mirМИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие)MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)2079-46652411-796XSchool of Public Administrationmir-163Research ArticleИННОВАЦИИINNOVATIONДИНАМИКА ИННОВАЦИЙ В ЛАТИНСКОЙ АМЕРИКИFUTURE INNOVATION TRENDS IN LATIN AMERICAПоспеловаТ. В.PospelovaT. V.

Поспелова Татьяна Васильевна – аспирант

Pospelova Tatyana V. – Postgraduate

pospelova_t@mail.ruМосковский государственный университет им. М.В. ЛомоносоваРоссияLomonosov Moscow State UniversityRussian Federation20141209201552(18)4857Copyright © Поспелова Т.В., 20152015Поспелова Т.В.Pospelova T.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.mir-nayka.com/jour/article/view/163

Данная статья посвящена анализу инновационной активности ряда стран Латинской Америки. Проанализированы такие составляющие, как роль науки, бизнес-сообществ, а также государственная политика, направленная на переход к экономике, основанной на научных знаниях. На основании «the Gibbon’s Model» проведено сравнение инновационных моделей, которые реализуются в Бразилии, Чили и Мексике. Полученные данные можно использовать как практический инструментарий формирования инновационной политики в развивающихся странах. В заключение представлена оценка инновационной активности стран Латинской Америки.

This article off ers an analysis of innovation activities in three Latin American countries. Such components as the role of science, business communities, and public policies in the transition to a knowledge-based economy are analyzed. Based on the Gibbons Model, innovative models that are being implemented inBrazil,Chile, andMexicoare compared. The data obtained may be used as a practical tool in developing countries.

модель ГиббонсастартапинновацииЛатинская Америкакластеры«тройная спираль»the Gibbon’s Modelstart-upinnovationsLatin Americaclustersthe Triple Helix ModelReferencesДробот П.Н. Проблема количественного анализа в модели «Тройной спирали» / П.Н. Дробот, Д.А. Дробот, Н. Г. Тетеркина // Томский государственный университет. Материалы 1-й Международной практической конференции. Томск, 2009. – 134 с.Pospelova T.V. 2012. Master’s thesis «Perspectives of cooperation of science, business and the state in the formation of innovative economy in Russia»Etzkowitz, H. and M. Ranga (2011), “Spaces”: A Triple Helix Governance Strategy for Regional Innovation’, In: Rickne A., Laestadius and H. Etzkowitz (eds), Regional innovation systems: The Swedish experience of policy, governance and knowledge dynamics, Routledge.Shaimieva E.SH. Innovations for realization of technological modernization in the regions [Text]/ E. Sh. Shaimieva. - Kazan: the publishing house of the Institute of Economics, Management and Law “ Cognition,” 2011. – Р. 212По материалам лекций The Greatest Innovations of Silicon Valley (BUS 117) / Eugene Shteyn / Continuing Studies - Stanford University.Etzkowitz, H. and M. Ranga, 2011. “Spaces”: A Triple Helix Governance Strategy for Regional Innovation’, In: Rickne A., Laestadius and H. Etzkowitz (eds), Regional innovation systems: The Swedish experience of policy, governance and knowledge dynamics, Routledge.Поспелова Т.В. Перспективы взаимодействия науки, бизнеса и государства в условиях формирования инновационной экономики России: монография. М.: Издательский Дом «Наука», 2012. – 104 с. / ISBN 978-5-9902334-9-2Drobot, P.N., 2009. The problem of quantitative analysis in the Triple Helix model. Drobot P.N., Teterkina N.G. The Materials of the First International Practical Conference. Tomsk: Tomsk State University. – P. 134.Поспелова Т.В. Процесс формирования предпринимательских университетов в России / Т.В. Поспелова, Н.П. Иващенко // МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие). – 2013. – № 2 (14). – С. 66–70.Pospelova, T., 2012. Outlook for the interaction of science, business and state in building innovative economy in Russia. Мoscow: “Science” Publishing House. Pospelova T.V., and Ivashenko N.P. The process of formation of entrepreneurial universities in Russia.“Mir” (Modernization, Innovation, Development), vol. 2. – Р. 66–70.Baranenko S.P., Dudin M.N., Ljasnikov N.V., Busygin К.D. Using environmental approach to innovation-oriented development of industrial enterprises / / American Journal of Applied Sciences. – 2013. – Vol. 11, No.2. – P. 189–194.Chesbrough H.W. 2005, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating And Profiting from Technology Paperback. Harvard Business Review Press. – Р. 252.Dudin M.N., Lyasnikov N.V., Senin A.S. The Triple Helix Model as an Effective Instrument for the Innovation Development of Industrial Enterprises within the National Economy / / European Researcher. – 2014. – Vol.76, No. 6–1.Shteyn E. (2013) / The Greatest Innovations of Silicon Valley (BUS 117) / Continuing Studies – Stanford University.Etzkowitz, H., Goktepe-Hulten, D. (2010). Maybe they can? University technology transfer offices as regional growth engines. Int. J. Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 9(1/2): 166–181.The Lean Startup: The Lean Startup: Crown Publishing Group, 2011. 9. The World Bank, 2014. Data & Research: http:// data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV. GD.ZS 10. Christensen C.M. 2013. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Management of Innovation and Change). Harvard Business Review Press. – Р. 255.Etzkowitz, H., Klofsten, M. (2005). The Innovating Region: Towards a Theory of Knowledge Based Regional Development. Research Management, 35(3): 243–255.Etzkowitz, H., Klofsten, M. (2005). The Innovating Region: Towards a Theory of Knowledge Based Regional Development. Research Management, 35(3): 243–255.Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review 14, 14–19.Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review 14, 14–19.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.