mirМИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие)MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)2079-46652411-796XSchool of Public Administrationmir-51Research ArticleМОДЕРНИЗАЦИЯMODERNIZATIONМОДЕЛЬ РАСПРЕДЕЛЕНИЯ БЮДЖЕТА ПОРТФЕЛЯ ИТ-ПРОЕКТОВ С УЧЕТОМ ИХ ПРИОРИТЕТНОСТИMODEL OF DISTRIBUTION OF THE BUDGET OF THE PORTFOLIO OF IT PROJECTS TAKING IN-TO ACCOUNT THEIR PRIORITYСотниковаА. В.SotnikovaAnita V.

Для корреспонденции: Сотникова Анита Витаутасовна, ГОУ ВПО «Московский государственный университет экономики, статистики и информатики (МЭСИ)» (119501 г. Москва, ул. Нежинская, 7), Россия, Iwanowa_anita@mail.ru

Postgraduate

Iwanowa_anita@mail.ruМосковский государственный университет экономики, статистики и информатикиРоссияMoscow State University of Economics, Statistics and InformaticsRussian Federation20151009201562(22-2)eng1722Copyright © Сотникова А.В., 20152015Сотникова А.В.Sotnikova A.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.mir-nayka.com/jour/article/view/51

Статья посвящена проблеме эффективного распределения общего бюджета портфеля между ИТ-проектами, входящими в его состав, с учетом их приоритетности. Обозначенная проблема является актуальной ввиду невысоких результатов деятельности консалтинговых компаний в сфере информационных технологий.

Для определения приоритетности ИТ-проектов используется метод аналитических сетей, разработанный Т. Саати. С целью применения данного метода разработана система критериев (показателей), отражающих влияние ИТ-проектов портфеля на наиболее значимые цели реализации ИТ-проектов портфеля. В качестве системы критериев использованы ключевые показатели эффективности, определяемые при разработке Сбалансированной системы показателей, которые удовлетворяют вышеперечисленным требованиям. Суть метода аналитических сетей заключается в попарном сравнении ключевых показателей эффективности относительно цели реализации портфеля и ИТ-проектов, входящих в состав портфеля. Результатом использования метода аналитических сетей являются коэффициенты приоритетности каждого ИТ-проекта портфеля, которые используются в предложенной модели распределения бюджета портфеля между ИТ-проектами. Таким образом, бюджет портфеля ИТ-проектов распределен между ними с учетом не только дохода от реализации каждого ИТ-проекта, но и других важных для ИТ-компании критериев, например: степень соответствия ИТ-проекта стратегическим целям ИТ-компании, определяющая целесообразность реализации ИТ-проекта; срок выполнения ИТ-проекта, определяемый заказчиком. Разработанная модель распределения бюджета портфеля между ИТ-проектами апробирована на примере распределения бюджета между ИТ-проектами портфеля, состоящего из трех ИТ-проектов. С учетом полученных коэффициентов приоритетности ИТ-проектов портфеля и предложенной модели распределения бюджета портфеля был перераспределен допустимый объем затрат на каждый ИТ-проект. Это позволило более корректно распределять выделенный для реализации портфеля бюджет, следовательно, позволило избежать необоснованных затрат при реализации ИТ-проекта портфеля. 

Article is devoted to a problem of effective distribution of the general budget of a portfolio between the IT projects which are its part taking into ac-count their priority. The designated problem is actual in view of low results of activity of the consulting companies in the sphere of information technologies.

For determination of priority of IT projects the method of analytical networks developed by T. Saati is used. For the purpose of application of this method the system of criteria (indicators) reflecting influence of IT projects of a portfolio on the most significant purposes of implementation of IT projects of a portfolio is developed. As system of criteria the key indicators of efficiency defined when developing the Balanced system of indicators which meet above-mentioned requirements are used. The essence of a method of analytical net-works consists in paired comparison of key indicators of efficiency concerning the purpose of realization of a portfolio and IT projects which are a part of a portfolio. Result of use of a method of analytical networks are coefficients of priority of each IT project of a portfolio. The received coefficients of priority of IT projects are used in the offered model of distribution of the budget of a portfolio between IT projects. Thus, the budget of a portfolio of IT projects is distributed between them taking into account not only the income from implementation of each IT project, but also other criteria, important for the IT company, for example: the degree of compliance of the IT project to strategic objectives of the IT company defining expediency of implementation of the IT project; the term of implementation of the IT project determined by the customer. The developed model of distribution of the budget of a portfolio between IT projects is approved on the example of distribution of the budget between IT projects of the portfolio consisting of three IT projects. Taking into account the received coefficients of priority of IT projects of a portfolio and the offered model of distribution of the budget of a portfolio the admissible volume of costs of each IT project was redistributed. It allowed to distribute more correctly the budget allocated for realization of a portfolio, therefore, allowed to avoid unreasonable expenses at implementation of the IT project of a portfolio. 

