Organization of the Public Procurement System in Japan and the Possibility of Applying Experience in Russia

Purpose: is to identify the features of the organization of the Japanese public procurement system and the applicability of the positive experience for Russia. For this, it is necessary to study the organization of the public procurement system in Japan, highlighting the most effective elements and tools; to show the features of the functioning of the system and possible ways of future development; to give a comparative description of the procurement systems of Japan and Russia; to suggest ways to improve the Russian procurement system, using the experience of Japan.

Methods: during the work, general scientific and special research methods were used, including statistical analysis, processing of analytical data, analogies, scientific generalizations, etc.

Results: as a result of the analysis of changes in the legislative framework, on the basis of which public procurement in Japan is regulated, the authors examined the qualitative characteristics of the interconnections of the procurement system participants and assessed the development prospects, incl. Special attention is paid to the content and hierarchy of regulatory legal acts regulating the scope of procurement.

The important link of the author's research was the procedure for organizing procurement in the course of applying various types of procurement procedures, including open, selective and limited procurement methods. A comparative analysis of the procurement systems of Japan and the Russian Federation allowed us to determine the similarities and differences in the organization of the procurement process.

Conclusions and Relevance: as a result of the analysis the validity of the execution of the state order through the competitive procurement system used in world practice has been substantiated. This formed the basis of the targeted approach and the identification of promising directions in the development of the public procurement system in Japan until 2030. The authors highlight the areas that are successfully implemented in the field of public procurement in the Russian Federation. This indicates the positive development of the Russian system, which was created taking into account the best international experience, including Japanese practice. To improve the mechanism of interaction between participants and exchange of experience in the public procurement system, directions have been identified and the most effective tools have been identified.

1. Orusova O.V. Modern model of the Japanese economy: features of development. Self-government.2020; 9(1(118)):303-306 (In Russ.)

2. Sukhodolov Ya.A. Modern specifics of foreign trade cooperation between Russia and Japan. Baikal Research Journal. 2019; 10(3):11. DOI:10.17150/2411-6262.2019.10(3).11 (In Russ.)

3. Kuznetsova T.O., Gordeichenko L.O. Constitutional foundations of the budget process and budget policy in Japan. Law and Management. XXI Century. 2019; 15(4(53)):110-117. DOI: 10.24833/2073-8420-2019-4-53-110-117 (In Russ.)

4. Makaeva K.I., Egorinova E.S., Sangadzhieva A.S., Davaeva B. B., Shankchieva E. Ts., Bakaeva A. Z., Badminov M.B. Foreign experience in supporting and developing the regional economy. Economics and entrepreneurship. 2020; 10(123):337-340. DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2020.123.10.061 (In Russ.)

5. Ohkawaraa H., Fukushima N., Kitagawaa T., Ito T., Masutani Y., Sawa Y. Tissue Procurement System in Japan: The Role of a Tissue Bank in Medical Center for Translational Research, Osaka University Hospital. Transplantation Proceedings. 2020; 42(1):190-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.12.037 (In Eng.)

6. Raj A., Agrahari A., Srivastava S.K. Do pressures foster sustainable public procurement? An empirical investigation comparing developed and developing economies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020; (266): 122055. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122055 (In Eng.)

7. Hattori T. Determinants of the number of bidders in the competitive procurement of electricity supply contracts in the Japanese public sector. Energy Economics. 2010; (32):1299-1305. URL: http://faculty.smu.edu/Millimet/classes/eco6375/papers/hattori%202010.pdf (In Eng.)

8. Karpov K.A. Legal foundations of the financial system of Japan: Monograph. Kazan: Limited Liability Company "Buk", 2019. 140 р. (In Russ.) S. 25-29

9. Kushch L.I. World experience of legal regulation of public procurement. In: Actual problems of legal and economic knowledge: theory and practice. Donetsk: Digital Printing House, 2018. Р. 159-166 (In Russ.)

10. Birjukova O.V., Daniltsev A.V. Regulation of public procurement in international trade in services. Russian Foreign Economic Journal. 2015; 7:31-42. (In Russ.)

11. Birulin O. Optimality of Simple Procurement Auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2020; 70(2):102610. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2020.102610 (In Eng.)

12. Yashchenko E.A. Japan in the modern world economic system. Management accounting and finance. 2019; (3):208-219 (In Russ.)

13. Prokina D.E. Trends and prospects of the Japanese economy. In: Student science - look into the Future. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University, 2020. Р. 89-91(In Russ.)

