<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mir</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие)</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2079-4665</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2411-796X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>School of Public Administration</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18184/2079-4665.2016.7.4.71.75</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mir-690</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МОДЕРНИЗАЦИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>MODERNIZATION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>СВОБОДНЫЙ ФРАНЧАЙЗИНГ КАК АЛЬТЕРНАТИВА КЛАССИЧЕСКОМУ ФРАНЧАЙЗИНГУ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>FREEDOM FRANCHISING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE CLASSIC FRANCHISING</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Соловова</surname><given-names>Л. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Solovova</surname><given-names>L. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>экономический факультет, аспирант кафедры экономики инноваций,</p><p>119991, г. Москва, Ленинские Горы, д. 1</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Faculty of Economics, </p><p>1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">write333@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБОУ ВО Московский государственный университет имени М. В. Ломоносова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>01</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>4(28)</issue><fpage>71</fpage><lpage>75</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Соловова Л.А., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Соловова Л.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Solovova L.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.mir-nayka.com/jour/article/view/690">https://www.mir-nayka.com/jour/article/view/690</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье описывается модель свободного франчайзинга, а также проводится её сопоставление с классической моделью франчайзинга. Целями данной статьи являются систематизация и приращение знаний в области эволюции модели франчайзинга. Перед автором стояли задачи выявления основных признаков модели свободного франчайзинга, сопоставления модели свободного франчайзинга и модели классического франчайзинга, а также определения предпосылок применения модели свободного франчайзинга в бизнесе. Для достижения данных целей автором использовались методы анализа, синтеза, сопоставления, а также лонгитюдный метод. Классический франчайзинг подразумевает передачу от франчайзера франчайзи как видимых (дизайн, фирменный стиль), так и не видимых покупателю элементов (бизнес-процессов, ноу-хау). Подобная бизнес-модель способствует сохранению высоких стандартов качества продуктов или услуг, а также позволяет сети расти быстрыми темпами. К недостаткам подобной модели можно отнести сложность внедрения инноваций со стороны франчайзи – новые идеи строго отбираются франчайзером и внедряются по всей сети только после соответствующей их апробации на экспериментальных точках. Однако существует франчайзинговая модель бизнеса, при которой, во-первых, франчайзи может экспериментировать с внешними элементами системы (оформлением точки), а также в которой поощряется инициатива и новые идеи франчайзи. Она называется «свободный франчайзинг». Необходимо отметить, что ключевые элементы системы стандартизированы в обеих моделях, поскольку регламентированные процессы производства и обслуживания призваны сохранить высокий уровень качества продуктов или услуг по всей сети. Модель свободного франчайзинга не применима в отраслях, где требуется полная стандартизация бизнеса, а также в случае, если компания делает ставку на быстрый рост. При этом она помогает франчайзи, стремящимся привнести новые идеи, воплотить их по всей сети. Материалы статьи могут быть использованы франчайзерами при разработке франчайзингового предложения, так как модель свободного франчайзинга позволяет сочетать следование рамкам франчайзинговой модели и поощрение инициативы франчайзи.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article is devoted to the model of freedom franchising and to its comparison with the classic franchising model. The aim of the article is to systemize and enrich the knowledge in the sphere of the franchising model evolution. The author’s task was to identify the key features of the freedom franchising model, to compare the freedom franchising with classic franchising and to formulate the conditions under which the freedom franchising model can be developed. To achieve this the analysis, synthesis, comparison and longitude methods were used. Classic franchising model includes the transfer of both visible (design, brand style) and invisible to the customers (business processes, know-how) elements from the franchisor to the franchisee. Such a business model enables the franchise to preserve the high quality of products and services and to grow the net at high rate. The drawback of the classic model is the complexity of bringing up innovations by the franchisee – new ideas are strictly chosen by the franchisor and then implemented within the network only after the successful experience in control points of contact. Nevertheless, there is the franchising business model in which franchisees can experiment with front-of-house (visible) elements of the system (such as point’s of contact design) on the one hand, and on the other – in which new ideas and initiatives from the franchisee are welcomed by the franchisor. The model is called “freedom franchising”. It is important to point out that key system elements are standardized in both models as standardized production processes help preserve high quality within the franchising net. Freedom franchising model is not applicable in the spheres where full business standardization is needed as well as in the business that is focusing on fast growth. But it helps franchisees to implement new ideas within the whole network. The article would be of interest to franchisors for creating franchise programs as freedom franchising model helps combine the regulations of the franchising model with franchisees’ initiatives.