Improving methods for assessing economic security at the micro level in the context of digitalization
https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.3.329-342
Abstract
Purpose: the article aims at using additional functionalities of the digital economy and modern information systems to develop new analytical tools for monitoring economic security and identifying company risks.
Methods: the article uses traditional methods of scientific analysis, economic and mathematical statistics. Moreover, the author proposes the new approaches, which develop a methodology for diagnosing economic security factors at the region level and micro level using additional functional capabilities of digital economy and modern information systems.
Results: based on the analysis of existing methods for assessing economic security at the micro level, urgent methodological problems of assessing the economic security have identified. New approaches have developed for diagnosing the economic security of a company. They base on the use of search capabilities and functionality of modern information systems. The paper presents the author's methodology for assessing possible strategic advantages due to integration processes and cooperation, and it has tested on the example of the Tver region.
Conclusions and Relevance: new methods for diagnosing the qualitative characteristics of the development potential and risks of a company consider as a management tool that provides the administration of an economic entity with the opportunity to conduct diagnostics in the system: potential-risk and identify competitive advantages and the most significant risks and threats to development. Such a presentation of opportunities and threats helps to substantiate a set of targeted management decisions aimed at using competitive advantages and eliminating or neutralizing threats and risks. In this case, modern information technologies make it possible to provide an information-empirical basis for research, achieve the set goals and solve the problem of the results reliability.
Keywords
About the Author
I. V. VyakinaRussian Federation
Head of the Department of Economics and Production Management, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Assistant Professor,
22, Afanasy Nikitin embankment, Tver, 170026
References
1. Richardson L. Digital and Platform Economies. In: International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. 2020; 317–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10533-5 (In Eng.)
2. Shaikh A.A., Sharma R., Karjaluoto H. Digital innovation & enterprise in the sharing economy: An action research agenda. Digital Business. 2020; 1(1):100002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100002 (In Eng.)
3. Yuan S., Musibau H.O., Genç S.Y., Shaheen R., Ameen A., Tan Z. Digitalization of economy is the key factor behind the fourth industrial revolution: How G7 countries are overcoming with the financing issues? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021; (165):120533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120533 (In Eng.)
4. Li K., Kim D.J., Lang K.R., Kauffman R.J., Naldi M. How should we understand the digital economy in Asia? Critical assessment and research agenda. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 2020; (44):101004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101004 (In Eng.)
5. Hevner A., Gregor S. Envisioning entrepreneurship and digital innovation through a design science research lens: A matrix approach. Information & Management. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103350. (In Eng.)
6. Youssef A.B., Boubaker S., Dedaj B., Carabregu-Vokshi M. Digitalization of the economy and entrepreneurship intentions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021; (164):120043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120043 (In Eng.)
7. Škare M., Soriano D.R. A dynamic panel study on digitalization and firm's agility: What drives agility in advanced economies 2009–2018. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021; (163):120418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120418 (In Eng.)
8. Mau V.A. Economy and Politics 2019-2020: Global Challenges and National Answers. Voprosy ekonomiki = Economic Issues. 2020; (3):5-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-3-5-27 (In Russ.)
9. Chen Y. Improving market performance in the digital economy. China Economic Review. 2020; (62):101482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101482 (In Eng.)
10. Shastitko A.E., Kurdin A.A., Markova O.A., Meleshkina A.I., Morosanova A.A., Pavlova N.S., Shpakova A.A. Competition and Competition Policy: at the Crossroads of the Future and the Past. Moscow: Publishing house "Delo" RANEPA, 2019. 68 p. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3339233 (In Russ.)
11. Lopez J.J. A quantitative theory of tax evasion. Journal of Macroeconomics. 2017; (53):107–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2017.06.005 (In Eng.)
12. Grunina D.K. Control and supervision activity as a factor in increasing the business activity of tax authorities. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics. Taxes. Right. 2018; 3(11):131–139 (In Russ.)
13. Avdeeva Z.K., Kovriga S.V., Lepskiy V.E., Raikov A.N., Slavin B.B., Zatsarinny A.A. The Distributed Situational Centers System as an Instrument of State and Corporate Strategic Goal-Setting in the Digital Economy. IFACPapersOnLine. 2020; 2(53):17499–17504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2156 (In Eng.)
