Preview

MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)

Advanced search

Assessment of the Digital Economy Development on the Example of the European Union

https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2020.11.2.196-215

Abstract

Purpose: the study methodological approaches to assessing the level of development of the digital economy and develop recommendations for improving digitalization development management processes.

Methods: the research methodology is based on the use of elements of various types of analysis, statistical methods and macroeconomic modeling methods. The empirical base is represented by a set of thematic materials, including statistical data from European Union countries.

Results: the study presents various interpretations of the content of the concept of "digital economy", indicating its content in accordance with the evolutionary development of society and the progress of scientific and technological progress. Approaches to measuring the level of development of the digitalization of the economy on a global scale are considered. The absence of the universally recognized universal indicators and methods recognized in this field has been revealed. An analysis of the development of the digital economy in the countries of the European Union using the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) is carried out. A model has been developed that allows the grouping of EU countries taking into account the level of development of the digital economy and the characteristic features for each selected group of countries, which will increase the efficiency of managerial decisions in the direction of the development of CEs in specific conditions.

Conclusions and Relevance: the differentiation in the level of development of the countries of the European Union determines the presence of significant differences in strategic priorities in the implementation of the digitalization of the economy. The main direction of digitalization of the economy should be considered industrial production. A new production paradigm is the formation of intelligent production based on the introduction of digital production and digital information technologies in the main stages of the product life cycle. Sociocyberphysical systems capable of solving key problems, both in the digitalization of production systems and becoming the locomotives of the growth of the new economy, are being formed in this context. They have the ability to interact with both the environment and the social sphere through the creation of new jobs. The developed model is focused on taking into account the specific features of the development of a country (group of countries), allows you to identify key problems in the development of the digital economy and timely take the necessary measures to solve them.

About the Authors

N. I. Didenko
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Nikolay I. Didenko, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

29, Polytechnitcheskaya st., St. Petersburg, 195251

ResearcherID: Q-2431-2015

Scopus: 56105001600



D. F. Skripnuk
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Djamilia F. Skripnuk, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

29, Polytechnitcheskaya st., St. Petersburg, 195251

ResearcherID: A-4838-2016

Scopus: 56104974500



V. V. Kobylinsky
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Kobylinsky, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University

29, Polytechnitcheskaya st., St. Petersburg, 195251

 



References

1. Avdeeva I.L., Golovina T.A., Parakhina L.V. Development of digital technologies in economics and management: russian and foreign experience. Voprosy upravleniya = Management Issues. 2017; (6(49)): 50–56 (In Russ.)

2. Semjachkov K.A. Digital economy and its role in the management of modern socio-economic relations. Sovremennye tekhnologii upravleniya = Modern Management Technology. 2017; 8(80):8001 (In Russ.)

3. Dzhuliy L.V., Yemchuk L.V. Information systems and their role in the activities of modern business. In: Perspective economic and management issues. Collection of scientific articles. Scientific journal «Economics and finance», «East West». 2015. Р. 130–134 (In Russ.)

4. Bukht R., Heeks R. Defining, Conceptualising and Measuring the Digital Economy. International Organisations Research Journal. 2018; 13(2): 143–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2018-02-07 (In Russ.)

5. Varnavskiy V.G. Digital technologies and the growing of world economy. Drukerovskii vestnik = Drucker Herald. 2015; 3(7):73–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17213/2312-6469-2015-3-73-80 (In Russ.)

6. Brennen S., Kreiss D. Digitalization and Digitization. Culture Digitally. 2014. 8 September. URL: http://culturedigitally.org/2014/09/digitalization-and-digitization/ (accessed 05.12.2019) (In Eng.)

7. Tapscott D. The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1996. 342 р. (In Eng.)

8. Lane N. Advancing the Digital Economy into the 21st Century. Information Systems Frontiers. 1999; 1(3):317– 320 (In Eng.)

