mirМИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие)MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research)2079-46652411-796XSchool of Public Administration10.18184/2079-4665.2022.13.3.352-368mir-1312Research ArticleМОДЕРНИЗАЦИЯMODERNIZATIONРиски, вызовы и механизмы ESG-трансформации систем управленияRisks, threats and mechanisms of management systems ESG-transformationМарголинА. М.MargolinA. M.

Марголин Андрей Маркович, Директор Института финансов и устойчивого развития, проректор, доктор экономических наук, профессор

119571, г. Москва, проспект Вернадского, д. 82

Scopus author iD: 57205301323

Аndrey M. Margolin, Director of the Institute of Finance and Sustainable Development, Vice Rector, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

82, Vernadskogo av., Moscow, 119571

Scopus author iD: 57205301323

margolin-am@ranepa.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1925-2286ВякинаИ. В.VyakinaI. V.

Вякина Ирина Владимировна, заведующий кафедрой экономики и управления производством, доктор экономических наук, доцент

170026, г. Тверь, набережная Афанасия Никитина, д. 22

Irina V. Vyakina, Head of the Department of Economics and Production Management,, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

22, Afanasy Nikitin embankment, Tver, 170026

ivyakina@yahoo.comРоссийская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской ФедерацииРоссияRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)Russian FederationТверской государственный технический университетРоссияTver State Technical UniversityRussian Federation202205102022133352368Copyright © Марголин А.М., Вякина И.В., 20222022Марголин А.М., Вякина И.В.Margolin A.M., Vyakina I.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.mir-nayka.com/jour/article/view/1312

Цель статьи – выявление и идентификация факторов, препятствующих эффективному проведению ESGтрансформации систем управления, с учетом новых рисков и вызовов устойчивому развитию, и обоснование механизмов, обеспечивающих ее реализацию.Методы или методология проведения работы. Наряду с традиционными методами научного анализа, а также междисциплинарного подхода, характерного для исследования проблем устойчивого развития и диагностики ключевых факторов, связанных с ESG-трансформацией систем управления, в работе выполнен обзор научной литературы. В рамках исследования использовались различные рейтинговые модели, нормативные документы и руководящие принципы устойчивого развития, корпоративной социальной ответственности и диагностики ESG-факторов.Результаты работы. В работе проведена диагностика управляемых и неуправляемых рисков ESGтрансформации систем управления, определены тренды развития компетенций управленческих кадров, такую трансформацию осуществляющих, и раскрыты особенности достижения целей устойчивого развития. Суть авторской позиции заключается в том, что для достижения любой из целей устойчивого развития необходимо выполнение двух обязательных условий: обеспечение эффективного взаимодействия государства, бизнеса и гражданского общества и применение комплексного подхода к рассмотрению экономических, социальных и экологических аспектов, отражающих ее специфику.Выводы. Предложенный подход дает возможность разработки научно обоснованного инструментария минимизации рисков и механизмов достижения целей устойчивого развития на основе ESG-трансформации систем управления. Результаты, полученные в статье, могут быть использованы профессиональным сообществом, заинтересованном в продвижении ESG-повестки и достижении целей устойчивого развития на основе ESG-трансформации государственного и корпоративного управления.

Purpose: the article aims at justification and identification of the factors hindering the effective implementation of the management systems ESG-transformation, taking into account new risks and threats to sustainable development, and substantiation of the mechanisms that ensure its implementation.Methods: along with the traditional methods of scientific analysis, interdisciplinary approach typical for the study of sustainable development problems and the diagnosis of key factors associated with ESG-transformation of management systems, carried out a review of scientific literature, used various rating models, regulatory documents and guidelines for sustainable development, corporate social responsibility and diagnostics of ESG-factors.Results: the article performed diagnostics of managed and unmanaged risks of ESG-transformation of management systems, identified trends in the development of managerial personnel competencies that carry out such a transformation, and disclosed the features of achieving sustainable development goals. The essence of the author's position is that in order to achieve any of the sustainable development goals, two mandatory conditions must be met: ensuring effective interaction between the state, business and civil society and applying an integrated approach to considering economic, social and environmental aspects that reflect its specifics.Сonclusions and Relevance: the proposed approach makes it possible to develop scientifically based tools for minimizing risks and mechanisms for achieving sustainable development goals based on the ESG-transformation of management systems. Results obtained in the article may be useful for the professional community interested in promoting the ESG-agenda and achieving sustainable development goals based on the ESG-transformation of public and corporate governance.

