PROSPECTS FUZZY MULTIPLE DESCRIPTIONS OF INNOVATIVE RISKS
Abstract
The authors have summarized the shortcomings of traditional methods of risk assessment based on probabilistic approaches, identifi ed the advantages of fuzzy multiple descriptions. Justifi ed the transition to non-Markov paradigm research of innovative risk. The implementation of innovative strategies takes place inRussiaunder development trends of globalization, nonlinearity and nonequilibrium external and internal environment that requires a new understanding of the management of high risk and innovative insurance in ensuring the sustainability of modern enterprises. Under these conditions, the problem also updated the competitiveness of enterprises, based on their innovative activity. However, a number of researchers have noted inconsistencies in practice innovative risk management mechanisms and insurance management innovation in enterprises, as well as the lack of development of management problems high innovation risk that the objective obstacles increase innovation activity of the domestic economy and its post-industrial development.
About the Authors
S. G. ZhuravinRussian Federation
Sergey Grigorievich Zhuravin, Doctor of Economics, academic of RAEN, Professor Chair of Economics and Finance
V. N. Nemtsev
Russian Federation
Viktor Nikolaevich Nemtsev, Doctor of Economics, member correspondent of RAEN, Head of the Chair of Economics and Finance
References
1. Hurwicz L. Optimality Criteria for Decision Making under Ignorance // Cowles commission papers. 1951. № 370.
2. Vilensky P.L., Livshits V.N., Smolyak S.A. Evaluating the effectiveness of investment projects. Theory and practice. M.: Delo, 2004.
3. Grinberg R.S., Zhuravin S.G., Nemcev V.N. The new paradigm of research in terms of implementation of innovative strategies // Bulletin of the Magnitogorsk State Technical University. G.I. Nosova. 2014. № 1.
4. Gryzenkova Ju., Cyganov A. Features risk management for the enterprise innovation // Intellectual Property. Industrial property. 2005. № 8.
5. Dilts R. Modeling using fuzzy logic approach. SPb.: Publishing house «Peter», 2000.
6. Zade L. Concept of linguistic variable and its application to the adoption of approximate solutions. Trans. from English. M.: Mir, 1976. 7. Kofman A., Hil Aluha H. Introduction of fuzzy set theory in the management of enterprises / Trans. with Spanish. Minsk: Higher School, 1992
7. Kravets A.S. Nature probability. Monograph. M.: Thought, 1976.
8. Nemcev V.N. Study of the problems of risk management of innovative enterprise: Monograph. M.: Ankil, 2011.
9. Nemcev V.N. Risk management is an innovative enterprise: the modern paradigm // Problems of the theory and practice of management. 2011. № 8.
10. Rykov A.S., Titarenko A.A. Interactive algorithm to select the best solution for the statistical uncertainty // Theory of active systems / Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference. November 14–15, 2007 Moscow, Russia. Edited by V.N. Burkov, D.A. Novikov. M.: Institute of Control Sciences, 2007.
11. Sevastiyanov P.V., Sevastiyanov D.P. Valuation of financial parameters and risk investment from the standpoint of the theory of fuzzy sets // Trusted program. 1997. № 1.
12. Smolyak S.A. Account the specific investment projects in the evaluation of their effectiveness // Audit and financial analysis. 1999. № 3. S. 71–98.
13. Truhaev R.I. Model of decision making under uncertainty. M.: Nauka, 1981. 15. Cyganov A.A., Gryzenkova Ju.V. Theory and practice of insurance risks of innovation. M.: RAGS, 2005.
Review
For citations:
Zhuravin S.G., Nemtsev V.N. PROSPECTS FUZZY MULTIPLE DESCRIPTIONS OF INNOVATIVE RISKS. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2014;5(4(20)):44-51. (In Russ.)