14. Renzin A.M., Suslov D.V. Economic dynamics in Japan: detailing of the Abenomics policy institutional outlines. Japanese Studies in Russia. 2020; (1):85-105. DOI: 10.24411/2500-2872-2020-10005 (In Russ.)

15. Yunusov A.A., Akhverdyan A.G., Voronina V.V. Goverment and legal system of Japan. Bulletin of the public research laboratory "Interaction of the penal system with civil society institutions: Historical, legal and theoretical methodological aspects". 2019; (16.):25-29 (In Russ.)

16. Prokopchenko E.Yu. Organization of the public procurement system in Asian countries. In: Prospects for the development of science in the modern world. Neftekamsk: Scientific Publishing Center "World of Science", 2020. Р. 63-68 (In Russ.)

17. Zhigit A.A., Khamidullina K.I., Lashkin S.A. Comprehensive evaluation of electronic auction at the purchase of public services purchases (on the example of construction contract). Russian Economic Bulletin. 2020; (1):68-74 (In Russ.)

18. Danilovskaya A.V. Legal protection of competition in Japan, the Republic of Korea and the People's Republic of China: features of criminal liability. Asia-Pacific region: economics, politics, law. 2020; 22(2):107-124. DOI: 10.24866/1813-3274/2020-2/107-124 (In Russ.)

19. Weinbender T.L. Regulation of the state budget of industrially developed countries. In: Actual problems of the development of economic entities, territories and systems of regional and municipal management Kursk: Southwestern State University, 2019. Р. 78-86 (In Russ.)

20. Kandrashova S.V. Budgetary system of Japan. In: Youth andXXI century - 2019. Kursk: "University Book", 2019. Р. 208-211(In Russ.)

21. Nozdreva R.B. Panlic debt of Japan: analysis of features and assessment of prospects. Bulletin of MGIMO University. 2019; 12(5):114-133. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2019-5-68-114-133 (In Russ.)

22. Dolgikh O.S., Vakhnina T.N., Bashkatova V.Ya. Modern development of cooperative sector of economy in the countries East Asian. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2019; (5-3):46-55 (In Russ.)

23. Vorobieva N.V., Kozerod Yu.M. Japan's experience in ensuring innovative development of agriculture. Economy, labor, management in agriculture. 2020; 7(64):148-152. doi: 10.33938/207-148 (In Russ.)

24. Burduli E.A. Foreign practice of public procurement. In: ntellectual potential of the XXI century. Neftekamsk: Scientific Publishing Center "World of Science", 2020. Р. 62-65 (In Russ.)

25. Popov E.V., Semyachkov K.A., Fairuzova D.Yu. Priorities of economic policy for the development of the digital economy. National interests: priorities and security. 2019; 15(7(376)):1198-1214. DOI: 10.24891/ni.15.7.1198 (In Russ.)

26. Aitzhanova D.A., Duisen G.M., Ualtayev M.D. Digitalization of the Kazakhstan's economy on the example of state procurement of foreign countries. Statistics, accounting and audit.2019; (2(73)):77-81 (In Russ.)

27. Baybusinova Zh.D. Support of small and mediumsized agribusiness in foreign countries. Problems of the agricultural market. 2019; (3):181-186 (In Russ.)

28. Kozhemyakin A.S. Local government in Japan. Pen of science. 2019; (9(9)):7-11 (In Russ.)

29. Vayno A.A. Comparative legal analysis of the systems of executive power in Russia and Japan. Actual problems of Russian law. 2020; 15(9(118)):195-205. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2020.118.9.195-205 (In Russ.)

30. Gvozdev V.A. Foreign experience in training staff for state civil service. Bulletin of the Chuvash University. 2019; (2):29-34 (In Russ.)

31. Pokrovskaia N.V., Belov A.V. Tax Revenues of Local Budgets in Unitary States: a Case Study of Japan. Journal of Tax Reform. 2020; 6(1):73-89. doi: 10.15826/itr.2020.6.1.076 (In Russ.)

32. Keneshbekova B.K. Personnel policy in the public service of Japan. Bulletin of the Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University. 2020; 20(3):88-91 (In Russ.)

33. Zamogilnyy S.I., Stavropolskiy Yu.V. Organizational approaches to ensure the effectiveness of health promotion in Korea and Japan. In: Problems of the quality of healthimproving and health-preserving activities of educational organizations. Yekaterinburg: Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University, 2019. Р. 133-138 (In Russ.)

34. Tsyndrya V.N. Ballroot system of administrative punishments (recovery): analysis of foreign experience. Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science. 2019; 5(3):320-328 (In Russ.)