14. Sysoev A.P. Problems and prospects of using digital technologies in regional and municipal administration. Moscow: Science, 2019. 270 p. (In Russ.)
15. Severin V.A. Theoretical and methodological foundations of ensuring the security of commercial structures in the information sphere. Informatsionnoe pravo = Information law. 2016; (4):13–19 (In Russ.)
16. Porokhovsky A.A. Private and public interests as factors of development in the context of digitalization. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = Economic revival of Russia. 2019; 2(60):55–61 (In Russ.)
17. Watanabe C., Naveed K., Tou Y., Neittaanmäki P. Measuring GDP in the digital economy: Increasing dependence on uncaptured GDP. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2018; (137):226–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.053 (In Eng.)
18. Bendikov M.A. Economic security of an industrial enterprise in conditions of crisis development. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom = Management in Russia and abroad. 2000; (2):19–29 (In Russ.)
19. Zaporozhtseva L.A., Agibalov A.V. The concept of assessing the level of strategic economic security of an enterprise. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy = Socio-economic phenomena and processes. 2014; 9(11):78–85 (In Russ.)
20. Maslennikov V.V., Trokhov A.A. Methodological approaches to assessing the risks that determine the economic security of the company. Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: ekonomika i upravleniye = Azimuth of scientific research: economics and management. 2016; 5(4):272–274 (In Russ.)
21. Yarkina N.N., Vershinina A.N. Formation of the system of economic diagnostics of a metallurgical enterprise as a factor in ensuring its economic security. Molodoy uchenyy = Young Scientist. 2017; (11):300–306 (In Russ.)
22. Gayfullina M.M., Kostomarova Ye.V. Methodical approach to assessing the economic security of an oil company. Naukovedeniye = Science. 2017; 9(2):11 (In Russ.)
23. Govorina O.V. Development of a mechanism for assessing the economic security of an enterprise in market conditions. Vestnik KrasGAU = Bulletin of KrasGAU. 2008; (3):13–19 (In Russ.)
24. Grigor'yeva V.V., Shumeyko V.V. Methodology for assessing the level of economic security of an enterprise. European research: collection of articles. Art. XIX International Scientific and Practical Conference. Penza: MTSNS «Nauka i Prosveshcheniye», 2019. Р. 163–167 (In Russ.)
25. Yermakova I.N. Mikheyeva N.B., Khandogina D.S. Methodological approaches to assessing the level of economic security of an agricultural enterprise. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskiy i gumanitarnyy zhurnal Krasnoyarskogo GAU = Socio-economic and humanitarian journal of the Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University. 2018; (4):43–54 (In Russ.)
26. Mokrousova K.V. Identification and assessment of investment risks as tasks of the system of ensuring the economic security of an industrial enterprise. Ekonomika. Innovatsii. Upravleniye kachestvom. = Economics. Innovation. Quality control. 2017; (4):4–9 (In Russ.)
27. Ovechkina O.N. Concept and methodology for assessing the financial security of an enterprise. Voprosy ekonomiki i prava = Problems of Economics and Law. 2013; (3):87–92 (In Russ.)
28. Podmolodina I.M., Voronin V.P., Konovalova Ye.M. Approaches to assessing the economic security of enterprises. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta inzhenernykh tekhnologiy = Bulletin of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2012; 4(54):156–161 (In Russ.)
29. Gil'fanov M.T. Organizational and methodological tools for assessing determinants and ensuring the economic security of an enterprise. Sotsial'noekonomicheskiye yavleniya i protsessy = Socioeconomic phenomena and processes. 2013; 8(054):19–27 (In Russ.)
30. Yashin S.N., Okhezina G.M. Some aspects of ensuring the economic security of an industrial enterprise based on an assessment of the organizational and technical level of production. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2017; 23(6):353–368 (In Russ.)
31. Marx K., Engels F. Works: in 30 volumes, 2nd ed. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1962. 25(2). 551 p. (In Russ.)
32. Luo Y.A Coopetition perspective of MNC-host government relations. Journal of International Management. 2004; 10(4):431–451. DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2004.08.004 (In Eng.)
Review
For citations:
Vyakina I.V. Improving methods for assessing economic security at the micro level in the context of digitalization. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2021;12(3):329-342. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.3.329-342