mirМИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие)MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)2079-46652411-796XSchool of Public Administrationmir-655Research ArticleРАЗВИТИЕRESEARCHРАЗВИТИЕ РОССИЙСКОЙ ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ВЛАСТИ В ПОСТКРИЗИСНУЮ ЭПОХУ: ТЕНДЕНЦИИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫTHE DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIAN POLITICAL POWER IN THE POST-CRISIS ERA: TRENDS AND PROSPECTSКурюкинА. Н.KuryukinA. N.

кандидат политических наук, старший научный сотрудник ИС РАН

candidate of political Sciences, senior researcher, IS RAS

ИС РАНРоссияIS RASRussian Federation20100609201013(3)104109Copyright © Курюкин А., 20162016Курюкин А.Kuryukin A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.mir-nayka.com/jour/article/view/655

В статье на широком теоретическом материале автор рассматривает тенденции и перспективы развития российской политической власти в посткризисную эпоху. В этом развитии им выделяются некоторые дихотомии, которые обусловят собой дальнейшую эволюциюотечественной властной системы, её характерные черты и признаки.

In article basing on a wide theoretical material the author considers tendencies and prospects of development of the Russian political power during a postcrisis epoch. It detects some dichotomies which will identify the further evolution of the Russian imperious system, its characteristic features and living conditions.

государствообществовластьполитическая властьтенденции развития политической властиthe statea societythe political powerthe tendencies of political power developmentReferencesHahn G.M. Russia’s revolution from Above, 1985–2000: Reform, Transition and Revolution … 2nd ed. NJ, New Brunswick, 2004.Hahn G.M. Russia’s revolution from Above, 1985–2000: Reform, Transition and Revolution … 2nd ed. NJ, New Brunswick, 2004.Gerth H. H., Wright Mills C. From Max Weber Essays in Sociology. 4th ed. Oxf. Un. Press. 1982. – Р. 224, 297–298.Gerth H. H., Wright Mills C. From Max Weber Essays in Sociology. 4th ed. Oxf. Un. Press. 1982. – Р. 224, 297–298.Lawson G. The Rise and Rise of Administrative State. Harvard Law Review. 107, 1994. – Р. 1231–1254.Lawson G. The Rise and Rise of Administrative State. Harvard Law Review. 107, 1994. – Р. 1231–1254.O’Donnell G. Delegative democracy // Journal of Democracy. – 1994. – 5 (I). – Р. 55–69.O’Donnell G. Delegative democracy // Journal of Democracy. – 1994. – 5 (I). – Р. 55–69.Pettit Ph. Republicanism. Oxf. Un. Press. 1997.Pettit Ph. Republicanism. Oxf. Un. Press. 1997.Reddaway P. The Tragedy of Russia’s Reforms: Market Bolshevism against Democracy. Washington: DC. 2001.Reddaway P. The Tragedy of Russia’s Reforms: Market Bolshevism against Democracy. Washington: DC. 2001.Rawls J. The Theory of Justice. Harvard: MA, 1971.Rawls J. The Theory of Justice. Harvard: MA, 1971.Tuck R. Grotius and Selden. In Cambridge History of Political Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge, 2001.Tuck R. Grotius and Selden. In Cambridge History of Political Thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge, 2001.Vile M. Constitutionalism and Separation of Powers. 3rd ed. Indianapolis. 2005.Vile M. Constitutionalism and Separation of Powers. 3rd ed. Indianapolis. 2005.Walder A. Communist Neo-traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. University of California Press, Berkley. 1986.Walder A. Communist Neo-traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. University of California Press, Berkley. 1986.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.