ESG-рискиESG-трансформация систем управленияESG-факторыустойчивое развитиецели устойчивого развитияESG-risksESG-transformation of management systemsESG-factorssustainable developmentsustainable development goalsReferencesBowen H.R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Brothers: 1953. 276 p. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=4y0vAAAAMAAJ (дата обращения: 22.08.2022)Bowen H.R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Brothers: 1953. 276 p. URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=4y0vAAAAMAAJ (accessed 24 August 2022) (In Eng.)Boulding K.E. General Systems Theory-The Skeleton of Science // Management Science. 1956. Vol. 2. Iss. 3. P. 197–208. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2627132 (дата обращения: 24.08.2022)Boulding K.E. General Systems Theory-The Skeleton of Science. Management Science. 1956; 2(3):197–208. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2627132 (accessed 24 August 2022) (In Eng.)George G., Schillebeeckx S.J.D. Digital transformation, sustainability, and purpose in the multinational enterprise // Journal of World Business. 2022. Vol. 57. Iss. 3. P. 101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101326George G., Schillebeeckx S.J.D. Digital transformation, sustainability, and purpose in the multinational enterprise. Journal of World Business. 2022; 57(3):101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101326 (In Eng.)Верещагин В.В., Шемякина Т.Ю. Проблемы интеграции бизнес-процесса управления рисками устойчивости в корпоративное управление компании // Проблемы анализа риска. 2021. Т. 18. № 3. С. 66–76. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xjaqrx. https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2021-18-3-66-76Vereshchagin V.V., Shemyakina T.Yu. Challenges of integration risk management of sustainability of business processes to corporate governance of the company. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2021; 18(3):66–76. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xjaqrx. https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2021-18-3-66-76 (In Russ.)Емельянова Э.С., Васильев Л.А. Апробация подходов к оценке ESG-рисков российских компаний на региональном уровне // Федерализм. 2021. Т. 26. № 2(102). С. 25–42. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/yoqblp. https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2021-2-25-42Emelyanova E.S., Vasiliev L.A. Approbation of approaches to assessment of ESG risks of Russian companies at the regional level. Federalism. 2021; 26(2):25–42. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/yoqblp. https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2021-2-25-42 (In Russ.)Kundurpi A., Westman L., Luederitz C., Burch S., Mercado A. Navigating between adaptation and transformation: How intermediaries support businesses in sustainability transitions // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021. Vol. 283. P. 125366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125366Kundurpi A., Westman L., Luederitz C., Burch S., Mercado A. Navigating between adaptation and transformation: How intermediaries support businesses in sustainability transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 283:125366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125366 (In Eng.)Зенкина И.В. Влияние регуляторных рисков ESG-интеграции на устойчивое развитие энергетических компаний // Национальные интересы: приоритеты и безопасность. 2021. Т. 17. № 4(397). С. 624–648. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/kjvhmk. https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.17.4.624Zenkina I.V. The Impact of Regulatory Risks of ESG Integration on the Sustainable Development of Power Companies. National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2021; 17(4):624–648. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/kjvhmk. https://doi.org/10.24891/ni.17.4.624 (In Russ.)Смирнов В.Д. Управление ESG рисками в коммерческих организациях // Управленческие науки. 2020. Т. 10. № 3. С. 6–20. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/otgirk.https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2020-10-3-6-20Smirnov V.D. ESG risk management in commercial organizations. Management Sciences. 2020; 10(3):6–20. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/otgirk. https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2020-10-3-6-20 (In Russ.)George G. et al. Purpose in the for-profit firm: A review and framework for management research // Journal of management. 2021. P. 01492063211006450. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211006450George G. et al. Purpose in the for-profit firm: A review and framework for management research. Journal of management. 2021:01492063211006450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211006450 (In Eng.)Wang K.T., Kartika F., Wang W.W., Luo G. Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and the cost of equity: Evidence from East Asia // Emerging Markets Review. 2021. Vol. 47. P. 100801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100801Wang K.T., Kartika F., Wang W.W., Luo G. Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and the cost of equity: Evidence from East Asia. Emerging Markets Review. 2021; 47:100801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ememar.2021.100801 (In Eng.)Чипуренко Е.В., Лисицкая Т.В. Проблема оценки ESG-рисков полностью меняет формат корпоративной отчетности // Финансы. 2021. № 11. С. 51–56. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xikifhChipurenko E.V., Lisitskaya T.V. The problem of assessing ESG risks completely changes the format of corporate reporting. Finansy = Finance. 2021; (11):51–56. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/xikifh (In Russ.)Labidi C., Laribi D., Ureche-Rangau L. National culture and socially responsible fund flows // Emerging Markets Review. 2021. Vol. 46. P. 100751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100751Labidi C., Laribi D., Ureche-Rangau L. National culture and socially responsible fund flows. Emerging Markets Review. 2021; 46:100751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100751 (In Eng.)Lubinski C., Wadhwani R.D. Geopolitical jockeying: Economic nationalism and multinational strategy in historical perspective // Strategic Management Journal. 2020. Vol. 41. Iss. 3. P. 400–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3022Lubinski C., Wadhwani R.D. Geopolitical jockeying: Economic nationalism and multinational strategy in historical perspective. Strategic Management Journal. 