Broad-based Employee Ownership in Great Reset of capitalism

Purpose: the authors explore the Role of Employee Ownership in the context of the Great Reset of Capitalism.
Methods: in contrast to the theory of stakeholder capitalism, this article discusses an alternative point of view on the reset of capitalism – through the Broad-based Employee Ownership of companies in the world and Russian economy. The article criticizes G. Dow's methodological approaches and the underestimation on the contribution of Labour-managed firms to the world economy. The criterion of "45 founders or more" is applied to the mass ownership of employees, with a minimum number of founders of a cooperative of 5 persons.
Results: the article presets results of two empirical studies. The first is to verify the current assessment of the head of the National Center for Worker Ownership (NCEO) on the significant role of Employee Ownership. Since neither the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) nor its analogues are implemented in Russia, the second empirical study was conducted on an array of 15,086 agricultural cooperatives representing small and medium-sized businesses in the Russian Federation.
Сonclusions and Relevance: it is concluded that the NCEO assessment was fully confirmed, and accordingly, G. Dow's assessment was refuted. The share of medium-sized enterprises-agricultural cooperatives with mass ownership of workers (45 founders or more) in the general database of enterprises-agricultural cooperatives is estimated to be an order of magnitude higher than the share of medium-sized enterprises in the total number of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). To improve the mechanism of state financial support in the long term, new directions havebeen identified: the organizational and legal the form of a small and medium-sized business entity, the ownership and Broad-based employee ownership (founders /co-owners) of companies.

1. Schwab K. The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum, 2016. URL: https://law.unimelb.edu.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0005/3385454/Schwab-The_Fourth_Industrial_Revolution_Klaus_S.pdf (In Eng.)

2. Schwab K., Vanham P. Stakeholder Capitalism: A Global Economy that Works for Progress, People and Planet. Wiley; John Wiley & Sons Limited, 2021. 304 р. (In Eng.)

3. Blagov Yu.E. R. Edward Freeman and the stakeholder concept. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management. 2012; (1):109–116 (In Russ.)

4. Kleiner G.B. The reform of the system of social regulation in Russia and the priorities for the development of labor collectives of enterprises. Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. 2019; 217(3):120–136 (In Russ.)

5. Bychkov A.P. Economic relations of collective farms with the socialist state and the development of property relations: Monograph / ed. M.P. Evseev. Tomsk: Tomsk University Press, 1968. 472 p. (In Russ.)

6. Bychkov A.P. Collective-farm property and prospects for its development: Monograph / ed. M.P. Evseev. Tomsk: Tomsk University Press, 1962. 94 p. (In Russ.)

7. Zimina T. Enterprises with the property of employees: results of development. Ekonomist. 2018; (12):46–51 (In Russ.)

8. Gimpelson V.E. Age and Wage: Stylized Facts and Russian Evidence. HSE Economic Journal. 2019; 23(2):185–237. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8691-2019-23-2-185-237 (In Russ.)

9. Dow G. The Theory of the Labor-Managed Firm: Past, Present, and Future. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2018; 89(1):65–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apce.12194 (In Eng.)

10. Dow G.R. The Labor-Managed Firm: Theoretical Foundations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459423 (In Eng.)

11. Hansmann H. When Does Worker Ownership Work? ESOPs, Law Firms, Codetermination, and Economic Democracy. The Yale Law Journal. 1990; 99(8):1749 –1816. https://doi.org/10.2307/796676 (In Eng.)

12. Zhu Zh., Hoffmire J., Hoffmire J, Wang F. Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Their Effect on Productivity: The Case of Huawei. International Journal of Business and Management Invention. 2013; 2(8):17–22. URL: https://ijbmi.org/papers/Vol(2)8/Version-2/C0282017022.pdf (accessed: 04.06.2022) (In Eng.)

13. Madden G., Bloch H., Coble-Neal G. Labour and capital saving technical change in telecommunications. Applied Economics. 2002; 34(14):1821–1828. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840210126188 (In Eng.)

14. Kanarsh G.Yu. Two Models of Capitalism. The Horizons of Humanities Knowledge. 2018; (2):35–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.17805/ggz.2018.2.4 (In Russ.)

15. Young S. Moral Capitalism: Reconciling Private Interest with the Public Good. Berrett-Koehler, Inc., 2003. 341 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/moralcapitalismr0000youn/page/n7/mode/2up (In Eng.)

16. Hawken P., Lovins A., Lovins L. Natural Capitalism. Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. Washington, DC: US Green Building Council, 1999. 424 p. URL: https://archive.org/details/naturalcapitali000hawk/mode/2up (In Eng.)

17. Mackey J., Sisodia R. Conscious capitalism. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2013. 368 p. (In Eng.)

18. Ostrom E. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, 1990. 447 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763 (In Eng.)

19. Butov A.V. Home and overseas experience in developing turquoise organization. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2019; (2):153–162. https://doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2019-2-153-162 (In Russ.)

20. Malyarov O.V. Independent India: the evolution of the socio-economic model and the development of the economy: in 2 volumes. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura Publisher, 2010. 1536 p. (In Russ.)

21. Chang Ha-Jon. Economics: The User's Guide. London: Bloomsbury Press, 2014. 384 p. (In Eng.)

22. Piketty T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England, 2014. 452 p. URL: https://dowbor.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/14Thomas-Piketty.pdf (In Eng.)

23. Taranukha Yu.V. From "partial laborer" to manager: the worker's new role in production. Problems in political economy. 2019; (1):102–107 (In Russ.)

24. Grebnev L. Factors and Resources: Identity, Difference, or Opposition? Voprosy ekonomiki. 2010; (7):135–150. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2010-7-135-150. (In Russ.)

25. Khanin G. Self-management and collective property: universal drug or great illusion? Svobodnaya mysl' = Free thought. 2016; 2(1656):131–148 (In Russ.)

26. Khanin G. Self-management and collective property: universal drug or great illusion? (Ending). Svobodnaya mysl' = Free thought. 2016; 3(1657):107–126 (In Russ.)

27. Kudelina O.V., Adova I.B. Development of the Human Capital Theory in the 21st Century: Megatrends and the Russian Context. Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2020; (51):60–87. https://doi.org/10.17223/19988648/51/4 (In Russ.)

28. Gimpelson V. Does the Russian economy need human capital? Ten doubt. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2016; (10):129– 143. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-10-129-143 (In Russ.)