портфель ИТ-проектовметод аналитических сетейкоэффициент приоритетностиportfolio of IT projectsmethod of analytical networkspriority coefficientReferencesAnshin V. M. Models of management of a portfolio of projects in the conditions of uncertainty / V.M. Anshin, I.V. Demkin, I.M. Nikonov, I.N. Tsarkov. M.: MATI publishing center, 2007. 117 p.Anshin V. M. Models of management of a portfolio of projects in the conditions of uncertainty / V.M. Anshin, I.V. Demkin, I.M. Nikonov, I.N. Tsarkov. M.: MATI publishing center, 2007. 117 p.Barkalov P.S. Problems of distribution of resources in management of projects / P.S. Barkalov, I.V. Burkova, A.V. Glagolev, V.N. Kolpachev. M.: YIP RAHN, 2002. 65 p.Barkalov P.S. Problems of distribution of resources in management of projects / P.S. Barkalov, I.V. Burkova, A.V. Glagolev, V.N. Kolpachev. M.: YIP RAHN, 2002. 65 p.Burkov V.N., Dzhavakhadze G.S. Economic-mathematical models of management of development of branch production. M.: YIP RAHN, 1997. 64 p.Burkov V.N., Dzhavakhadze G.S. Economic-mathematical models of management of development of branch production. M.: YIP RAHN, 1997. 64 p.Van der Merv of Andr é. Definition of priorities within multi – Projects / Van der Merv of Andr é. Management of projects and programs, 2007, no. 3(11), pp. 250– 254.Van der Merv of Andr é. Definition of priorities within multi – Projects / Van der Merv of Andr é. Management of projects and programs, 2007, no. 3(11), pp. 250– 254.Dieng R. Critical factors of success of the project: some aspects of management of IT projects in China. Management of projects and programs, 2009, no. 1(17), pp. 6–13.Dieng R. Critical factors of success of the project: some aspects of management of IT projects in China. Management of projects and programs, 2009, no. 1(17), pp. 6–13.Kaplan Robert S., Norton Deyvid P. Balanced system of indicators. From strategy to action. 2nd prod., испр. and. additional / [the Lane from English M. Pavlova]. M.: JSC Olympe-business, 2008. 320 p.Kaplan Robert S., Norton Deyvid P. Balanced system of indicators. From strategy to action. 2nd prod., испр. and. additional / [the Lane from English M. Pavlova]. M.: JSC Olympe-business, 2008. 320 p.Kendall I., Rollinz To. Modern methods of management of portfolios of projects and office of management of projects: Maximizing ROI: The lane with English. M.: JSC PMSOFT, 2004. 576 p.Kendall I., Rollinz To. Modern methods of management of portfolios of projects and office of management of projects: Maximizing ROI: The lane with English. M.: JSC PMSOFT, 2004. 576 p.Matveev A.A. Models and methods of management of portfolios of projects / A.A. Matveev, D.A. Novikov, A.V. Tsvetkov. M.: PMSOFT, 2005. 206 p.Matveev A.A. Models and methods of management of portfolios of projects / A.A. Matveev, D.A. Novikov, A.V. Tsvetkov. M.: PMSOFT, 2005. 206 p.Saati T.L. Decision-making at dependences and feedback: Analytical networks. The lane with English / Nauch. edition A.V. Andreychikov, O.N. Andreychikova. Prod. the 4th. M.: LENAND, 2015. 360 p.Saati T.L. Decision-making at dependences and feedback: Analytical networks. The lane with English / Nauch. edition A.V. Andreychikov, O.N. Andreychikova. Prod. the 4th. M.: LENAND, 2015. 360 p.Savich A.V., Tsipes G. L. How to estimate influence of the separate project on the end results of the program: opinions and facts. Management of projects and programs, 2007, no. 3(11), pp. 192–208.Savich A.V., Tsipes G. L. How to estimate influence of the separate project on the end results of the program: opinions and facts. Management of projects and programs, 2007, no. 3(11), pp. 192–208.Chuyeva L.N., Chuyev I.N. Analysis of financial and economic activity: Textbook. 7th prod., reslave. and additional. M.: Publishing and trade corporation "Dashkov and Ko", 2007. 352 p.Chuyeva L.N., Chuyev I.N. Analysis of financial and economic activity: Textbook. 7th prod., reslave. and additional. M.: Publishing and trade corporation "Dashkov and Ko", 2007. 352 p.Gerchak Y. On the Allocation of Uncertainty-Reduction Effort to Minimize Total Variability. IEEE Transactions, 2000, vol. 32, pp. 403–407.Gerchak Y. On the Allocation of Uncertainty-Reduction Effort to Minimize Total Variability. IEEE Transactions, 2000, vol. 32, pp. 403–407.Leu S.-S., Chen A.-T., Yang C.-H. A GABased Fuzzy Optimal Model for Construction TimeCost tradeoff. International Journal of Project Management, 2001, vol. 19, pp. 47–58.Leu S.-S., Chen A.-T., Yang C.-H. A GABased Fuzzy Optimal Model for Construction TimeCost tradeoff. International Journal of Project Management, 2001, vol. 19, pp. 47–58.www.standishgroup.com – the official site of the company, the providing service in research and the analysis of overall performance of IT projects.www.standishgroup.com – the official site of the company, the providing service in research and the analysis of overall performance of IT projects.www.infotech.com – the official site of the company, the providing service in research and the analysis of overall performance of IT projects.www.infotech.com – the official site of the company, the providing service in research and the analysis of overall performance of IT projects.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.