2020; 41(3):400–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/ smj.3022 (In Eng.)Delios A., Perchthold G., Capri A. Cohesion, COVID-19 and contemporary challenges to globalization // Journal of World Business. 2021. Vol. 56. Iss. 3. P. 101197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101197Delios A., Perchthold G., Capri A. Cohesion, COVID-19 and contemporary challenges to globalization. Journal of World Business. 2021; 56(3):101197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101197 (In Eng.)Barrero J.M., Bloom N., Davis S.J. Why working from home will stick // National Bureau of Economic Research. 2021. Vol. 28731. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28731Barrero J.M., Bloom N., Davis S.J. Why working from home will stick. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2021; 28731. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28731 (In Eng.)Schillebeeckx S.J.D., Kautonen T., Hakala H. To buy green or not to buy green: Do structural dependencies block ecological responsiveness? // Journal of Management. 2022. Vol. 48. Iss. 2. P. 472–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320977896Schillebeeckx S.J.D., Kautonen T., Hakala H. To buy green or not to buy green: Do structural dependencies block ecological responsiveness? Journal of Management. 2022; 48(2):472–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320977896 (In Eng.)Челухина Н.Ф. Финансовые аспекты ESG рисков // Финансовая экономика. 2022. № 1. С. 150–153. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/zftfibChelukhina N.F. Financial aspects of ESG risks. Financial Economy. 2022; (1):150–153. EDN: https:// elibrary.ru/zftfib (In Russ.)Escoto X., Gebrehewot D., Morris K.C. Refocusing the barriers to sustainability for small and mediumsized manufacturers // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022. Vol. 338. P. 130589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130589Escoto X., Gebrehewot D., Morris K.C. Refocusing the barriers to sustainability for small and medium-sized manufacturers. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 338:130589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130589 (In Eng.)Martins A., Branco M.C., Melo P.N., Machado C. Sustainability in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda // Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 14. Iss. 11. P. 6493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116493Martins A., Branco M.C., Melo P.N., Machado C. Sustainability in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Sustainability. 2022; 14(11):6493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116493 (In Eng.)Sun P. et al. Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research // Journal of International Business Studies. 2021. Vol. 52. Iss. 9. P. 1818–1853. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00438-xSun P. et al. Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research. Journal of International Business Studies. 2021; 52(9):1818–1853. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00438-x (In Eng.)Kamalirezaei H., Rostamy A.A.A., Saeedi A., Zaghard M.K.V. Corporate social responsibility and bankruptcy probability: Exploring the role of market competition, intellectual capital, and equity cost // Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. 2020. Vol. 31. Iss. 1. P. 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22417Kamalirezaei H., Rostamy A.A.A., Saeedi A., Zaghard M.K.V. Corporate social responsibility and bankruptcy probability: Exploring the role of market competition, intellectual capital, and equity cost. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. 2020; 31(1):53–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22417 (In Eng.)Ye M., Wang H., Lu W. Opening the “black box” between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: From a critical review on moderators and mediators to an integrated framework // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021. Vol. 313. P. 127919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127919Ye M., Wang H., Lu W. Opening the “black box” between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: From a critical review on moderators and mediators to an integrated framework. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021; 313:127919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127919 (In Eng.)Fatemi A., Glaum M., Kaiser S. ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure // Global Finance Journal. 2018. Vol. 38. P. 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001Fatemi, A., Glaum, M. and Kaiser, S. ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal. 2018; 38:45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001 (In Eng.)Dragomir V.D. How do we measure corporate environmental performance? A critical review // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018. Vol. 196. P. 1124–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.014Dragomir V.D. How do we measure corporate environmental performance? A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018; 196:1124–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.014 (In Eng.)Rahdari A.H., Rostamy A.A.A. Designing a general set of sustainability indicators at the corporate level // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015. Vol. 108. Part A. P. 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.108Rahdari A.H., Rostamy A.A.A. Designing a general set of sustainability indicators at the corporate level. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015; 108(A):757–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.108 (In Eng.)Антонова М.В., Шумков Д.А. Критерии оценки ESG-рисков компании в контексте устойчивого развития // Вестник Белгородского университета кооперации, экономики и права. 2022. № 1(92). С. 125–132. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/drhsnw. https://doi.org/10.21295/2223-5639-2022-1-125-132Antonova M.V., Shumkov D.A. Criteria for assessing company ESG risks in the context of sustainable development. Vestnik Belgorodskogo universiteta kooperatsii, ekonomiki i prava = Herald of the Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law. 2022; (1):125–132. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/drhsnw. https://doi.org/10.21295/2223-5639-2022-1-125-132 (In Russ.)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.