9. Kling R., Lamb R. IT and Organizational Change in Digital Economies. Understanding the Digital Economy / E. Brynjolfsson, B. Kahin (eds). Cambridge, МА: MIT Press. 2000. P. 295–324 (In Eng.)

10. Brynjolfsson E., Kahin B. Understanding the Digital Economy / E. Brynjolfsson, B. Kahin (eds). Cambridge, МА: MIT Press. 2000. P. 1–10 (In Eng.)

11. Mesenbourg T.L. Measuring the Digital Economy. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2001. URL: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/workingpapers/2001/econ/umdigital.pdf (accessed 05.12.2019) (In Eng.)

12. Dahlman C., Mealy S., Wermelinger M. Harnessing the Digital Economy for Developing Countries. Paris: OECD. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/18151949. URL: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/4adffb24-en.pdf?expires=1580053414&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=FA36B38F96D728B7AA777B9FDD5DE587 (accessed: 05.12.2019) (In Eng.)

13. Asanov R.K. The formation of the concept of "digital economy" in modern science. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki i gumanitarnye issledovaniya = Social and economic sciences and humanities. 2016; (15):143–148 (In Russ.)

14. Kutsman A.A. Transformation of the internal and external business environment in the digital economy. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal = Economic Systems Management: an electronic scientific journal. 2016; 11(93) (In Russ.)

15. Avdeeva I.L. Analysis of prospects of the development of the digital economy in Russia and abroad. In: Digital Economy and Industry 4.0: Problems and Prospects. Proceedings of a Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation. 2017. P. 19–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18720/IEP/2017.1/1 (In Russ.)

16. Tsirenshchikov V. Digitalization of the European economy. Sovremennaya Evropa = Modern Europe. 2019; (3(89)):104–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope32019104113 (In Russ.)

17. Charoen D. The Development of Digital Computers. Ijaber. 2015; 13(6):4495–4510. URL: https://serialsjournals.com/abstract/86066_4495-4510.pdf (accessed: 05.12.2019) (In Eng.)

18. Nambisan S. Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2016; 41(6):1029–1055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254. URL: https://www.effectuation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Nambisan-2016-Entrepreneurship_Theory_and_Practice-1.pdf (accessed: 05.12.2019) (In Eng.)

19. Myovella G., Karacuka M., Haucap J. Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications Policy. 2020; 44(2):101856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856 URL: https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v44y2020i2s0308596119302290.html (accessed: 05.06.2020) (In Eng.)

20. Watanabe C., Naveed K., Tou Y., Neittaanmäki P. Measuring GDP in the digital economy: Increasing dependence on uncaptured GDP. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2018; 137(С):226–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.053 (In Eng.)

21. Kraus S., Roig-Tierno N., Bouncken R.B. Digital innovation and venturing: An introduction into digitalization of entrepreneurship. Review of Management Science. 2019; 13(3):519–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00333-8. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rvmgts/v13y2019i3d10.1007_s11846-019-00333-8.html (accessed: 05.06.2020) (In Eng.)

22. Paiola M., Gebauer H. Internet of things technologies, digital servitization and business model innovation in BtoB manufacturing firms. Industrial Marketing Management. 2020; 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.03.009 (In Eng.)

23. Zheng P, Sivabalan A.S. A generic tri-model-based approach for product-level digital twin development in a smart manufacturing environment. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 2020; (64):101958 (In Eng.)

24. Chakravorti B., Tunnard С., Chaturvedi R.Sh. Where the Digital Economy Is Moving the Fastest. Harvard Business Review. February 29, 2015. URL: https://hbr.org/2015/02/where-the-digital-economy-is-movingthe-fastest (accessed:10.06.2019) (In Eng.)


Review

For citations:


Didenko N.I., Skripnuk D.F., Kobylinsky V.V. Assessment of the Digital Economy Development on the Example of the European Union. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2020;11(2):196-215. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2020.11.2.196-215

Views: 2576


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2079-4665 (Print)
ISSN 2411-796X (Online)