N. V. Pravdina
Russian Federation
Natalya V. Pravdina, Candidate of Economic Sciences; Associate Professor of the Department of Industrial Economics and Project Management
Chelyabinsk
Competing Interests:
Правдина Наталья Викторовна, кандидат экономических наук; доцент, кафедра экономики промышленности и управления проектами
Челябинск
References
1. Mariotti S. A warning from the Russian–Ukrainian war: avoiding a future that rhymes with the past. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics. 2022; 49:761–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-022-00219-z (In Eng.)
2. Menshchikova V.I., Rodionova N.K., Burmistrova A.A. Production capabilities of Russian regions under new sanctions and restrictions. Scientific notes of the Russian Academy of Entrepreneurship. 2022; 21(4):22–32. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/zpkgso. https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-6258-2022-21-4-22-32 (In Russ.)
3. Spartak A.N. Reshaping Russia's international economic cooperation amid sanctions and new challenges. Russian foreign economic journal. 2023; (4):9–35. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/bpmqhs. https://doi.org/10.24412/2072-8042-2023-4-9-35 (In Russ.)
4. Piskun E.I., Khokhlov V.V. Economic development of the Russian Federation regions: factor-cluster analysis. Economy of regions. 2019; 15(2):363–376. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/lqiobh. https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-2-5 (In Russ.)
5. Treyvish A.I. Uneven and structurally diverse spatial development of economy as a scientific problem and Russian reality. Spatial economics. 2019; 15(4):13–35. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/mbivcx. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.4.013-035 (In Russ.)
6. Khasanov A.E. VUCAand BANI-world – a new reality for Russian entrepreneurship. Moscow Economic Journal. 2023; 8(4):37. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/enuqih. https://doi.org/10.55186/2413046X_2023_8_4_152 (In Russ.)
7. Norrbin S.C., Schlagenhauf D.E. The role of international factors in the business cycle: a multi-country study. Journal of International Economics. 1996; 40(1-2):85–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(95)01385-7 (In Eng.)
8. Agwu F.A. Foreign Policy in the Age of Globalization, Polpulism and Nationalism. A New Geopolitical Landscape. Singapore: Springer Verlag, 2021. 485 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3372-0 (In Eng.)
9. Ivanov P.A. To the question of the method of the express assessment of the stability of the economy of the territories to external shocks. Economics and Business: theory and practice. 2022; (6-1(88)):172–175. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/gntgfc. https://doi.org/10.24412/2411-0450-2022-6-1-172-175 (In Russ.)
10. Smorodinskaya N.V., Katukov D.D. Resilience of economic systems in the age of globalization and sudden shocks. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk. 2021; (5):93–115. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/wsqhuz. https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2021_5_93_115 (In Russ.)
11. Pesotsky A.A. Economic shock and shock resistance (resilience): interrelation of the concepts. Theory and practice of social development. 2021; (8(162)):55–60. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xdmiwu. https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2021.8.8 (In Russ.)
12. Bogachev Yu.S. Bekulova S.R., Trifonov P.V. Problems of foreign economic activity in the conditions of increasing geopolitical acuity. Polyot. All-Russian Scientific-Technical Journal. 2022; (10):29–37. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/pgjddz (In Russ.)
13. Szirmai A., Verspagen B. Manufacturing and economic growth in developing countries, 1950–2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2015; 34:46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2015.06.002 (In Eng.)
14. Martin R. Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography. 2012; 12(1):1–32. https://doi.org/doi:10.1093/jeg/lbr019 (In Eng.)
15. Okunev I.Yu., Lopatina V.R. The Neighbourhood Effect in Russian Regional Policies: Autocorrelation and Cluster Analysis. RUDN Journal of Political Science. 2022; 24(4):634–650. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/gohmyy. https://doi.org/ 10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-4-634-650 (In Eng.)
16. Doroshenko Yu.A., Starikova M.S., Ryapukhina V.N. Identification of industrial and innovative development models of regional economic systems. Economy of regions. 2022; 18(1):78–91. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/umtons. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-1-6 (In Russ.)
17. Modica M., Reggiani A., Nijkamp P. Vulnerability, resilience and exposure: methodological aspects and an empirical application to shocks. 2018. URL: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:srt:wpaper:1318 (In Eng.)
18. Benz D.S. Assessment of socio-economic immunity of the Chelyabinsk region. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2021; 6(452):122–131. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/cziyii. https://doi.org/10.47475/1994-2796-2021-10614 (In Russ.)
19. Hill E., Clair T.St., Wial H., Wolman H., Atkins P., Blumenthal P., Ficenec S., Friedhoff A. Economic Shocks and Regional Economic Resilience. Building Resilient Regions Network. Institute of Governmental Studies University of California. 2011. URL: http://brr.berkeley.edu/brr_workingpapers/2011-03-hill_et_al-conference_economic_shocks_regional_economic_resilience.pdf (In Eng.)
20. Boschma R. Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies. 2015; 49(5):733– 751. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.959481 (In Eng.)
21. Izryadnova O.I., Kovaleva M.A. Dynamics and structure of production: adaptation to new realities. Russian economic developments. 2023; 30(1):14–21. EDN: https://www.elibrary.ru/lurvcj (In Russ.)
22. Pendall R., Foster K.A., Cowell M. Resilience and regions: building understanding of the metaphor. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2010; 3(1):71–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsp028 (In Eng.)
23. Georgescu O.-M., Gross M., Kapp D., Kok C. Do stress tests matter? Evidence from the 2014 and 2016 stress tests. European Central Bank Working Paper. 2017; 2054. https://doi.org/10.2866/622534 (In Eng.)
24. Lyvova M.I. Theoretical aspects of the regional finance potential stress-testing. Bulletin of the Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law. 2011; (1(14)):27–31. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/mjwqsi (In Russ.)
25. Vertakova Yu.V. Plotnikova N.A. The analysis of Russian industry and export in pandemic crises. Russian Economic Bulletin. 2021; 4(5):179–185. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ryttpg (In Russ.)
26. Maltsev A.A. Sanctions: stress test of Russian’s industrial sector (the Ural case). Russian foreign economic journal. 2022; (4):55–74. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/bjtiqg. https://doi.org/10.24412/2072-8042-2022-4-55-74 (In Russ.)
27. Hodrick R.J., Prescott E.C. Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 1997; 29(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2953682 (In Eng.)
28. Letiagina E.N., Perova V.I. Neural network modeling of regional innovation ecosystems. Journal of New Economy. 2021; 22(1):71–89. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/hvnwfq. https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2021-22-1-4 (In Russ.)
29. Losev V.S., Tolkacheva E.V. Forecast models of social and economic indicators of the region based on artificial neural networks. Bulletin of the Pacific State University. 2021; (3(62)):45–52. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xplxfw (In Russ.)
30. Polozhentseva Yu.S., Sogacheva O.V., Yaroshenko A.A. Forecasting the dynamics of the gross regional product using the neural network apparatus. Natural-Humanitarian research. 2021; (36(4)):220–224. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/igreiz. https://doi.org/10.24412/2309-4788-2021-11303 (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Danilova I.V., Rezepin A.V., Pravdina N.V. Stress testing of the development of Russian regions in the context of external economic restrictions. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2023;14(3):398-415. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2023.14.3.398-415. EDN: bsfrhu