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>франчайзинг</kwd><kwd>бренд</kwd><kwd>классическая модель франчайзинга</kwd><kwd>свободный франчайзинг</kwd><kwd>инновации</kwd><kwd>стандартизация</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>franchising</kwd><kwd>brand</kwd><kwd>classic franchising model</kwd><kwd>freedom franchising</kwd><kwd>innovations</kwd><kwd>standardization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hui-Heng Chen. An empirical study of fairness and satisfaction in franchise network: The mediate effect of relationship quality / Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hui-Heng Chen. An empirical study of fairness and satisfaction in franchise network: The mediate effect of relationship quality. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2011. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kaufmann P., Eroglu S. Standardization and adaptation in business format franchising // Journal of Business Venturing. Elsevier BV, 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaufmann P., Eroglu S. Standardization and adaptation in business format franchising. Journal of Business Venturing. Elsevier BV, 1999. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blair R., Lafontaine F. The Economics of Franchising // Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blair R., Lafontaine F. The Economics of Franchising. Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2005. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Streed O., Cliquet G. Concept Uniformity: Control Versus Freedom in Business Format Franchising. Strategy and Governance of Networks // Springer Science + Business Media, 2008, p. 205–220.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Streed O., Cliquet G. Concept Uniformity: Control Versus Freedom in Business Format Franchising. Strategy and Governance of Networks. Springer Science + Business Media, 2008, pp. 205–220. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pizanti I., Lerner M. Examining Control and Autonomy in the Franchisor-Franchisee Relationship // International Small Business Journal, 21(2). SAGE Publications, 2003, p. 131–159.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pizanti I., Lerner M. Examining Control and Autonomy in the Franchisor-Franchisee Relationship. International Small Business Journal, 2003, 21(2). SAGE Publications, 2003, pp. 131–159. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cliquet G., Nguyen M-N. Innovation Management within the Plural Form Network. Economics and Management of Franchising Networks // Springer Science + Business Media, 2004, p.109–125.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cliquet G., Nguyen M-N. Innovation Management within the Plural Form Network. Economics and Management of Franchising Networks. Springer Science + Business Media, 2004, pp.109–125. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Terry A., Di Lernia C. Quasi-Franchising: A New Model for Strategic Business Cooperation. Network Governance // Springer Science + Business Media, 2013, p. 269–286.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Terry A., Di Lernia C. Quasi-Franchising: A New Model for Strategic Business Cooperation. Network Governance. Springer Science + Business Media, 2013, pp. 269–286. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ritzer G. The “McDonalization” of Society / Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press, 1993.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ritzer G. The “McDonalization” of Society. Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press, 1993. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Klein N. No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies, 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Klein N. No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies, 1999. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pawle J., Cooper P. Measuring Emotion–Lovemarks, The Future Beyond Brands // WARC Limited, 46(1), 2006, p. 38–48.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pawle J., Cooper P. Measuring Emotion–Lovemarks, The Future Beyond Brands. WARC Limited, 2006, 46(1), pp. 38–48. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gilder G. Wealth and Poverty // ICS Press, 1993.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gilder G. Wealth and Poverty. ICS Press, 1993. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Diaz-Bernardo R. Franchising and The Society: The Case of Franchising in the Hotel Industry // Clute Institute 5(3), 2011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Diaz-Bernardo R. Franchising and The Society: The Case of Franchising in the Hotel Industry. Clute Institute, 2011, 5(3). (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hendrikse G., Windsperger J. Determinants of Contractual Completeness in Franchising. New Developments in the Theory of Networks // Springer Science + Business Media, 2010, p.13–30.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hendrikse G., Windsperger J. Determinants of Contractual Completeness in Franchising. New Developments in the Theory of Networks. Springer Science + Business Media, 2010, pp.13–30. (In Eng.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
